Assessment routes and timelines in Australia (2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Risk management: A EU perspective Lincoln Tsang May 2008.
Advertisements

Pharmaceutical Policy and Pricing: How are Countries Getting Greater Value? Commonwealth Fund/ Alliance for Health Reform Briefing on Capitol Hill Dr.
Registration in Europe Current situation and future outlook Thomas K ü rner, M.D. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
1 The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and the Australian Guidelines; Implications for the United States Deborah A. Freund, Ph.D., MPH Vice Chancellor and.
State Program Improvement Planning Process and Expectations National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement A service of the Children’s.
Professor Stuart Walker BSc PhD MFPM FIBiol FRSC FRCPath FIstD Director CMR International UK.
HTA & Medical Devices: An International Perspective Christina Farup, MD, MS | April 2015.
Biopharmaceutical Regulatory Requirements 40. Marketing Authorization for New Chemical Entities Health Canada’s (HC) Therapeutic Products Directorate.
Electricity Industry Deregulation in Taiwan I. Summary of the Framework of Electricity Industry Liberalization in Taiwan.
1 Value Assessment of Development-Stage Assets Pharmaceutical Products, Medical Devices, and Related Intellectual Property Frank S. Castellana, M.D., Eng.Sc.D.
FDA, PDUFA AND MEDICAL INNOVATION Spring WHAT IS THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA)? The FDA is an agency within the U.S. Department of Health.
Benchmarking Canadian HTA Agency and Provincial Payer Decision-Making Allen N. 1,2, Liberti L. 2, Salek M.S. 1 1 Centre for socioeconomic research, School.
PRODUCT TRANSFER.
Supporting Informed Formulary Decision Making: CADTH’s Common Drug Review Denis Bélanger, Director, CADTH New Brunswick Stroke Summit November 27, 2010,
Investment and portfolio management MGT 531. Investment and portfolio management Lecture # 20.
HTA Benefits and Risks Dr Bernard Merkel European Commission.
IPASA presentation to Portfolio Committee on Health 31 October 2014 Abeda Williams.
Sommaire Innovation Summit Roles for Stakeholders in the Healthcare System July 2010.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK.
PRESENTATION TEMPLATE Suggestions on How to Prepare a Presentation ! Do not use the SMA design of this presentation! SMA ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM 2016 Saskatoon,
Using Australian Clinical Sites – Challenges for International Sponsors Prof A J (Tony) Webber Clinical Network Services Pty Ltd Brisbane, Australia.
Health Technology Assessment for Pharmaceuticals and New Medical Technologies - Where are we now? The industry perspective Jenny Hughes, Director, Vaccines.
Slide 1 The contribution of a world-class regulatory environment to the future of the industry in Ireland Pat O’Mahony Chief Executive, Irish Medicines.
1 PHARMACOVIGILANCE & THE NATIONAL ADVERSE DRUG REACTION (ADR) REPORTING SYSTEM Sarah Spiteri Post-Licensing Directorate Medicines Authority.
Appraisal and Funding of Cancer Drugs from July 2016 (including the new Cancer Drugs Fund) A new deal for patients, taxpayers and industry Tuesday 5 July.
Paediatric Medicine: The Paediatric Investigation Plan
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
Intellectual Property Protection and Access to Medicines
The percentage of NASs approved by CDER
Comparing the registration to reimbursement pathway for new active substances in Europe Germany Poland To help provide a better understanding of the European.
NASs approval time by therapeutic area:
Median 25th and 75th percentile
New economies: Scenarios with a likelihood >50% and impact
Positive Impacts of Developing Novel Endpoints Generated by Mobile Technology for Use in Clinical Trials* SPECIFIC BENEFITS   SHORT-TERM MEDIUM-TERM LONG-TERM.
Median approval time for new active substances approved by ICH agencies by approval year Methodology For each new active substance (NAS) approved between.
Ten Quality Decision-Making Practices for organisational decision making for pharmaceutical company leadership team and sub-teams In order for organisations.
KEY STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTIONS OF HEOR USAGE IN LEBANON
Percentage Key Message
HREC Operating Procedures for the Review of Low and Moderate to High Risk Projects
Median submission gap, median approval time and percentage approved as expedited for new active substances (NASs) approved by six authorities:
Median time to internationalisation
Scientific competence Communication and transparency
This study was conducted using the CIRS EMaRReT database, which tracks new medicines and line extensions in 15 Emerging Markets (Argentina, Brazil, Mexico,
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
New active substance median approval time for six regulatory authorities in Key messages The last decade, , saw a continuation.
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
New active substances approved by EMA and FDA over 10 years
EMA: The European Medicines Agency
Comparing the registration to reimbursement pathway for new active substances in Europe Germany Poland To help provide a better understanding of the European.
From Regulatory Approval to Subsidized Patient Access in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Comparison of Systems Across Australia, China, Japan, Korea, New Zealand,
Research Ethics Service and Confidentiality Advisory Group KPI Report
Type and impact of HTA-related scientific advice given during development The variability in HTA organisations and methodologies that are utilised in HTA.
“Metro Map” analysis of FDA facilitated regulatory pathways and their influence on median approval times  The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has.
Building quality in HTA process and decision making
Value in Health Regional Issues
Rollout time breakdown: 24 common NASs in 7 jurisdictions
INTERNATIONALISATION – FOCUS ON EMA AND FDA
Median, Box : 25th and 75th percentiles
Pharmaceutical Industry Feedback HPRA Performance
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
Assessment of quality decision making in regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies with QoDoS (Quality of Decision Making Orientation Scheme) Not.
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Out of the 52 NASs approved by all six authorities during :
Median times to submission and licensing for 70 new active substances approved in five markets from 1997 to 2010 Note: EMA approval.
Regulatory review process: What are enablers?
2019 CIRS survey: Methodologies to improve decision-making documentation during medicines development and review – gap analysis Do you think your current.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Assessment routes and timelines
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment routes and timelines in Australia (2011) Process map of national-level regulatory and reimbursement systems* Timelines by each agency Median time (days) Review process Median time (days) Regulatory approval 400 Pricing and reimbursement 305 This slide illustrates the median timelines of the review process by regulatory authority and health technology assessment (HTA)/payer agencies for Australia. The process map provides an overview of the national-level regulatory and reimbursement system for new pharmaceutical products. For each product, companies provided data on the dates that the product was submitted to the respective agencies for review and the dates that the companies received information about the decision of these reviews. These dates were used to calculate the review time by individual agencies for each product and subsequently the agencies median review time. Applications can be submitted for HTA assessment prior to the market authorisation decision, however the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) decision will be delayed until the market authorisation decision. The median review overlap (defined as submission to PBAC prior to Therapeutic Goods Administration [TGA] approval) was 50 days. Data derived from CIRS HTA Atlas programme: Process Map Report - A systematic comparison of healthcare systems; CIRS 2011 HTA Industry Benchmarking Report. Number of products = 7 Number of companies = 4 * Data source: CIRS HTA Atlas