Why OFDM for the High Rate b Extension?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /315 Submission September 2000 Jim Zyren, IntersilSlide 1 Regulatory Ad Hoc Group Report Scottsdale, AZ, USA September 2000.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /249 Submission May 2001 Zyren, Webster, Halford Intersil FCC Further Notice ET Docket Zyren, Webster, Halford Intersil.
Rules on ECO STYLE Logo Usage. Eco Style is the only eco related logo that can be used. We may no longer use Eco Innovation. Logo to be used only as a.
Doc.: IEEE /396 Submission November 2000 S. Halford, P. Chiuchiolo, G. Dooley, and M. WebsterSlide 1 Implementation and Complexity Issues for.
Doc.: IEEE /480r0 Submission July 2002 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco Systems, et alSlide 1 Preparation of PAR and 5 Criterion addressing Japan’s 4.9-5GHz.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice HallChapter Writing and Completing Reports and Proposals.
Phantom Works Mathematics & Computing Technology November 99 Richard Paine,Boeing Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /258 Submission 5.15 GHz Update.
Doc.: IEEE /188 Submission July 2000 Jan Boer, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band Jan Boer, Lucent Technologies.
Doc.: IEEE /0240r0 Submission January 2015 Jim Lansford, CSR TechnologySlide 1 IEEE Regulatory SC DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team Final Report.
Doc.: IEEE /295 Submission September 2000 Jim Zyren, IntersilSlide 1 FCC Update: NPRM Regulatory Ad Hoc Group Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Doc.: IEEE /0001r00 Agenda January 2016 Jay Holcomb, Itron Inc. IEEE RR-TAG Teleconference Agenda Date: 11 January 2016 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /388 Submission November 2000 Jim Zyren, IntersilSlide 1 TGg Regulatory Approval Plan.
Doc.: IEEE /392 Submission November 2000 K. Halford, S. Halford and M. Webster, IntersilSlide 1 OFDM System Performance Karen Halford, Steve Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /759r0 Submission November 2002 Bruce Kraemer, Intersil TK Tan, PhilipsSlide 1 Proposal to Amend a to address Japanese bands.
Presentation Guidelines
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Channelization for HRb OFDM
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc>
Unit 3, Lesson 8 Making Presentations That Get Attention
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Update
Worldwide 5GHz Requirements
Bid/No-Bid Recommendation(s)
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
RTCA SC-202 WG6 Summary to IEEE
IEEE /777 Steve Halford Jim Zyren
TGg Report to WG September 22, 2000
Enabling signal and enablement
PowerPoint charting. Done right.
Why OFDM for the High Rate b Extension?
Chapter 7: Producing Your Proposal
Evaluating Channel Estimation Sensitivity
Range & Rate of CCK-OFDM
120MHz channelization solution
OFDM High Rate Extension Zyren, Webster, Halford
Jim Zyren Mark Webster Steve Halford Intersil Corporation
UWB Teleconference Report
MHz FCC Action Date: Authors: March 2005
OFDM System Performance
CCK-OFDM Closing Remarks
CID#102 - Channel Allocation
WNG Closing Plenary Report
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
Use of for 5G Millimeter Wave Systems
CCK-OFDM Summary Steve Halford Mark Webster Jim Zyren Paul Chiuchiolo
IEEE 802 Wireless Coexistence Study Group Tuesday Meeting
HRb SG Status Report to Working Group
May 203 doc.: IEEE r1 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Report on Monday Executive Committee Meeting, July 9, 2001
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
Summary of RTCA SC-202 Discussions with Consumer Electronics Industry
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> January 2012
Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D. IEEE Chairperson
Channel Allocation March 2008 Authors: Date: Month Year
MAC applicability for WirelessHUMAN
5-GHz Unified Protocol (5-UP) Proposal OFDM Extensions for a
White Space Regulatory Issues
September 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 September 2002
4 Channel Special Committee Report
Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Executive Project Kickoff
Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e> January 2012
CCK / OFDM Closing Summary
Interest for HDR extension to a
Technical Feasibility of CCK Extensions for HRb
May 203 doc.: IEEE r2 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Presentation transcript:

