Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
Advertisements

WG 2A ECOSTAT 4-5 MARCH 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Progress Report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso Joint Research Centre.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 Comparability of the results of the intercalibration exercise – MS sharing the same method Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint.
GIG plan updates GIG leads were requested to update their work plans
Biological quality elements, intercalibration and ecological status
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Intercalibration results 2006/2007
Intercalibration Results 2006
IC network selection process
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register: RIVERS.
Results of the metadata analysis Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) March 4-5 , 2004, Ispra, Italy Peeter Nõges Anna-Stiina.
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
WG 2A Ecological Status Drafting group: Guidance on the process of the intercalibration excercise 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03.
Nitrates Directive: outline and reporting activities October 2016
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Draft Commission Decision on Intercalibration
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, 3-4 July 2006
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
WG 2.5 Intercalibration.
Intercalibration Timetable
Discussion agenda Summary & proposals (30 min)
EU Water Framework Directive
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Nitrates Directive: outline and reporting activities March 2018
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
WFD – CIS Working group A ECOSTAT
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
Water Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River groups with extension
Metadata analysis.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
Lake Intercalibration – IC Decision Annexes + what to do in future
Nitrates Directive: outline and reporting activities October 2016
Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
Working Group D Reporting, Brussels 31 March – 1 April 2008
EU Water Framework Directive
Reporting template for milestone reports
Common Implementation Strategy for the
EU Water Framework Directive
WFD CIS WG ECOSTAT meeting on 8-9 October 2007 Objectives What do we need to achieve during this meeting?
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Intercalibration round 2: finalisation and open technical issues – RIVERS ECOSTAT October 2012.
EU Water Framework Directive
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
WG A Ecological Status Intercalibration: Where do we go from here ?
ECOSTAT nutrient work : Brief update February 2017
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Presentation transcript:

Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report Ecostat, Brussels, 12-13 October 2006

Draft Commission Decision version 1 – 20 September 2006

DRAFT by DG ENV Commission Decision establishing the values for the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise in accordance with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Preable – legal basis Decision: H-G, G-M boundaries for national monitoring and classification systems are established in the annex. In setting the boundaries for national classification schemes MS shall take into account the results of the intercalibration exercise.

Annex: Results of the intercalibration exercise Water category Geographical Intercalibration Group Description of types that have been intercalibrated Countries participating in the intercalibration INTERCALIBRATION RESULTS Biological Quality Element National methods intercalibrated Results

Example of Draft Annex contents INTERCALIBRATION RESULTS (Central Lakes) Biological Quality Element Phytoplankton (Chlorophyll) Results (in mg/L Chlorophyll a, growing season mean values) Type L-CB1 Type L-CB2 Type L-CB3 Mean value Range of values Reference value 3.2 2.6 - 3.8 6.8 6.2 - 7.4 3.1 2.5 – 3.7 High-Good boundary 5.8 4.6 - 7.0 10.8 9.9 - 11.7 5.4 4.3 – 6.5 Good-Moderate boundary 10.0 8.0 – 12.0 23.0 21.0 – 25.0

Current draft Annex contains results of Rivers: Alpine GIG macroinvertebrates Lakes: all GIGs phytoplankton (chlorophyll-a) Coastal: not included yet Contents to be discussed in River/Lakes/Coastal sessions

Draft Outline Technical Report 22 September 2006

Technical Report outline General introduction GIGs and types General discussion Part 1 – Rivers Section 1 – General Part Section 2 – Macroinvertebrates 1. Introduction 2. Methodology and Results 2.1 Northern GIG 2.2 Central-Baltic GIG …… 3. Discussion Section 3 – Macrophytes ….. Part 2 – Lakes Part 3 – Coastal-Transitional Contents of approved final Milestone report

Current draft Technical Report contains: Rivers: Alpine GIG macroinvertebrates Lakes: all GIGs phytoplankton (chlorophyll-a) Contents to be discussed in River/Lakes/Coastal sessions It is proposed that all results will be reported in this format