Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Advertisements

Thomas Andrillon, Sid Kouider, Trevor Agus, Daniel Pressnitzer 
Regulation of Hippocampal Firing by Network Oscillations during Sleep
Spatial Memory Engram in the Mouse Retrosplenial Cortex
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
GABAergic Modulation of Visual Gamma and Alpha Oscillations and Its Consequences for Working Memory Performance  Diego Lozano-Soldevilla, Niels ter Huurne,
A Sparse Object Coding Scheme in Area V4
Hiroaki Norimoto, Yuji Ikegaya  Current Biology 
Floris van Breugel, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Joshua P. Bassett, Thomas J. Wills, Francesca Cacucci  Current Biology 
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Thomas Andrillon, Sid Kouider, Trevor Agus, Daniel Pressnitzer 
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Andres Laan, Tamar Gutnick, Michael J. Kuba, Gilles Laurent 
Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Lior Cohen, Gideon Rothschild, Adi Mizrahi  Neuron 
Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages (July 2015)
Cristina Márquez, Scott M. Rennie, Diana F. Costa, Marta A. Moita 
Kensaku Nomoto, Susana Q. Lima  Current Biology 
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Gal Aharon, Meshi Sadot, Yossi Yovel  Current Biology 
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
Evolution of a Behavioral Shift Mediated by Superficial Neuromasts Helps Cavefish Find Food in Darkness  Masato Yoshizawa, Špela Gorički, Daphne Soares,
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Single-Unit Responses Selective for Whole Faces in the Human Amygdala
Jennifer L. Hoy, Iryna Yavorska, Michael Wehr, Cristopher M. Niell 
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Vision Guides Selection of Freeze or Flight Defense Strategies in Mice
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Sharon C. Furtak, Omar J. Ahmed, Rebecca D. Burwell  Neuron 
Feng Han, Natalia Caporale, Yang Dan  Neuron 
Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations  Timothy J.
Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Optic flow induces spatial filtering in fruit flies
Direct Two-Dimensional Access to the Spatial Location of Covert Attention in Macaque Prefrontal Cortex  Elaine Astrand, Claire Wardak, Pierre Baraduc,
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Stephen V. David, Benjamin Y. Hayden, James A. Mazer, Jack L. Gallant 
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Visual Scene Perception in Navigating Wood Ants
Synchronized Activity between the Ventral Hippocampus and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Anxiety  Avishek Adhikari, Mihir A. Topiwala, Joshua A.
Traces of Experience in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Tuning to Natural Stimulus Dynamics in Primary Auditory Cortex
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
Ian C. Fiebelkorn, Yuri B. Saalmann, Sabine Kastner  Current Biology 
Rapid Spatial Learning Controls Instinctive Defensive Behavior in Mice
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
A Visual Sense of Number
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Regulation of Hippocampal Firing by Network Oscillations during Sleep
Presentation transcript:

Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets Floris van Breugel, Jeff Riffell, Adrienne Fairhall, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages 2123-2129 (August 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.046 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2015 25, 2123-2129DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.046) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Wind Tunnel, CO2 Plume, and Example Flight Trajectories (A) Wind tunnel used in our experiments. Color borders indicate top, side, and upwind views used in subsequent panels. (B) Heatmap of a turbulent-flow, particle-diffusion model of the CO2 plume based on 65 measurements in the wind tunnel; see the Experimental Procedures and Figure S1 for details. The white dot indicates a mosquito, drawn to scale. (C) Example flight trajectory in clean air. The two colored arrowheads show synchronized points across side and top views. The spacing between the points (33-Hz intervals) indicates the animal’s speed. (D) Example flight trajectory in the presence of a CO2 plume, showing the mosquitoes’ stereotypical behavior exploring the high-contrast object after sensing CO2. In both (C) and (D), an estimate of the animal’s instantaneous CO2 (or control) experience is plotted below and color-coded within the trajectories using the scale in (B). See also Figure S1 for additional trajectories and Movie S1 for animations. Current Biology 2015 25, 2123-2129DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.046) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 