S3 Targeted Support – LAGREG Horizontal Activities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring innovation South Asian Regional Workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation Statistics Kathmandu, Nepal 6-9 December 2010.
Advertisements

The political framework
Smart Growth for Europes Cities and Regions: Insights from Economic Geography for An Integrated Approach Philip McCann University of Groningen Special.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
URBACT II Building Healthy Communities 1 st Steering Group Meeting Brussels, 9-10 June 2008 An overview.
Parallel Workshop Session 2: Workshop 5 Research, Innovation and Competitiveness Advanced Monitoring and Coordination of EU R&D Policies at Regional Level.
Malta Council for Science and Technology Introduction to the National R&I Ecosystem 20 th November 2009 Dr Ing. Nicholas J. Sammut Chairperson, MCST.
Building open regional innovation strategies: New opportunities provided by Smart Specialisation Strategies Claire Nauwelaers Independent STI policy expert.
Coast2capital.org.uk European Structural and Investment Funds Coast to Capital Shadow ESIF Committee 1 st Meeting, December 5 th 2014.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Cohesion and Regional Innovation CG: “Horizons 2015: First Experiences, Emerging Expectations” V.Kalm, San Servolo
Successor to the Strategy for Science, Technology and Innovation HRB and Department of Health Consultation Workshop 11 March 2015 Dermot Curran Assistant.
22 Feb 2007EU-Russia Co-operation1 Dr. Stephan Pascall Advisor to the Director Directorate G: Components and Systems DG Information Society and Media European.
National innovation strategies and policies - Republic of Slovenia Dr. Klemen Grošelj SIPO Novi Sad,
Measuring Innovation and Smart Specialisation – What have we Learned? Dirk Pilat, OECD.
Lisbon strategy, competitiveness and ERA Maja Bucar Centre of International Relations Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.
Antonio García Gómez European Commission, DG REGIO R&I Programme Manager - EU policies – Spain Unit Senior expert for matrix interaction with Competence.
2.3. RIS3 governance. Starting a RIS3 it is necessary to define the decision making and management structures. Demand-side perspectives, from innovation-user.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
Regional Innovation Indicators METROPOLIS Thematic Group Helsinki April 2003 The Madrid Experience.
Conference on regional governance in a global context The experience of Emilia Romagna Morena Diazzi Managing Authority ERDF ROP
S&T cooperation Mediterranean and EU countries Spanish proposal Casablanca, 17th November 2009 Dr Angeles Rodríguez-Peña Deputy European Programmes Ministry.
ENoLL Summer SchoolAmsterdam, 3 September, Funding Human Smart Cities and the Smart Specialisation Role Jesse Marsh Atelier Studio Associato
Main Bottlenecks in RIS3 Design and how to Overcome Them Dr. Štefan VRÁTNY, BIC Bratislava S 3 Design Learning Workshop Chisinau Chisinau,
Balancing Objectives and Needs of Industry and Academia: the Role of Government Presentation by Mary Cryan Meeting of National Councils for S&T Policy.
Coordination of health care in the EU Jakub Wtorek European Commission Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit: Active Ageing,
OVERVIEW OF THE EU SME POLICY Multicountry seminar on SME development policies Budapest, 30 November, 2005 Maarit Nyman European Commission DG Enterprise.
HoCare Kick-off Meeting , PRAGUE, CZ
The NETIM Monitoring Tool
Stefano Fantacone President of Lazio Innova
Investigacion e Innovacion
Circular economy in CENTRO (PT)
Innovation.bg 2007 The Bulgarian Innovation System in the EU
Assoc. Prof. Evgeni Evgeniev, PhD
Visions for Open Innovation:
REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
Projekt jednako razvoj d.o.o.
EU-LAC Policy Dialogue: Background for the process
Macro-regional strategies Rapporteur: Etele Baráth Dr
ARTEMIS Industry Association & ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking
– potential relevant financial allocations
EU Research and Innovation: Horizon 2020
Stairway to Excellence JRC.B3 Territorial Development
STOA Workshop New Technologies and Regional Policy Marek Przeor Smart & Sustainable Growth DG Regional and Urban Policy European Commission.
FP9 : TOWARDS A NEW DEAL BETWEEN terrItorial ecosystems AND EUROPEAN POLICIES Christophe Clergeau Member of Pays de la Loire Regional Council – France.
The future of smart specialisation Maximising Europe’s Innovation Potential Stockholm, 18 April 2018 Peter Berkowitz Directorate General for Regional.
Cohesion Policy and Cities
Goal of Action Plan Implementation
Brussels-Capital Region
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
I3U Work Package 6 Commitments 24/25, 26, 27 and 28 WIIW, WERI and ZSI
Background information
ESF Committee 06 October 2017 UEAPME position for post 2020 ESIF and cohesion policy Liliane Volozinskis UEAPME Director Social affairs and Training.
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
The SDGs in Flanders November 27, 2018.
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
SuperBIO: Evaluation Els Van de Velde
Smart Specialisation: monitoring and evaluation Marek Przeor DG Regional and Urban Policy 24 January 2019 #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion.
Smart Specialisation: monitoring and evaluation
ARTEMIS Industry Association & ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking
Social services for the active inclusion of disadvantaged people
The European political-economic governance Thematic orientation implementation programs A New Start, short term macroeconomic coordination 1-3.
New Trends in the Innovation Policy in the European Union
The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE
Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation of the Slovak Republic Mgr. Martin Svoboda
HORIZON 2020 The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation John Cleuren DG Research and Innovation.
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Interim evaluation of RIS3 in
Anna Leiškalne Department of Higher Education, Science and Innovation
Presentation transcript:

S3 Targeted Support – LAGREG Horizontal Activities 20th February 2019, Madrid, Spain Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national Insights from the multi-level tensions in the Portuguese case Hugo Pinto hpinto@ces.uc.pt

Implementation of RIS3 in Portugal Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national Implementation of RIS3 in Portugal Portugal was one of the EU member-states that implemented a multi-level governance system for the development of its smart specialisation strategy. From the beginning there were two parallel but somewhat detached processes for the RIS3 development. At regional level, CCDRs, the regional agencies that manage the regional operational programmes were fast in adapting to the "RIS3 movement" and adopting the principles of smart specialisation to develop more or less robust place-based strategies. At country level, national agencies, such as IAPMEI, FCT and ANI, tried to retain for themselves some control of the RIS3 process and presented a national strategy, the so-called ENEI - Estratégia nacional de especialização inteligente that worked to fulfil the ex-ante criteria for ESIF access during 2014-2020 in this member-state. Regional RIS3, even if deeper and consolidated, were presented as an appendix of ENEI.

Implementation of RIS3 in Portugal Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national Implementation of RIS3 in Portugal Today is consensual among Portuguese key stakeholders that some tensions in the RIS3 process emerged from that initial moment and that the multi-level articulation and governance needs revision. The challenges for RIS3 in peripheral regions are even greater. One of these challenges regards obviously governance, as commonly institutional frameworks are not mature, relevant actors lack of key capabilities, often there are actors or functions missing in the ecosystem, and a chronical lack of financial resources to implement an ambitious agenda for structural change such as any RIS3 can be.

The RIS3 Multi-Level Governance in Centro (PT)

Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national Centro (capital: Coimbra) is spread over 28,000 km2 and has around 2.3 million inhabitants, approximately 31% of Portugal's total area and 22% of the population. Centro has a strategic position since it is situated between the two major cities: Lisboa and Porto. ESIF in R&I per year and per capita Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS) 2017 Centro classified as a “Moderate + Innovator” region, with innovation performance decreasing over time. Best performing indicators Non-R&D innovation expenditures SMEs introducing product/process innovations and marketing/organizational innovations SMEs innovating in-house Innovative SMEs collaborating Lower than EU scores but higher when compared to Portugal Exports of medium-high/high-tech (MHT) manufacturing Sales new-to-market innovations R&D expenditures business sector Worst performances both relative to Portugal and the EU Employment in MHT manufacturing and knowledge-intensive services Design applications Performed poorly when compared to the EU but similar scores to Portugal EPO patent applications Public-private co-publications Indicator (2016) CENTRO PT EU-28 High-Tech Sectors (employment) 1,9% 2,8% 4,0% Human Resources in Science and Technology (% total population) 23,5% 25,4% 33,2% Source: Eurostat

MATERIALS ICT FOREST TOURISM HEALTH BIOTECH AGRO-INDUSTRY SEA Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national Thematic domains MATERIALS ICT FOREST TOURISM HEALTH BIOTECH AGRO-INDUSTRY SEA Transversal priorities Sustainability of resources Qualification of human resources Territorial cohesion Internationalization

Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national

Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national A CONNECTION CIRCLE FOR RIS3 MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE Multi-level governance in RIS3 is characterized by a large number of actors, organizations, agendas and policies, at different levels, local-regional-national-European, to be coordinated in order to achieve a coherent strategy and implementation. This can be characterized as a complex situation. We lack of information and have an incomplete understanding about how RIS3 multi-level governance really works (natural complexity). The process also depends on the interaction of multiple variables over time (dynamic complexity). Based in interviews to key stakeholders at national and regional level content analysis provided insights for the crucial challenges and dimensions to be addressed for the implementation of an effective RIS3 governance system.

Smart specialisation interactions between the regional and the national CONCLUSIONS the need of a deeper reflection on the linkages between the priorities at national and regional level. the continuous revision of the document and implementation of the ENEI. the actual implementation of multi-level governance mechanisms – including EDP or monitoring - that are referred in the written documents  but not yet fully translated into action.

hpinto@ces.uc.pt CES | Alta Colégio de S. Jerónimo Apartado 3087 3000-995 Coimbra Portugal T +351 239 855 570 www.ces.uc.pt ces@ces.uc.pt CES | Sofia Colégio da Graça Rua da Sofia, 136-138 3000-389 Coimbra Portugal T +351 239 853 649 www.ces.uc.pt ces@ces.uc.pt CES | Lisboa Picoas Plaza Rua Viriato, 13 Lj 117/118 1050-227 Lisboa Portugal T +351 216 012 848 www.ces.uc.pt/ces-lisboa ceslx@ces.uc.pt