West-Life: the last six months May-Oct 2018 APM, Madrid 4 May 2018

Urgent TODOs GDPR compliance M30 deliverables: D7.5 A HADDOCK server for EM D3.6 Update of requirements by other RI

Milestones M1.4 M4 Sustainability report approved by Executive Steering Committee Instruct 30 Report approved by Executive Steering Committee 1 M7.9 M32 Existing services updated to existing data types STFC Where an existing metadata standard is identified, and is not being used, the web service will be updated to handle the standard. This will be highlighted on the service portal. 7 M4.5 M15 Final deployment of the consolidated platform INFN 34 New interfaces/services integrated in the platform ready for production use by other WPs and published in the wiki 4

Deliverables 6.3 EMBL 32 Assembly queries D6.4 STFC 33 Provenance 5.9 Instruct 36 Update report on activities of the helpdesk 5.8 UU Report on the access and usage statistics 4.6 MU Final report on deployment of consolidated platform and the overall architecture 2.5 Engagement report 1.7 Final report 1.5 Sustainability report

Sustainability Instruct will host a migration hackathon in September EOSC pilot application(s)

Finishing up… Use of W-L SSO Integrate SSO with Use of VF CCD Integrate SSO with EGI CheckIn, Indigo Use of VF CCD, AMPS-NMR Link VF to pdb-dev? ARP/wARP for NMR

…Finishing up… SSBio Jupyter? AUP deployment Cookie compliance New services, add to portal and bio.tools: SpotON, DipCheck VM update Log referer to trace use of W-L interactome GDPR compliant if user not identifiable

…Finishing up NLP: GROMACScloud Deploy Repository Summary Paper? Deployment to EuropePMC 3dBionotes PDB-REDO GROMACScloud Deploy Repository Summary Paper? Acta Cryst D? joint submission with WP7 papers?

Final Report and Final Review Part A: structured tables from SyGMa Inc. Risks Part B: Objectives Explanation of Work for each WP Based on presentations at this meeting Impact Dissemination Followup of reviewers’ recommendations Time to start writing now http://internal-wiki.west-life.eu/index.php/Final_Report

Proposed Mitigation actions Risks Description WP Likeli- hood Impact Risk score Proposed Mitigation actions PM18 evaluation PM24 evaluation R7 Sustainability WP2 4 16 Aim to deliver useful tools to industry to generate income; take architectural choices with sustainability in mind See response to reviewers Discussion ongoing R6 Poor take up 3 5 15 Some development partners are part of the user community; dissemination workshops User presentations at APM R8 Brexit Main partner STFC is unlikely to be in ERA for any follow-on project. UK government guarantee of H202 funds mitigates No impact on project R1 No sustainability plan in place by end of project WP1 12 New milestone introduced Plan under discussion R4 Staff retention Internal communication; the project goals areambitious so support personal development Staff replaced at Luna and Instruct Deliverables not impacted R16 Resistance to data sharing WP6 Make it easy to do the right thing; collaborate with Instruct on policy. Risk not realised; D6.2 will address this Risk not realised R13 Integration of tools may fail WP5 2 10 Use metrics to monitor, and reprioritise as necessary R2 Significant underspending 9 Transfer of money between partners All partners on track to supply resource as planned Proposed extension to bridge to EINFRA-EOSC-04

Using unclaimed 14PM Transfer between partners? More dissemination? STFC happy to transfer More dissemination?

Supplementary material

FP7 policy on extensions   " the Commission services will, in future, more closely examine each request for an extension to the duration of the project to ensure that they are only given where there is a clear added value for the project, or where external events (not reasonably foreseeable at the point of signing the grant) mean that it is impossible to complete the work in the agreed timeframe. … (g) In principle, a grant extension of more than six months could be considered as disproportionate if not due to exceptional reasons. Extensions of longer than six months, or a second extension, must be absolutely exceptional. (h) Requests for extension of the grant to undertake additional work should not be accepted, even if it is claimed to be without additional cost.“ http://grantsaccess.ethz.ch/fileadmin/content/downloads/Final_note_RJS_coordinators_-_final.pdf

Budgetary details Grant amount in Euros RP1 Total Spend as of 31st Mar 2018 Addn reporting Notes on addn reporting STFC 795750 229437.94 456219.79 NKI AVL 194625 74644.06 111012.07 36368.01 Nov 17 to April 18 EMBL 641750 194122.44 238248.4275 44125.99 Q10 only MU 393250 165240.84 296459.44 131218.6 RP2 to end of March CSIS 402500 81399.39 233177.665 151778.275 RP2 CIRPMMP 406250 141191.05 no report INSTRUCT 152750 35005.24 UU 392250 158316.43 212409.44 54093 LUNA 258000 126243.75 147742.75 21,499 INFN 344000 147849.45 177035.675 29186.225 Q9, but can't find Q10