Formative Progress Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Advertisements

Pre-Service Teacher Goal Setting Agreement University of Cincinnati Teacher Preparation Programs.
What it means for New Teachers
Based on Survey Feedback from LEAs Examples:  Copy Rosters for a Teacher: ◦ Able to copy over a teacher’s entire roster to another subject area  Update.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
The Assessment Rubric in KEEP August 7, 2013 Adobe Connect Webinar Bill Bagshaw - KSDE Kayeri Akweks - KSDE.
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
National Quality Framework Self-assessment and Quality Improvement Planning Podcast Series: 2 April 2012 Draft and Confidential 1.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Thank you for joining us for Small Group Instruction The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
KUD Know –Purpose of the Model Core Curriculum –Our Timeline and Action Plan –Expectations for aligning Model Core Curriculum Essential Concepts or Skill.
LOGO Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Conferencing and Feedback.
Performance Excellence Update Colorado College In The Loop November 15, 2012.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
MN State Network Meeting State Updates Fall 2015
Chapin Hall All-Staff Meeting February 4, 2010 Performance and Development Cycle Human Resources.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Welcome to 6 th Grade Math! Meet Mr. Naiker  Welcome to our classroom!  3 rd year teacher (and 3 rd year Viking!)
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Welcome to the ED LAB!. Reading & Math Lab Class #6.
Orientation 1. 1.A New System for Ohio 2.What is Residency? 3.Why Residency? 4.Ohio Resident Educator Program 5.Ohio’s Resident Educator: “What do I need.
The Common Core Knowledge and Practice Survey Core Advocate Webinar September 15, :00 – 8:00 EDT The webinar will begin shortly. You may wish to.
1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
What it means for New Teachers
Polices, procedures & protocols
Administrative Unit Review
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
Welcome to the ED LAB!.
Professional Growth Plans
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Ohio Department of Higher Education Spring 2017 Update to OCTEO
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
An Introduction to NETS*T
MENTORING PROGRAM 2016.
Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Five Required Elements
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Core Competencies: Moving forward with Self-Assessment
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
State Board of Education Progress Update
Assessment Coordinators Meeting September 18, 2018 Seth Anthony, Interim Director, Office of Academic Excellence Janette Isaacson, Chair, Executive.
Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)
Resident Educator Program
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

Formative Progress Review 2012

Welcome Welcome to the Resident Educator Year 1 Formative Progress Review (FPR) information webinar. This webinar acts as an introduction to the Resident Educator Year 1 Formative Progress Review (FPR), the formative benchmark for Resident Educators in Year 1.

Overview This Formative Progress Review provides an opportunity for Resident Educators, mentors, and program coordinators to: Synthesize evidence of practice Reflect on collaborative effectiveness Identify areas of growth in Year 2 of the RE Program The Resident Educator FPR formalizes and aligns to the professional practices of collaborative conversations, inquiry, formative assessment and reflection that have occurred throughout the year between Resident Educators and mentors. This formative Progress Review provides an opportunity for Resident Educators, mentors, and program coordinators to synthesize evidence of practice, reflect on collaborative effectiveness, and identify areas of growth in Year 2 of the Resident Educator Program.

The Formative Progress Review The FPR document, which must be completed by all Resident Educators, mentors, and program coordinators, can be found on the Resident Educator webpage.

FPR Guidance Document A guidance document accompanies the FPR and reviews the information discussed earlier in this webinar as well as directions for how the RE, mentor, and program coordinator should complete the FPR .

Purpose The Year 1 FPR requires: Resident Educator Mentor Synthesis of evidence Present findings regarding professional growth Mentor Reflect on RE’s professional growth Self reflection by mentors Program Coordinator Identify emerging trends and patterns of professional development needs for Year 2 The Resident Educator Year 1 FPR requires: Resident Educators to synthesize their evidence and formally present their findings regarding their professional growth for Year 1. Mentors will reflect on the professional growth of Resident Educators and their own mentoring effectiveness. Finally, program coordinators will consider the effect of collaborative work between mentors and Resident Educators and identify emergent trends and patterns of professional development needs for Resident Educators Year 2.

Process Resident Educators and mentors should collaborate to complete the FPR together. Resident Educators and mentors should collaborate to complete the FPR together as the process is an extension of the collaborative conversations they have engaged in throughout Year 1 of the Ohio Resident Educator Program.

Preparation Throughout Year 1 of Resident Educator Programs, the Resident Educator should : Reflect on their practice Consider progress and challenges Save relevant evidence Prepare for the FPR Throughout Year 1 of the Resident Educator Program, Resident Educators should be continuously reflecting on their practice, considering both their progress and challenges and thoughtfully completing and saving relevant evidence beyond the required formative assessment documents. Preparing sufficiently for the FPR during the year will greatly assist Resident Educators in completing the FPR at the end of the year.

Timeline Because there are multiple steps in the FPR, be sure to allow sufficient time to reflect on and respond to each prompt. To ensure each step is completed, it is suggested that each person “check off” each action as he or she accomplishes it. No sooner than April 1 of Year 1, Resident Educators, mentors, and program coordinators should begin the process of completing the Year 1 Resident Educator Formative Progress Review. No later than June 1 of Year 1 mentors should provide the completed FPR form to RE program coordinators. No later than June 30 of Year 1, Program coordinators should first confirm in CORE that the Year 1 FPR has been completed and then provide a copy to the mentor and Resident Educator.

Please Note It is important to note the Resident Educator Year 1 Formative Progress Review is not to be used for evaluation purposes. It is the property of the Resident Educator and will not be submitted to ODE.

Completion of the FPR The Formative Progress Review is a formative benchmark of the Resident Educators Progress. An RE cannot “fail” the Formative Progress Review. It is meant to serve as a formative benchmark of the Resident Educators Progress, which can help inform the RE’s professional development for Year 2.

Next Step District Program Coordinator ODE website: Program Questions: www.residenteducator.education.ohio.gov Program Questions: REProgram@education.ohio.gov ODE has provided a Year 2 Professional Development Planning , which will help inform the professional development needed for both mentors and REs for Year 2. Please watch for regular updates, which will be sent to all program coordinators as well as posted on the Resident Educator webpage

“How can I be a better educator tomorrow than I am today?” The one question to never stop asking… Thank you. “How can I be a better educator tomorrow than I am today?”