Why OFDM for the High Rate 802.11b Extension? doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx November 2000 November 2000 Why OFDM for the High Rate 802.11b Extension? This Style Guide is designed to facilitate the creation of presentations within Intersil graphic guidelines. These presentations may address an external audience, as in a product announcement or industry event, or an internal one, as in seminars or executive committee meetings. In any case, it is important to adhere to a corporate Style Guide. The Style Guide provides standards and guidelines to help project Intersil’s corporate identity. Projecting visual continuity is a key to the success of the company. The Style Guide is based on the capabilities of Microsoft PowerPoint, one of our corporate standard software packages. The following slides and script describe the graphic standards and guidelines for these presentations. This Style Guide will address four key areas: The overall Layout and Design Specifications for placement of text, logo, and graphic treatments (symbols, bar charts and table charts) Recommended Guidelines for using photography and illustration Recommended Color usage and standard palette Jim Zyren, Intersil Jim Zyren, Intersil Jim Zyren, Intersil

Why OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band? Performance November 2000 Why OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band? Performance OFDM is a powerful and proven method OFDM independently selected by 802.11a and HiperLAN2 OFDM provides excellent performance in multipath and AWGN interleaving and error coding result in extremely robust systems Single carrier systems do not scale well for very high rates Equalizer complexity fatally flawed HiperLAN1 Why repeat this mistake? Jim Zyren, Intersil

Why OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band? Data Rates November 2000 Why OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band? Data Rates Consumer demand for bandwidth is insatiable 22 Mbps is better, but it is insufficient for many applications? 5 GHz development is raising market expectations OFDM can scale data rates to >54 Mbps enough bandwidth to remain competitive enough to serve multimedia applications Do we want to go through standards process again in two years? What happens when consumers demand >20 Mbps? In a few years, consumers will demand 54 Mbps, they don’t care about the frequency of operation Jim Zyren, Intersil

Why OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band? Upgrade Path November 2000 Why OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band? Upgrade Path OFDM is already used at 5 GHz IEEE 802.11a and HiperLAN2 Selection of OFDM for 2.4 GHz band provides upgrade path to 5 GHz Dual Band radios become possible! 2.4 GHz infrastructure does not become stranded 2.4 GHz band remains competitive in terms of data rates One radio can work regardless of infrastructure! Good for customers, good for suppliers. Jim Zyren, Intersil

November 2000 FCC Issues All systems with >20 Mbps in current channel width have regulatory approval issues FCC public statements clearly indicate that spectral efficiency is a major issue FCC is publicly considering revision of 15.247 Industry forum to be held in Jan-Feb timeframe FCC has requested input from IEEE 802.11/.15/.16 regarding issues to be placed on forum agenda FCC wants to work with industry to make ALL proposed high rate waveforms legal RAHG has drafted FCC response to be considered at 802.11 plenary tomorrow OFDM on same regulatory footing as other proposals Jim Zyren, Intersil

Marketing Issues What if we DON’T pick OFDM? Somebody else will… November 2000 Marketing Issues What if we DON’T pick OFDM? Somebody else will… The technology is available Data rates are higher Performance in multipath and AWGN is outstanding But, who? HomeRF, proprietary solutions, etc. Many companies are developing OFDM capability IEEE 802.11 will not be a leader in 2.4 GHz band market won’t care about 22 Mbps if 54 Mbps is available from other sources Why concede the 2.4 GHz band to non-802.11 solutions? Jim Zyren, Intersil

Marketing Issues Some long-term thinking… If we pick OFDM … November 2000 Marketing Issues Some long-term thinking… in five years, consumers will be demanding higher data rates how long do we think 22 Mbps will be competitive? or, do we want to do this again next year? If we pick OFDM … 2.4 GHz band remains viable IEEE 802.11 does not “open the door” to competitors Dual Band radios will extend the life of 2.4 GHz infrastructure. Jim Zyren, Intersil

November 2000 Conclusions We will not get a high rate (>20 Mbps) solution approved in the 2.4 GHz band without a rule change OFDM is the right choice right NOW Standard can be in place when FCC gives green light OFDM is the right choice for the future higher data rates great multipath and AWGN performance upgrade path to 5 GHz band Jim Zyren, Intersil