The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deborah L. Berry, Eric H. Baehrecke  Cell 
Advertisements

Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Christina D. Cota, Brad Davidson  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Distinct Mechanisms of Apoptosis-Induced Compensatory Proliferation in Proliferating and Differentiating Tissues in the Drosophila Eye  Yun Fan, Andreas.
Eva Decotto, Allan C. Spradling  Developmental Cell 
Apoptotic Cells Can Induce Compensatory Cell Proliferation through the JNK and the Wingless Signaling Pathways  Hyung Don Ryoo, Travis Gorenc, Hermann.
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages (March 2015)
A Pulse of the Drosophila Hox Protein Abdominal-A Schedules the End of Neural Proliferation via Neuroblast Apoptosis  Bruno C. Bello, Frank Hirth, Alex.
Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Vicki P. Losick, Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Drosophila piwi Mutants Exhibit Germline Stem Cell Tumors that Are Sustained by Elevated Dpp Signaling  Zhigang Jin, Alex S. Flynt, Eric C. Lai  Current.
Yorkie and Scalloped Signaling Regulates Notch-Dependent Lineage Specification during Drosophila Hematopoiesis  Gabriel B. Ferguson, Julian A. Martinez-Agosto 
Anne Sustar, Gerold Schubiger  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Tissue Repair through Cell Competition and Compensatory Cellular Hypertrophy in Postmitotic Epithelia  Yoichiro Tamori, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Thiazolidinediones Regulate Adipose Lineage Dynamics
Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Molecular Analysis of Stem Cells and Their Descendants during Cell Turnover and Regeneration in the Planarian Schmidtea mediterranea  George T. Eisenhoffer,
Dedifferentiating Spermatogonia Outcompete Somatic Stem Cells for Niche Occupancy in the Drosophila Testis  X. Rebecca Sheng, Crista M. Brawley, Erika.
Intestinal Stem Cell Pool Regulation in Drosophila
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
DFezf/Earmuff Maintains the Restricted Developmental Potential of Intermediate Neural Progenitors in Drosophila  Mo Weng, Krista L. Golden, Cheng-Yu Lee 
Control of Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Eye by Notch Signaling
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Todd Nystul, Allan Spradling  Cell Stem Cell 
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
In Vivo Analysis of Centromeric Proteins Reveals a Stem Cell-Specific Asymmetry and an Essential Role in Differentiated, Non-proliferating Cells  Ana.
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal  Judith L. Leatherman,
The Snail Family Member Worniu Is Continuously Required in Neuroblasts to Prevent Elav-Induced Premature Differentiation  Sen-Lin Lai, Michael R. Miller,
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Lethal Giant Larvae Acts Together with Numb in Notch Inhibition and Cell Fate Specification in the Drosophila Adult Sensory Organ Precursor Lineage  Nicholas.
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Short-Range Cell Interactions and Cell Survival in the Drosophila Wing
Marisa M. Merino, Christa Rhiner, Marta Portela, Eduardo Moreno 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Devendra S. Mistry, Yifang Chen, George L. Sen  Cell Stem Cell 
Christine E. Hochmuth, Benoit Biteau, Dirk Bohmann, Heinrich Jasper 
Benoît Biteau, Heinrich Jasper  Cell Reports 
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Benjamin J. Matthews, Wesley B. Grueber  Current Biology 
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (May 2001)
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Elena M. Lucchetta, Benjamin Ohlstein  Cell Stem Cell 
David P. Doupé, Allon M. Klein, Benjamin D. Simons, Philip H. Jones 
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Heidi S. Bretscher, Donald T. Fox  Developmental Cell 
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Brent S. Wells, Eri Yoshida, Laura A. Johnston  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 290-297 (September 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.003 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Similar Larval and Adult Hindgut Anatomy (A and B) The general structure of the larval hindgut (A) and the adult hindgut (B) is shown. The major hindgut subdivisions and the pyloric rings are indicated. The yellow line denotes the midgut/hindgut boundary. (C) A representative lacZ clone (green) induced in the first instar and analyzed in L3. (D and E) Wg protein (green, cytoplasmic) is highly expressed in 1–3 rows of anterior ring cells in the pylorus of both larvae (D) and adults (E). Prospero-positive enteroendocrine cells (green, nuclear in E) mark the midgut, which lies anterior to the ring. More posterior ring cells strongly express byn-Gal4::UAS-GFP (purple). The separate channels are shown for a section indicated by the dashed box in (E′) (Wg, green) and (E″) (byn-GAL4::UAS-GFP, purple). (F) Posterior larval ring cells express the Notch activation reporter GBE-Su(H) lacZ (green). (G) The adult ring, in contrast, does not express GBE-Su(H) lacZ (green). All panels, anterior to left; DAPI, nuclei (white). Scale bars represent 100 μm (white) and 12.5 μm (red). Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 290-297DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.003) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Separate Progenitors Produce the Adult Pylorus and Ileum (A) The clone induction scheme used to study adult hindgut progenitors. (B) The size of pyloric clones induced during pupal development does not change significantly during adulthood. (C) Pyloric (blue) and ileal (red) clones induced during late larval development (L3) are small and decline further in size when induced after pupal day 1 (P1). (D) The number of pyloric clones per gut induced by a standard heat shock increases during pupal development. (E–G) Examples of clones induced in late larvae or pupae and analyzed in adults. (E) Adult pylorus showing an L3 pyloric clone (yellow bracket) in contact with the posterior boundary of the Wg ring (dashed line). (F) Adult pylorus showing six P1 pyloric clones, four of which do not contact the Wg ring (boundary shown by dashed line). (G) P1 ileal clones, showing small size (1–2 cells). (H) Rare large spontaneous clone spanning pylorus and ileum. (I) Example of large lacZ clone induced during embryogenesis. (J) Proposed fate map of the larval pylorus. All images, anterior to the left. DAPI (purple), clones (green) were labeled with membrane GFP (E, H) or nuclear lacZ (F, G, I). n > 70 clones/time point. Scale bars represent 25 μm. All error bars indicate standard deviation. Life cycle image adapted from http://flymove.uni-muenster.de/ Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 290-297DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.003) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Adult Hindgut Is Not Maintained by Active Stem Cells (A) Experimental plan for continuous or pulse chase BrdU labeling studies; green arrow indicates BrdU addition, red arrow indicates tissue analysis. (B) Percentage of BrdU-positive cells (average ± standard deviation) in hindgut (HG) and midgut (MG) after 7 days of BrdU exposure. (C) BrdU incorporation after continuous labeling in the hindgut appears sporadic and is limited to the pylorus. White lines indicate pyloric boundary. (D) Widespread BrdU incorporation in the midguts of the same animals. (E) Slow turnover of BrdU-labeled cells in hindguts compared to the midguts of the same animals following the pulse-chase protocol. n > 23 guts/time point. (F) Absence of significant posterior cell movement over a 20-day period. The mean cell position of BrdU-positive cells along the proximal-distal axes of the pylorus (30 cell diameters long) or the ileum (60 cell diameters long) at day 2 versus day 21. n > 200 pyloric and > 100 ileal cells/time point. (G and H) A hindgut 1 day (G) after the BrdU pulse (D2), or 20 days (H) after pulse (D21). Arrows indicate ileal labeling; white lines indicate pyloric boundary. (I and J) A midgut 1 day (I) after the BrdU pulse (D2) or 20 days (J) after pulse (D21). (K) The increase in the number of MARCM clones 21 days after adult heat-shock, normalized to the number of clones in non-heat-shocked controls. No increase is seen in the hindgut, unlike the stem cell-based midgut where the number of clones is strongly increased. (L) The number of lacZ clones induced in 4-day-old adults per gut is stable during adulthood. 12–34 animals were scored at each time point. All images, anterior to the left; DAPI, purple; BrdU, green. Scale bars represent 50 μm. All error bars indicate standard deviation. Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 290-297DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.003) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Pylorus Proliferates in Response to Damage (A–H) Adults of the genotype UAS hid rpr ; Gal80ts ; byn-GAL4 UAS-GFP were shifted to 30°C to induce damage in the hindgut. (A) Punctate nuclei of dying pyloric cells (arrows) 2 days after damage induction. (B) The number of BrdU-labeled adult hindgut cells (average ± standard deviation) is greatly increased after damage induction (+), relative to controls lacking hid and rpr expression (−). Note: A Tub-GAL4 FLP-out system was substituted for byn-GAL4 in one experiment (see I). (C) BrdU incorporation occurs preferentially in the adult pyloric Wg ring (bracket) 1 day after damage induction. (D) BrdU incorporation in the adult pylorus 2 days after damage induction is seen both in the Wg ring (bracket) and more posteriorly. (E) Adult pyloric cells shifted to the nonpermissive temperature and labeled with BrdU for 1 day (as in C) were examined after 4 additional days at 18°C. Labeled cells are now seen throughout the pylorus. Bracket indicates Wg ring. (F) The mean position of BrdU-labeled cells after 1 day of damage (D1, see C) and after 5 days (D5, see E) demonstrates cell movement. (G) Cells positive for phosphohistone H3 (PH3) (average ± standard deviation) are greatly increased in adult hindguts after damage induction (+), relative to controls lacking hid and rpr expression (−). (H) Cell division marked by PH3 (green) 2 days after damage induction is confined to the Wg ring (bracket). (I) BrdU incorporation 1 day after the induction of FLP-out clones marked with GFP (pink) and expressing hid and rpr (full genotype indicated). BrdU incorporation (green) is observed within the Wg ring (bracket) in unrecombined cells adjacent to GFP-expressing cells (see inset). All images, anterior to the left. Dashed box, region shown in inset. In (D), (E), and (H), GFP (purple) indicates byn expression; in (I), GFP indicates UAS hid,rpr positive. Abbreviations: Pros, Prospero; Wg, Wingless. Scale bars represent 25 μm (white) and 12.5 μm (red). All error bars indicate standard deviation. Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 290-297DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.003) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions