SHQ Review Process Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-code User Pays. 2 What we will cover Background Current Services Governance Arrangements What is working well What is not working as well.
Advertisements

12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
UNC Urgent Modification Proposal 0275 Supplemental Analysis and Timeline.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
Shipperless & Unregistered site working group Recommendations to Process Backlog Shipper Activity Monthly report No interest - orphaned Widened identity.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Joel Martin 23 rd November 2010 MOD 329 – UNC Rules on setting SHQs / SOQs & the Network Referral Process.
IGT Single Service Provision Requirements Update – 27 th March 2013.
UNC Proposal 329 – Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements - DM SHQs and DM SOQs Joel Martin – 21/09/10.
Generic & Enduring Functionality to Allow Xoserve to Confirm a Supply Point into a Shipper’s Portfolio UK Link Committee – April 2013.
11 User Pays User Committee 12th November Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
DN Interruption Reform Distribution Workstream 23 rd July 2009.
Presented by : Steven J Edwards, Head of Income and Pricing, Wales & West Utilities GDN Allowed and collected revenue awareness presentation for Shippers.
Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Mod Clarifications Transmission Workstream 6 August 2009.
11 User Pays User Committee 11th January Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Mod_02_13 Registration of Charges Legal Spending Update.
11 User Pays User Committee 16th February Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –25 th February 2010 Distribution Workstream.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
Trades and Transfers Workshop, 6 th November 2007.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Review of Offtake Arrangements Document Section I - NTS Operational Flows 10 th June 2010 – Offtake Arrangements Workstream.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –26 th November 2009 Distribution Workstream.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
SoS Report PAC – 13th December 2016.
User Pays User Committee 12th November 2013
Modification Proposal 0283 Update
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
ESB Networks AIP Programme
Performance Indicators
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
UK Link Technology Refresh
Mod 0621 Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.
Must Read Process Guide For Shippers
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Project Nexus Workgroup MPRN Lifecycle 11th August 2014
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
Simon Trivella – 22nd May 2008 Distribution Workstream
MOD_21_18 Application of Settlement Reallocation Agreements to Market Operator Charges and Settlement Document Definition and Usage 21st June 2018.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Mod 0621 Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
CSS Consequential Change CoS Shell Record Submission for Discussion at 630R 27th April 2018.
Transporter Initiated SPA Confirmations on behalf of User Potential Impact Discussion with UK Link Committee.
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
DN Interruption Phase II
UNC Modification 0634 (Urgent) – Post Implementation Assessment
Proposed Changes to UNC Section Q Emergencies - Mod 035
Nexus Workgroup Read Validation Scenarios
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
UNC Modification 0229 Role of the UNC Committee
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update
Mod565 TSL8 - Nominations Referred Calculations
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update for April & May 2019
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update for June 2019
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC - July 2019
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC - July 2019
Presentation transcript:

SHQ Review Process Update Erika Melén – Network Code Manager 10th December 2013

MOD390 – SHQ Review Current Process UNC Modification 390 was implemented in 2012 This introduced to code a process whereby DNOs provide reports to shippers by the end of April each year of sites where the SHQ/SPOR (maximum instantaneous rate in kWh/hour) appears significantly under- or overstated compared against actual usage. An obligation was placed on shippers to review the amended SHQ/SPOR amounts with customers and respond to the DNOs within 3 months to say whether or not they agreed to the amended values During the 2013 review 12 Shippers contacted for revisions to 146 sites - Out of the 12 Shippers only 7 responded – much improved from 2012 but still shows non-compliance from 5 shippers

Current SHQ Review Process SPOR report sent from GDN by end of April Shipper speaks to customer to establish if suggested values are suitable Shipper responds to GDN by end of July with either agreement to values or not (current breaches to this stage) If agreement then Shipper re-nominates site by end of August / Oct-Jan if SOQ reduction required (current breaches to this stage)

Option 1 SPOR report sent from GDN by end of April Shipper speaks to customer to establish if suggested values are suitable Shipper responds to GDN by end of July with either agreement to values or not If agreement then Shipper re-nominates site by end of August / Oct-Jan if SOQ reduction required GDN re-nomination of site on behalf of shipper in cases of no response / no re-nomination – notification and charge to shipper for work required If no response from shipper If no re-nomination by shipper

Option 2 SPOR report sent from GDN by end of April Shipper responds to GDN by end of July with either agreement to values or not If agreement then Shipper re-nominates site by end of August / Oct-Jan if SOQ reduction required Shipper speaks to customer to establish if suggested values are suitable If no re-nomination by shipper GDN re-nomination of site on behalf of shipper in cases of no response / no re-nomination – notification and charge to shipper for work required If no response from shipper - GDN contacts customer directly re SHQ change Customer agrees to suggested SHQ? YES – GDN informs shipper. 2 week objection period then re-nom NO – No further action

Option 3 SPOR report sent from GDN by end of April If agreement then Shipper re-nominates site by end of August / Oct-Jan if SOQ reduction required Shipper responds to GDN by end of July with either agreement to values or not Shipper speaks to customer to establish if suggested values are suitable 1st April Y+1 SPOR report run to show usage since end August Y-1 Where during Y-1 SPOR review a new higher SHQ value was suggested but the shipper either didn’t respond or re-nominate and the customer has used over the value. A penalty charge will be issued to the Shipper (similar to a SHQ Ratchet)

Thank you! Any preferred option for a modification?