Automatic data processing of reference DNA-profiles from FTA and non-FTA samples  O. Hansson, L. Albinsson  Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The most efficient STR loci in forensic genetics in population of central Poland R. Jacewicz, M. Jedrzejczyk, J. Berent Forensic Science International:
Advertisements

DNA persistence in soft tissue comparing vodka and absolute ethanol
The end of bad hair days  Oliva Handt, Adrian Linacre 
Optimising direct PCR from anagen hair samples
Exploring the relative DNA contribution of first and second object’s users on mock touch DNA mixtures  F. Oldoni, V. Castella, D. Hall  Forensic Science.
Validation of sampletype I-sep DL for differential extraction and purification with prepfiler express in the automate express DNA extraction system  V.
V. Kallupurackal, T. Kausel, A. Sulzer, P. Voegeli, A. Kratzer 
R. Alghafri, W. Goodwin, S. Hadi 
Carolyn R. Steffen, Margaret C. Kline, David L. Duewer, Peter M
N. Cerri, S. Cisana, V. Cortellini, A. Verzeletti, A. Agostino, F
An evaluation of miniSTR markers for casework applications
Comparing the growth and effectiveness of forensic DNA databases
A. Barbaro, P. Cormaci, G. Falcone 
Pedro A. Barrio, Pablo Martin, Antonio Alonso 
Development and validation of the new Investigator® Argus X-12 QS Kit
Successful STR and SNP typing of FTA Card samples with low amounts of DNA after DNA extraction using a Qiagen BioRobot® EZ1 Workstation  Eszter Rockenbauer,
Evaluation of the urinary bladder swabs as a source of DNA for human identification using two different extraction methods  Brito FCA , Prata DRBM , Martha.
Multiplex PCR in non-human DNA molecular identification of Ascaris spp
Forensic identification of 12 mammals species based on size variation of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene using multiplex PCR assay  M. Črček, K. Drobnič 
Probabilistic modelling for DNA mixture analysis
C. Davies, J. Thomson, F. Kennedy 
DNA transfer by different parts of a hand
Establishment of Italian national DNA database and the central laboratory: Some aspects  R. Biondo, F. De Stefano  Forensic Science International: Genetics.
Sabine Michel, Anne De Bast, Isabelle Vandenbroere, Olivier Froment 
Timothy J. Verdon, R. John Mitchell, Roland A.H. van Oorschot 
Repeated extraction of DNA from FTA cards
Plant dna barcoding system for forensic application
Quantification of trace amounts of human and non-human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) using SYBR Green and real time PCR  Shanan S. Tobe, Adrian Linacre  Forensic.
Christina Valgren, Sara Wester, Oskar Hansson 
Direct amplification of STRs from blood or buccal cell samples
Rapid STR analysis of single source DNA samples in 2h
Automated extraction of DNA from clothing
Rob Ogden, Elizabeth Heap, Ross McEwing 
J. Hedman, L. Albinsson, L. Norén, R. Ansell 
A dedicated automated system for extraction, quantification and STR amplification of forensic evidence samples  James Stray, Vivian T. Nguyen, Jacquelyn.
False homozygosity at D12S391 locus: A case report
A. Trindade-Filho, C. Mendes, S. Ferreira, S. Oliveira, A
Thitika Kitpipit, Phuvadol Thanakiatkrai, Wilaiwan Chotigeat 
Automated addition of Chelex solution to tubes containing trace items
Denilce R. Sumita, Martin R. Whittle 
M. Omedei, C. Martino, S. Gino 
Quadruplex real-time PCR for forensic DNA quantitation
Ronny Decorte, Chi Fung Liu, Nancy Vanderheyden, Jean-Jacques Cassiman 
A review of low template STR analysis in casework using the DNA SenCE post-PCR purification technique  T. Gross, J. Thomson, S. Kutranov  Forensic Science.
Population data of 8 X-STRs in South Italy (Calabria) using the Mentype® Argus X-8 PCR Amplification Kit (Biotype)  A. Barbaro, P. Cormaci, S. Votano,
Doing more with less: Implementing direct amplification with the PowerPlex® 18D System  Rita Weispfenning, Kathryn Oostdik, Martin Ensenberger, Benjamin.
Improving sample analysis and interpretation using QIAGEN’s latest Investigator® STR multiplex PCR assays with a novel quality sensor  M. Scherer, M.
mRNA profiling for body fluid identification
N. Scaramozzino, P. Terrenoire, L. Baron 
Testing the behavior of GlobalFiler® PCR amplification kit with degraded and/or inhibited biological samples  V. Bogas, M. Carvalho, F. Corte-Real, M.J.
Development of the Investigator STR GO
Addie N. Olsen, Lynge C. Christiansen, Steffen J
Is an increased drop-in rate appropriate with enhanced DNA profiling?
Application of less primer method to commercial kits
Optimisation of DNA recovery and analysis of urine samples stored on FTA® card  Korapin Srisiri, Rakpana Jaroenwattana, Nathinee Panvisavas, Achirapa Bandhaya 
Linda Albinsson, Johannes Hedman, Ricky Ansell 
DNA persistence in soft tissue comparing vodka and absolute ethanol
DNA recovery from a 44-year old umbilical cord
Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using Tippett plots
STR-profiling for the differentiation between related and unrelated individuals in cases of citizen rights  Rolf Fimmers, Max Baur, Ute Rabold, Erhard.
Effects of the most common methods for the enhancement of latent fingerprints on DNA extraction from forensic samples  S. Gino, M. Omedei  Forensic Science.
M. Lurdes Pontes, M. Fátima Pinheiro 
Evaluation of the Differex™ System
Purification and concentration of PCR products leads to increased signal intensities with fewer allelic drop-outs and artifacts  L.M.I. Pedersen, M. Stangegaard,
A multiplexed system for quantification of human DNA and human male DNA and detection of PCR inhibitors in biological samples  M. Barbisin, R. Fang, C.E.
Development of a 24-plex Y chromosomal STR loci typing system
First application of the Investigator DIPplex indels typing kit for the analysis of ancient DNA samples  C. Hollard, F. Mendisco, C. Keyser, E. Crubézy,
Trace DNA success rates relating to volume crime offences
Proteinase K challenged by a novel protease
A.M. Ölçen, G. Filoğlu, H. Altunçul, S. Erdem, Ö. Bülbül 
Presentation transcript:

Automatic data processing of reference DNA-profiles from FTA and non-FTA samples  O. Hansson, L. Albinsson  Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series  Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 29-31 (August 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.143 Copyright © 2008 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 The laboratory flow of reference samples. The red arrows symbolise the flow if results could not be confirmed. The analysis of FTA cards starts with punching them twice to obtain duplicates. If the two profiles cannot be confirmed, a second pair is punched. PCR is carried out directly on the punches. Chelex extraction is performed on the card if the results still do not meet the criteria for creating confirmed results. When needed a purification is also made. The extraction or the purification is followed by quantification before PCR. Non-FTA analyses (mostly blood and muscle) are always quantified before amplification. Blood is extracted with Chelex and when needed also purified. Organic extraction is performed on muscles where a purification is obligatory. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2008 1, 29-31DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.143) Copyright © 2008 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 The classification system. The expert system assigns a class to each profile depending on its characteristics. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2008 1, 29-31DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.143) Copyright © 2008 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 The rule system. The expert system assigns result status and result type to each profile according to fixed rules and codes received from GeneMapper™ID. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2008 1, 29-31DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.143) Copyright © 2008 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 The data flow and handling inside and outside the LIMS system. All reference samples are analysed as duplicates. The data produced in Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic analyzer is first processed in GeneMapper™ID. The investigator is able to override the requirements for confirming results if there is a risk of the LIMS wrongly interpreting bad or corrupted profiles. Data tables are exported from GeneMapper™ID to the expert system. Duplicates are confirmed and profiles are sent to CODIS if they meet the set requirements. The profiles are further investigated in the LIMS system if confirmed results not are created. A new analysis is requested if confirmed results cannot be formed manually. The analysis of the sample is terminated if the analysis fails after several attempts. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2008 1, 29-31DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.143) Copyright © 2008 Terms and Conditions