• Student Participation • $150 per student

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
San Juan High School Intermediate Intervention/Under-performing School Program By Mike Peebles, Teacher Partial fulfillment of ED251 Instructors: Duane.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
FASPA Conference October, 2010 Implementing a Salary Differential Program.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) Overview Adapted from LACOE Intervention for for Persistently Lowest- Achieving Schools 1.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Marshall Public Schools World’s Best Workforce September 2014.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Understanding Title I. Title I Defined A federal allocation of funds for schools classified as low income for the purpose of assisting students to demonstrate.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Update on the i3 grant The Sunnyside District should receive word by the end of July on our application for a $30 million federal Investing in Innovation.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Meeting Private School Student Participation Requirements Under Title III West Virginia Department of Education.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 School Participation in Federal and State Accountability Programs Immediate Intervention/Underperforming.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
BTSA/GATE/NBC Update Donna R. Simien Specialist January 18, 2006.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Academic Performance Index Improved Schools Award Eligible Schools Renée E. Jackson Superintendent of Schools Local District G October 18, 2000.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Title I Dearborn Public Schools October 9, 2013 ASC Board Room.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
S , F.S., Requirements for Employee Compensation and Salary Schedules Florida Department of Education May 23,
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Indiana Area School District
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Overview of the Title I, Part A Program at [school name]
Title I Annual Meeting Federal Programs Director: Brenda Dail
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
AYP and Report Card.
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Proposed Expenditure Budget
Anderson Elementary School
Standardized Testing & Reporting
ELEMENTARY MATH UPDATE
PRESENTED BY: FELICIA CLARK 5/15/02
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
AYP and Report Card.
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
ELEMENTARY MATH UPDATE
District Mathematics Plan
Presentation transcript:

• Student Participation • $150 per student STATE MANDATORY AWARDS PROGRAMS I. Governor’s Performance Award (GPA) • Schoolwide Use • Meets targets • Student Participation • $150 per student • Use determined by existing governance team • Ongoing

• Eligibility for GPA will determine eligibility SCHOOL SITE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE BONUS • All staff/schoolwide • Eligibility for GPA will determine eligibility • All sites (FTE) will receive • Equal amount for schoolwide • Use determined by existing governance • One-time bonus

CERTIFICATED STAFF PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE ACT • Schools in deciles 1-5 in 1999 • 1998-99 Stanford 9 growth must be demonstrated • Meet or exceed 2 times annual growth target (1999-2000) • Subgroups meet/exceed 80% of 2 times the target • Student Participation • Biggest gains - Largest awards • Based on growth • 1,000 - $25,000 3750 - $10,000 7500 - $5,000

(Note: total is $100 million) • Inclusion of certificated personnel decided by District in negotiation with the Union • Ongoing

FUNDING SUPPORT TO SCHOOLS 1. School Improvement (Program Improvement) -State 2. Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP) - State 3. District Support - District 4. Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program (CSRDP) - Federal

• Based on schools identified in 1997-98 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Program Improvement • $50,000 under 999 • $69,415 above 1,000 • Based on schools identified in 1997-98 • Improvement in 2 out of 3 years • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • For 1999-2000 school year - did you meet the API • Yes/No?

• Must have a model/external evaluator • Will know by mid-October Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program (II/USP) • District application • $50,000 • State selected • Must have a model/external evaluator • Will know by mid-October

• Promised for a three year period DISTRICT SUPPORT • $50,000 • District support • Promised for a three year period beginning school 1999-2000 • Second year

COMPRESHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM (CSRDP) Due in April/ May

Adequate Yearly Progress - Title I 1997-98 Cohorts YES NO Audubon Hyde Park Bright La Salle Budlong Manual Arts Cienega Menlo Cimarron Mid-City Clay Muir 54th 95th 52nd 74th 42nd Vermont Foshay Weemes Hillcrest West Athens Western Woodcrest Angeles Mesa 6th Ave Bradley Virginia Rd Rd Century Park Coliseum 59th Harte Magnolia Manhattan Pl Mann Normandie Norwood Raymond

No Longer Program Improvement 54th Clay 42nd Foshay Hyde Park Menlo Mid-City 95th Vermont

MATRIX OF FUNDING DISTRICT P.I. II/USP 59th X X 74th X Angeles Mesa X X Western X 6th Ave X Bradley X Coliseum X Cienega X Hillcrest X

MATRIX OF FUNDING DISTRICT P.I. II/USP Virginia Rd X Magnolia X Bright X Budlong X 52nd X King X Normandie X X X Norwood X Century Park X Cimarron X

MATRIX OF FUNDING DISTRICT P.I. II/USP LaSalle X Manhattan Pl X Raymond X X West Athens X Woodcrest X Audubon Muir X Harte X X X Mann X Dorsey /59th Street X X