CO2 Triggers Mosquitoes to Explore High-Contrast Dark Objects (A) Heatmap showing where female mosquitoes spent their time over a 3-hr period. The top panel shows a side view of the data. The bottom panel shows a top down view of the data over the altitude range indicated by the vertical pink line in the top panel. The right panel shows a photograph of the wind tunnel. (B) Same as (A), but in the presence of a CO2 plume. (C) Same as (A), but in the presence of a CO2 plume and with a black and a white visual object on the floor of the tunnel. (D) Same as (A), but with male mosquitoes in clean air. We did not find any qualitative differences in male mosquitoes’ behavior in the presence of a CO2 plume (not shown). (E) Relative flight activity, measured as the ratio of time mosquitoes spent flying in the presence of a CO2 or clean air plume compared to their prior activity. (F) The ratio of the total time mosquitoes spent near the object divided by the total time they spent elsewhere for CO2 and clean air conditions. Shading shows bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals of the mean. (G) Time elapsed between when mosquitoes left the plume (conservatively defined here as 401 ppm) and when they approached to within 3 cm of the object. (H) Example trajectories (top row, side view; bottom row, top-down view) that contributed to the histogram shown in (G), demonstrating the circuitous path many mosquitoes took from the plume to the object. Only the trajectory segments between plume exit (pink arrow) and object approach are shown. See also Figure S2 for a description of plume-tracking behavior and Figure S3. Current Biology 2015 25, 2123-2129DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.046) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Visual Stimuli Provide an Intermediate Cue, Linking Long-Range Olfactory Cues and Short-Range Heat Sensing (A) Photograph of the ITO-coated glass pad. (B) Measurements of the thermal plume created by the heated glass pads at altitudes of 0.5, 2.5, and 6.5 cm, colored orange, purple, and black, respectively. (C) Photographs and thermal images of the stimuli in the wind tunnel. (D) Mean fraction of trajectories that entered an 8 × 8 × 4 cm3 volume above and downwind of either the left or right object (see F). Shading indicates 95% confidence intervals. The letters at the top indicate significantly different groups (Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction, p = 0.01). (E) Mean preference index for the test object versus control object with 95% confidence intervals. Statistics were calculated as in (D). (F) Sample trajectory entering one of the test volumes (green) used in (D) and (E). The trajectory is color-coded red for the 2 s prior to when it entered the volume. (G) Spatial representation of preference index prior to when mosquitoes entered either test volume shown in (F). For each trajectory, we selected the segments 2 s prior to when they entered either volume, in addition to the portions spent inside the volumes (red region of the trajectory shown in F). We then calculated the preference index for each 2 × 2 cm2 rectangular region as the amount of time spent on the side of the wind tunnel of the test object compared to the control object, divided by their sum. We then calculated the mean preference index for each 2 × 2 cm2 region across all trajectories and its 95% confidence interval. Colors indicate preference index for regions where the 95% confidence interval was smaller than 0.5 (out of the total range of −1 to +1); the regions with higher uncertainty are shown in black. Blue or pink colors that are more saturated than the arrows on the scale bar represent regions where the mosquitoes showed a statistically significant preference for one side or the other. The average approach trajectory for all the mosquitoes in each trial is shown as a magenta line. Because the average approach trajectories to the two objects were indistinguishable, this line shows the average approach of all trajectories for simplicity. The light-green box shows a side view of the volumes shown in (F). The colored arrows indicate the altitudes at which the temperature of the air was measured in (B). The number of trajectories that approached the test (orange), control (blue), or both (black) objects is indicated in the top right of each panel. Current Biology 2015 25, 2123-2129DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.046) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Thermal Signature of a Human Arm Temperature downwind (0.4 m/s) of a human arm measured at two different ambient temperatures (orange and purple). Horizontal lines indicate the ambient temperatures. Current Biology 2015 25, 2123-2129DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.046) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions