Methodology 327 interviews with Cotati voters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Findings from Recent Illinois Voter Survey Survey Conducted: May 12-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy.
Advertisements

Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014.
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.
December 2014 © 2014 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without.
EMC Research, Inc th Street, Suite 820 Oakland, CA (510) EMC # Telephone Survey of Cambrian Elementary School District Voters.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Summer 2015 Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc.
BLAINE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
Prepared for: Vancouver Police Department Resident and Business Survey Prepared by: NRG Research Group April 4, 2007.
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
Survey conducted: May 14-19, Key Findings Two-thirds of respondents perceive that the City is headed in the right direction. Six out.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Survey Conducted: April 6-10, & May 4, 2014 City of Sausalito Community Survey Summary of Results May 27, 2014.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey September 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office Nov 6, 2003.
City of Indio Community Survey SUMMARY PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL June 16, 2010 Presented by: Rick Sklarz, Senior Researcher.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey February 2006 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office February 10, 2006.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
FALL 2014 City of Artesia: Fiscal Challenges and Measure Y Information.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
ADDRESSES BASIC NEEDS Affordable housing is available to community residents Figs Percentage of people age 60+ who want to remain in their current.
Methodology Sample of 402 Interviews conducted between August 19-30, 2015 Screening qualifications included West Virginia residency, current voter registration,
The 2015 Grove City Community Attitudes Survey Saperstein Associates, Inc. | Summer 2015.
Survey Conducted May 11-22, Methodology Telephone survey (landline and cell phones) of a random sample of 295 voters registered to vote.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
Summary of West Virginia Statewide Polling
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Methodology – Phone Survey
Chatham County 2015 Biennial Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Methodology Survey of 402 randomly-selected Larkspur residents
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
2017 Community Survey Town of Snowmass Village, CO
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Plymouth Community Parks and Recreation
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Shifting Sands on the Same Beach
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
Survey Methodology 1,042 online interviews with California adults
Post-Secondary Education in Ontario: Managing Challenges in an Age of Austerity 905 Region - January 2013.
CTU online quantitative survey April 2018
Methodology Surveys were distributed to 1 out of 4 residential addresses 288 Surveys were returned and analyzed (Community Attitude = 143, Need Assessment=
June 2018 Results 79.0% Yes 50.9% Yes 66.2% Yes 76.7% Yes 67.5% Yes.
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
June 2018 Results 66.2% Yes 50.9% Yes 76.7% Yes 67.5% Yes.
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Community Conversation on Essential City Service Needs
Survey Methodology 1,042 online interviews with California adults
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Police Services Analysis – Community Meeting 2
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Methodology 1172 online and telephone interviews with voters likely to cast ballots in November 2018 in Petaluma This sample included a sub-sample of 949.
Los Angeles County Public Opinion Landscape
Presentation transcript:

Methodology 327 interviews with Cotati voters Conducted January 7-21, 2019, online and via landline and cell phones Margin of sampling error of ±5.7% at the 95% confidence interval Due to rounding, some percentages do not add up to 100% Selected comparisons to prior research in the city 1

87% 67% 67% Key Numbers Rated life in Cotati “excellent” or “good” Approved of the performance of Cotati City government overall 67% Considered the cost of housing an “extremely” or “very serious problem” in Cotati

General Impressions of Life in Cotati

By an 11-to-1 margin, respondents said they felt the City was headed in the right direction. Would you say that things in the City of Cotati are generally headed in the right direction or are they off on the wrong track?

More than four in five rated the City as an “excellent” or “good” place to live. Generally speaking, how would you rate the City of Cotati as a place to live: is it an excellent place to live, a good place to live, just average, poor, or an extremely poor place to live? Excellent/ Good 87% Poor/ Extremely Poor 2%

At the same time, two-thirds stated that the cost of housing was a serious problem. Ext./ Very Ser. 67% 55% 36% 26% 24% 22% I'd like to read you some problems facing the City of Cotati that other people have mentioned. Please tell me whether you think it is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, a somewhat serious problem, or not too serious a problem in Cotati. Split Sample

In what was part of a theme, very few respondents saw crime as a problem. Ext./ Very Ser. 22% 16% 15% 5% I'd like to read you some problems facing the City of Cotati that other people have mentioned. Please tell me whether you think it is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, a somewhat serious problem, or not too serious a problem in Cotati. Split Sample

Concerns about crime, park maintenance, city government waste, and the local economy have consistently declined. (Extremely/Very Serious Problem) Problem 2009 2013 2019 Traffic congestion on local streets and roads 25% 20% 26% The amount people pay in local sales taxes 18% 22% The amount people pay in local taxes 16% 15% Crime in general 14% 10% 5% Potholes and maintenance of local streets and roads NA 36% Park maintenance Waste and inefficiency in city government 43% 28% The condition of the local economy 45% 35% The number of police on duty 31% I’d like to read you some problems facing the City of Cotati that other people have mentioned. Please tell me whether you think it is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, a somewhat serious problem, or not too serious a problem in Cotati. Split Sample

Views of Local Government

More than four in five respondents approved of the police department, while seven in ten approved of public works and recreation. I am going to read you the names of a few departments in the City of Cotati. Please tell me if you approve or disapprove of the job being done by that department. Total App. Total Disapp. 82% 9% 72% 8% 71% 6% 67% 61% 10% 49% 20%

Respondents largely agreed the city is a good place to raise a family, and compares well to neighboring cities’ quality of life. Total Acc. Total Inacc. 92% 5% 76% 13% 56% 11% Cotati is a good place to raise a family. Cotati provides a better quality of life than other neighboring cities. Cotati City government operates in a way that is open and accountable to the public. I am going to read you some statements about the City of Cotati. Please tell me if you think each of the following statements is accurate or inaccurate.

Importance of and Satisfaction with City Services and Programs

Assessing City Services and Programs Respondents were asked to rate the importance of 27 services and programs that the City provides: is it extremely, very, somewhat or not too important to making Cotati a good place to live? Then they were asked whether they were satisfied or dissatisfied with the same list of services and programs. On each dimension, we looked at change over time. We also looked at the interaction of importance and satisfaction levels to show areas of strength and areas for improvement.

The highest priorities included water infrastructure, maintaining financial viability and public safety, particularly domestic violence and 911 response. Ext./Very Impt. 94% 93% 92% 88% 86% 84% Let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Cotati residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Cotati a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. Split Sample

Other important priorities included parks, road repairs, and youth programs. Ext./Very Impt. 81% 80% 79% 78% 75% Let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Cotati residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Cotati a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. ^Not Part of Split Sample

Landscaping and special events were less-urgent priorities by comparison. Ext./Very Impt. 74% 73% 69% 68% 63% 61% 58% 55% Maintaining climate protection and energy efficiency programs that reduce global warming pollution Q9. Let me ask you about some specific City services provided to Cotati residents. Please tell me how important each service is to making Cotati a good place to live: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. Split Sample

Respondents were especially satisfied with park and landscaping maintenance, as well as waste disposal services. Total Sat. Total Dissat. 81% 7% 78% 8% 75% 72% 9% 68% 67% 21% I am going to read you a very similar list of services provided to residents. Please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Split Sample

About three in ten were dissatisfied with road repairs and attracting new businesses. Total Sat. Total Dissat. 67% 13% 22% 65% 64% 29% 62% 6% 58% 4% 51% 50% 12% 47% 28% I am going to read you a very similar list of services provided to residents. Please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. ^Not Part of Split Sample

The lower-rated programs and services were largely because respondents have not experienced them personally. Total Sat. Total Dissat. 46% 9% 8% 39% 5% 37% 11% 36% 3% 33% 26% 10% 18% 15% Maintaining climate protection and energy efficiency programs that reduce global warming pollution I am going to read you a very similar list of services provided to residents. Please tell me how satisfied you are with that service: very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. Split Sample

It can be informative for planning and budgeting purposes to combine the importance and satisfaction ratings to see if there are any relative mismatches between importance and satisfaction

All services are generally important, but given unfamiliarity with many, some satisfaction levels appear quite low.

Let’s zoom in to look at these more closely… Removing the “don’t knows” from the satisfaction ratings to create “informed” satisfaction ratings creates a cluster of services in the upper right… Let’s zoom in to look at these more closely…

Now we can start looking at different groupings of services…

First, there are a lot of services seen as extremely/very important by 70% or more and with satisfaction levels also at least 70%. Maintaining police patrols Retaining local businesses Preparing for natural disasters Maintaining water conservation Enhancing Cotati’s fiscal stability Maintaining water & sewer systems Providing youth recreation programs Maintaining crime prevention services Maintaining a local 911 emergency dispatch Providing garbage services & waste disposal Maintaining the financial viability of the City Preventing and investigating property crimes Maintaining programs to reduce drunk driving Maintaining domestic violence response services Repairing and maintaining sidewalks & bike paths Maintaining Cotati’s City-run, local police department

Next, while attracting new local business is a comparatively lower priority, satisfaction levels seem to match.

These services were seen as extremely/very important by less that 70%, but had comparatively higher levels of satisfaction.

These services had satisfaction levels notably lower than how important they are viewed.

Views of Safety

Nearly all respondents feel safe in Cotati, and three in five said they feel “very safe.” When you are in Cotati, do you feel very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe, or very unsafe? Total Safe 96% Total Unsafe 4%

A specific police officer is assigned to patrol my neighborhood. Just one in five respondents were aware of the police beats program recently introduced. A specific police officer is assigned to patrol my neighborhood. Total Accurate 19% Total Inaccurate 19% I am going to read you some statements about the City of Cotati. Please tell me if you think each of the following statements is accurate or inaccurate.

City Services and Communications

Respondents relied most frequently on local news and information in their utility bill. I’m going to read you a list of sources from which people get information about Cotati’s City government.  I’d like you to tell me how often you use it to get information about Cotati City government: frequently, occasionally, rarely, or never. Freq./ Occas. 60% 53% 47% 46% 43% 42% 34% 18% 14% The Press Democrat The City's newsletter in your utility bill The Community Voice The City of Cotati Activity Guide Posts from the City on social networking sites, including Facebook, Nixle, and Nextdoor Posts from friends on social networking sites, including Facebook, Twitter, and Nextdoor Cotati's City website The Sonoma County Gazette Cotati City Council meetings

Half of Cotati respondents recall contact with a City employee in the last two years. Over the last two years, have you had contact with a City department or agency? Some groups were a bit more likely to report contact with the City: Democrats ages 50+ Republicans ages 50+ Ages 40-64 Mothers of children under 18 Republican men Men over age 50 21+ year residents of Cotati

With which City department did you have contact? For most, that contact was with an employee in public safety or utilities. With which City department did you have contact? Among Those With Contact Only, N=167

They were overwhelmingly satisfied with the level of service they received overall. And would you say that you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied or not at all satisfied with the overall level of customer service you received? Among Those With Contact Only, N=167 Total Satisfied 90% Total Not Satisfied 10%

Conclusions

Conclusions Respondents were largely quite satisfied with life in the City – this is in contrast to many other Bay Area communities where people have become more pessimistic. They overwhelmingly saw it as a good place to raise a family. Housing was a top concern, followed by traffic, with few other problems rating as particularly urgent. They feel quite safe. They broadly approved of the City’s Police Department, Public Works and Recreation. Approval ratings for City Council were positive. Those who have had contact with a City employee were satisfied with the interaction.