Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Advertisements

Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Changes in markers associated with dendritic cells driving the differentiation of either TH2 cells or regulatory T cells correlate with clinical benefit.
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Bart Tummers, Renske Goedemans, Veena Jha, Craig Meyers, Cornelis J. M
Pathways Responsible for Human Autoantibody and Therapeutic Intravenous IgG Activity in Humanized Mice  Inessa Schwab, Anja Lux, Falk Nimmerjahn  Cell.
Repeated FcεRI triggering reveals modified mast cell function related to chronic allergic responses in tissue  Jolien Suurmond, MSc, Kim L.L. Habets,
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
A Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of the Human Pancreas
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Integrated analysis of miRNA and mRNA during differentiation of human CD34+ cells delineates the regulatory roles of microRNA in hematopoiesis  Nalini.
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
The Role of Dendritic Cells in S
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Changes in markers associated with dendritic cells driving the differentiation of either TH2 cells or regulatory T cells correlate with clinical benefit.
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Transcriptional Profiling of Quiescent Muscle Stem Cells In Vivo
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
A Regulatory Feedback between Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells and Regulatory B Cells Is Aberrant in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus  Madhvi Menon, Paul A. Blair,
SUMO Signaling by Hypoxic Inactivation of SUMO-Specific Isopeptidases
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Express Receptors for Anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a and Are Chemoattracted to C3a and C5a  Ralf Gutzmer, Brigitta Köther,
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Initiating Events in Direct Cardiomyocyte Reprogramming
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 13, Pages e6 (December 2018)
Human Inflammatory Dendritic Cells Induce Th17 Cell Differentiation
Directed Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Microglia
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
TNF Counterbalances the Emergence of M2 Tumor Macrophages
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
IL-4 and IL-13 Alter Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Responsiveness to CpG DNA and Herpes Simplex Virus-1  Jurjen Tel, Ruurd Torensma, Carl G. Figdor, I.
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
CD4+CLA+CD103+ T cells from human blood and skin share a transcriptional profile. CD4+CLA+CD103+ T cells from human blood and skin share a transcriptional.
MK-8628 suppresses T lymphocyte proliferation.
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (December 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2019)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Endogenous Control of Immunity against Infection: Tenascin-C Regulates TLR4- Mediated Inflammation via MicroRNA-155  Anna M. Piccinini, Kim S. Midwood 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 2953-2966 (September 2016) Proteomics of Human Dendritic Cell Subsets Reveals Subset-Specific Surface Markers and Differential Inflammasome Function  Kuntal Worah, Till S.M. Mathan, Thien Phong Vu Manh, Shivakumar Keerthikumar, Gerty Schreibelt, Jurjen Tel, Tjitske Duiveman- de Boer, Annette E. Sköld, Annemiek B. van Spriel, I. Jolanda M. de Vries, Martijn A. Huynen, Hans J. Wessels, Jolein Gloerich, Marc Dalod, Edwin Lasonder, Carl G. Figdor, Sonja I. Buschow  Cell Reports  Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 2953-2966 (September 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023 Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2016 16, 2953-2966DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Comparison of Protein Expression between Three Main Blood DC-like Subsets and Integration with RNA Data (A) Volcano plots depicting protein expression differences (x axis: log2 fold change) and the significance level (y axis: −log10 t test p value). Colored dots represent proteins with a fold change of >2 and p < 0.05; proteins in gray did not meet these criteria. Proteins specific to one of the two subsets compared were assigned a fold change of infinity. See also Table S4. (B) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of DC subsets using all proteins (1 − Pearson correlation). (C) Clustering of subsets based on 1,218 DEPs (based on three-group one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05, or specific expression). (D) Pearson correlation between protein and RNA (microarray) expression levels. (E) Hierarchical clustering of merged transcriptome and proteome data (DEPs only). See also Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. Cell Reports 2016 16, 2953-2966DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cell-Specific Gene Signatures Derived from Proteomics and Transcriptomics (A–F) Protein-based gene signatures for higher or lower expression in the three main subsets derived from merged proteome and transcriptome data based on four evidence levels: (I) specific protein expression/absence with RNA support; (II) differential protein expression with RNA support; (III) specific protein expression without RNA support; and (IV) differential protein expression without RNA support. Proteins marked by asterisks were specifically identified by MS in two donors only but were included because of RNA support (e.g., “rescued”). The heatmap colors represent relative protein expression (LFQ) in each DC subset and donor. See also Table S7. Cell Reports 2016 16, 2953-2966DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Signature PPI Networks Highlight Functional Differences between Subsets (A–E) Signatures were used as input for STRING PPI analysis (confidence level, 0.4) to visualize possible connections between proteins. (See Table S9.) Proteins indicated in blue were included based on protein and RNA data, and red proteins were pointed out by protein data only (see also Experimental Procedures and Table S7). Important biological functions of sections of each network are indicated (based on FA analysis). See also Table S9. Cell Reports 2016 16, 2953-2966DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Pairwise Comparison of BDCA3+ mDCs and CD1c+ mDCs (A) Volcano plot depicting protein expression differences (x axis: log2 fold change) and the significance level (y axis: −log10 t test p value) as in Figure 1. (B) Pearson correlation between protein and RNA (microarray) expression levels. (C) Hierarchical clustering of merged Z-score transcriptome and proteome data of DEPs. (D and E) Heatmaps of the relative protein expression (LFQ) of proteins identified to be specifically (levels I and III) or differentially (level II or IV; by t test) expressed in either mDC subset, based on protein and RNA evidence (levels I and II) or protein evidence only (levels III and IV). See also Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. Cell Reports 2016 16, 2953-2966DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Confirmation of Differentially Expressed Surface Markers (A) Representative histogram of the expression of indicated surface markers by specific antibodies (lines) or isotype controls (gray area) on the four subsets. (B) Bar diagrams summarizing the fluorescence level measured by flow cytometry (FC) in four independent healthy donors (isotype control antibody signal subtracted; mean ± SEM). All markers were found differentially expressed by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) and between pairs of subsets with indicated significance by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ < 0.001. (C) Bar diagrams of mean LFQ values, as obtained by MS analysis (three donors; mean ± SEM). Cell Reports 2016 16, 2953-2966DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Absence of Caspase and Inflammasome Activity in pDCs (A) Diagrams of LFQ values for caspase-1, as obtained by MS analysis (three donors; mean). (B and C) Western blot analysis of DC subsets isolated by flow sorting from two independent donors lysed (B) directly after isolation or (C) after overnight stimulation with R848. Shown are the signals for caspase-1 and actin probed sequentially on one membrane. (D) Heatmap of log2 intensity values by microarray of probes mapping to inflammasome components (three donors). (E) Flow cytometry evaluation of surface expression of CD83 on immature or R848/ATP-stimulated (4 hr, 45 min) subsets. Results of a representative donor are shown. (F and G) Secretion of indicated cytokines by pDCs and CD1c mDC after stimulation for 4 hr (F) or overnight (G) with R848, followed by 45 min with ATP, by ELISA. Mean values ± SEM from at least four donors. Significance was evaluated by a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ns, non-significant. See also Figures S3 and S4. Cell Reports 2016 16, 2953-2966DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.023) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions