Proof by induction There are different ways to prove in Maths, induction uses a ‘domino effect’: Step 1: test that an algebraic statement is true for one.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Know what is meant by proof by Induction Learning Outcomes: PROOF BY INDUCTION Be able to use proof by induction to prove statements.
Advertisements

To prove by induction that 2 n ≥ n 2 for n ≥ 4, n  N Next (c) Project Maths Development Team 2011.
1.1The Principle of Mathematical Induction 1.2Divisibility Chapter Summary Case Study Mathematical Induction 1.
1 Mathematical Induction. 2 Mathematical Induction: Example  Show that any postage of ≥ 8¢ can be obtained using 3¢ and 5¢ stamps.  First check for.
Induction and recursion
FP1 Chapter 6 – Proof By Induction
CS5371 Theory of Computation
Recursive Definitions Rosen, 3.4. Recursive (or inductive) Definitions Sometimes easier to define an object in terms of itself. This process is called.
Proof by Induction and contradiction Leo Cheung. The TAs Our office is in SHB117, feel free to come if you get problems about the course Or ask your questions.
INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES
Chapter 10 Sequences, Induction, and Probability Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Mathematical Induction.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 8-1.
Induction and recursion
Sequences and Series By: Olivia, Jon, Jordan, and Jaymie.
Induction and recursion
Methods of Proofs PREDICATE LOGIC The “Quantifiers” and are known as predicate quantifiers. " means for all and means there exists. Example 1: If we.
9.4 Mathematical Induction
Mathematical Induction Digital Lesson. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 Mathematical induction is a legitimate method.
Section 3.3: Mathematical Induction Mathematical induction is a proof technique that can be used to prove theorems of the form:  n  Z +,P(n) We have.
CompSci 102 Discrete Math for Computer Science March 1, 2012 Prof. Rodger Slides modified from Rosen.
Chapter 1: Introduction
To prove by induction that 3 is a factor of 4 n - 1, n  N Next (c) Project Maths Development Team 2011.
Method of proofs.  Consider the statements: “Humans have two eyes”  It implies the “universal quantification”  If a is a Human then a has two eyes.
Inductive Proofs and Inductive Definitions Jim Skon.
Mathematical Induction Section 5.1. Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1.We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2.If.
Mathematical Induction
1 CMSC 341 Math Review. 2 Exponents Identities (X A ) B = X AB X A * X B = X A+B X A / X B = X A-B X A + X B  X A+B.
Proof by Induction 1.Explanation 1Explanation 1 2.Explanation 2Explanation 2 3.Example DivisionExample Division 4.Example SequencesExample Sequences 5.Example.
Chapter 5. Section 5.1 Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1.We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2.If we can reach.
5-5 Indirect Proof. Indirect Reasoning: all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.
Mathematical Induction Thinking Skill: Develop Confidence in Reason Warm Up: Find the k+1 term (P k+1 ) 1) 2)
Section 8.4 Mathematical Induction. Mathematical Induction In this section we are going to perform a type of mathematical proof called mathematical induction.
Section 5.1. Climbing an Infinite Ladder Suppose we have an infinite ladder: 1.We can reach the first rung of the ladder. 2.If we can reach a particular.
3.3 Mathematical Induction 1 Follow me for a walk through...
Chapter 5 1. Chapter Summary  Mathematical Induction  Strong Induction  Recursive Definitions  Structural Induction  Recursive Algorithms.
Mathematical Induction. The Principle of Mathematical Induction Let S n be a statement involving the positive integer n. If 1.S 1 is true, and 2.the truth.
INDUCTION David Kauchak CS52 – Spring to-1 multiplexer control control_negate and_out1 input0 input1 and_out2 output.
Proof Techniques CS160/CS122 Rosen: 1.5, 1.6, 1.7.
Induction (chapter of the book and chapter of the notes)
11.7 – Proof by Mathematical Induction
MATH 224 – Discrete Mathematics
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
COMP108 Algorithmic Foundations Mathematical Induction
Sequences.
Chapter 3 The Real Numbers.
Induction and recursion
Mathematical Induction Recursion
Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Look at specific examples. • Recognize patterns, which.
CSE373: Data Structures and Algorithms Lecture 2: Proof by Induction
Mathematical Induction
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
BaSIC Math Reviews.
Notes 9.5 – Mathematical Induction
Induction and recursion
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
CMSC 341 Math Review.
Mathematical Induction
12.1 Define & Use Sequences & Series
Induction (Section 3.3).
Proof by Induction.
Induction Chapter
Proof by Induction.
Chapter 11: Further Topics in Algebra
Proof by Induction L.O. All pupils understand proof by induction
(c) Project Maths Development Team 2011
Mathematical Induction
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Recall that if the antecedent (LHS) of a conditional statement is true, then it will be true if and only if its consequent (RHS) is also true. Therefore,
11.4 Mathematical Induction
COMP108 Algorithmic Foundations Mathematical Induction
Presentation transcript:

Proof by induction There are different ways to prove in Maths, induction uses a ‘domino effect’: Step 1: test that an algebraic statement is true for one case, when n = 1 Step 2: assume it is true for a general case, when n = k Step 3: show that the statement holds for the next case, n = k + 1 Step 4: conclude that as the first case is true, and that subsequent cases are true, the statement must be true for all cases This technique is applied to 4 different types of statement in FP1: Proving the summation of a series Proving divisibility Eg prove that is divisible by 4 Eg prove that Proving a general term for a recurrence relation Proving a matrix power Eg Given that Eg prove that prove that

WB35(a) Prove by induction that, for any positive integer n, LHS = RHS, true for n = 1 Assume that using assumption as required true for n = k + 1 if true for n = k. True for n = 1, true for all n.

WB36(a) Prove by induction that, LHS = RHS, true for n = 1 Assume that using assumption Now try Ex 6A as required true for n = k + 1 if true for n = k. True for n = 1, true for all n.

Ex 6A Q7 Q6 Q9

Recurrence relationship WB31 A sequence of numbers is defined by Prove by induction that, for n  ℤ, nth term rule nth term rule as given nth term rule true for n = 1 Recurrence relationship Assume that by recurrence relationship using assumption expanding as required true for n = k + 1 if true for n = k. True for n = 1, true for all n.

Recurrence relationship WB32 A sequence of numbers u1, u2, u3, u4, . . ., is defined by Prove by induction that, for n  ℤ+, nth term rule Recurrence relationship nth term rule true for n = 1 Assume that by recurrence relationship using assumption Now try Ex 6C as required true for n = k + 1 if true for n = k. True for n = 1, true for all n.

WB33 Prove by induction, that for n  ℤ+, true for n = 1 Assume that true for n = k + 1 if true for n = k. True for n = 1, true for all n. Now try Ex 6D

Ex 6D Q2 Q4 Q3

(b) is divisible by 12 true for n = 1 Assume that for some A  ℤ To prove divisibility, use the fact that: so true for n = k + 1 if true for n = k. True for n = 1, true for all n.

WB34 (a) Show that b) Hence, or otherwise, prove by induction that, for n  ℤ+, f(n) is divisible by 8. true for n = 1 Assume that for some A  ℤ Now try Ex 6B using (a) true for n = k + 1 if true for n = k. True for n = 1, true for all n.

The divisibility method must be adapted at times to achieve the required proof: By using prove by induction that, for n  ℤ+, f(n) is divisible by 9. Eg Assume that for some A  ℤ Why consider instead of the usual ? This is not obviously divisible by 9 - the standard method fails

If the method is adapted, the proof may require some extra explanation Eg By using prove by induction that, for n  ℤ+, f(n) is divisible by 5. Assume that for some A  ℤ using earlier result This tells us that But as 2 and 5 are coprime, f(k+1) must be divisible by 5 for some B  ℤ This statement validates the proof and must be included Coprime numbers share no factors

The general term given a recurrence relation Proving: Example Method Matrix powers Summation of a series The general term given a recurrence relation If given given then that Divisibility is divisible by 4