Crystallization and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Characterization of the Complex of Photosystem I with its Natural Electron Acceptor Ferredoxin  Petra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Methods in Molecular Inorganic Chemistry, First Edition. David W. H. Rankin, Norbert W. Mitzel and Carole A John Wiley & Sons,
Advertisements

Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Michiko Tashiro, Hana Inoue, Masato Konishi  Biophysical Journal 
Ewa K. Krasnowska, Enrico Gratton, Tiziana Parasassi 
Detecting Protein Complexes in Living Cells from Laser Scanning Confocal Image Sequences by the Cross Correlation Raster Image Spectroscopy Method  Michelle.
Anisotropy Induced by Macroscopic Boundaries: Surface-Normal Mapping using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging  Evren Özarslan, Uri Nevo, Peter J. Basser  Biophysical.
Crystallization and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Characterization of the Complex of Photosystem I with its Natural Electron Acceptor Ferredoxin  Petra.
Sheila G. Couto, M. Cristina Nonato, Antonio J. Costa-Filho 
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Time-Resolved FTIR Difference Spectroscopy in Combination with Specific Isotope Labeling for the Study of A1, the Secondary Electron Acceptor in Photosystem.
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Michael J. Knight, Serena Dillon, Lina Jarutyte, Risto A. Kauppinen 
Verena Hoerr, Armin Purea, Cornelius Faber  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
D. Groen, G.S. Gooris, J.A. Bouwstra  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
PsaC Subunit of Photosystem I Is Oriented with Iron-Sulfur Cluster FB as the Immediate Electron Donor to Ferredoxin and Flavodoxin  Ilya R. Vassiliev,
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Enlargement and Contracture of C2-Ceramide Channels
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 98, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Singular Behavior of Slow Dynamics of Single Excitable Cells
Shiori Toba, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Shinji Kamimura, Kazuhiro Oiwa 
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (September 2017)
Probing Red Blood Cell Morphology Using High-Frequency Photoacoustics
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Low-Resolution Structures of Proteins in Solution Retrieved from X-Ray Scattering with a Genetic Algorithm  P. Chacón, F. Morán, J.F. Díaz, E. Pantos,
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Carlos A. Obejero-Paz, Stephen W. Jones, Antonio Scarpa 
Katie C. Bittner, Dorothy A. Hanck  Biophysical Journal 
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Low-Temperature Electron Transfer from Cytochrome to the Special Pair in Rhodopseudomonas viridis: Role of the L162 Residue  José M. Ortega, Barbara Dohse,
Dmitrii V. Vavilin, Esa Tyystjärvi, Eva-Mari Aro  Biophysical Journal 
Pressure Dependence of the Photocycle Kinetics of Bacteriorhodopsin
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Aligning Paramecium caudatum with Static Magnetic Fields
Birth and Growth Kinetics of Brome Mosaïc Virus Microcrystals
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Scott M. Blackman, Eric J. Hustedt, Charles E. Cobb, Albert H. Beth 
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
R.P. Schuhmeier, B. Dietze, D. Ursu, F. Lehmann-Horn, W. Melzer 
Phase Equilibria in DOPC/DPPC-d62/Cholesterol Mixtures
Jun’ichi Wakayama, Takumi Tamura, Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto 
Calcium-Induced Alterations in Mitochondrial Morphology Quantified in Situ with Optical Scatter Imaging  Nada N. Boustany, Rebekah Drezek, Nitish V. Thakor 
Alexander Spaar, Christian Münster, Tim Salditt  Biophysical Journal 
Membrane Perturbation Induced by Interfacially Adsorbed Peptides
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Enlargement and Contracture of C2-Ceramide Channels
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Evidence of Cholesterol Accumulated in High Curvature Regions: Implication to the Curvature Elastic Energy for Lipid Mixtures  Wangchen Wang, Lin Yang,
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Presentation transcript:

Crystallization and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Characterization of the Complex of Photosystem I with its Natural Electron Acceptor Ferredoxin  Petra Fromme, Hervé Bottin, Norbert Krauss, Pierre Sétif  Biophysical Journal  Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 1760-1773 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8 Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Scheme of the crystal holder used for changing the orientation of the cocrystals in two orthogonal directions. The θ1 angle was changed with a goniometer by steps of 5° and the ϕ1 angle was adjusted manually, with a precision of ∼5°, under a binocular microscope (20× magnification) while the crystal holder was maintained above a bath of liquid nitrogen. The holder was made of Plexiglas and its upper part was adapted to a standard quartz EPR tube. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cocrystals of photosystem I with ferredoxin and diffraction pattern. (A) Picture of the PSI/ferredoxin cocrystals. The crystals were grown by vapor diffusion: protein-solution (3μl): 100μM PSI (P700), 125μM ferredoxin, 22mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50mM CaCl2, 0.013% β-dodecylmaltoside, 4.7% PEG 400; reservoir (900μl): 0.1M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.15M CaCl2, 0.013% β-dodecylmaltoside, 14% PEG 400. The crystals shown herein have a size of 0.3mm. (B) Diffraction pattern of photosystem I/cocrystals obtained at beamline ID14–1 at ESRF in Grenoble; wavelength 1Å. The resolution is indicated by the circles. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Powder-type EPR spectra of cocrystals obtained from samples containing a large number (>50) of small cocrystals. Spectra A and B were obtained with a sample prepared in the crystallization medium at pH 9.2, with 15mM sodium dithionite and 200μM methyl viologen. The sample was incubated at room temperature for 5min in the presence of argon and was frozen under dim room light. The dotted vertical lines in spectrum B correspond to g=1.885, 1.955, and 2.05, respectively. These resonances were ascribed to reduced ferredoxin. Spectrum C was obtained from another sample prepared under conditions similar as above except pH=8.3. After freezing, the sample was illuminated at 240K for 2h with white light from a 800W tungsten-halogen lamp. The vertical arrows (g ≈ 1.765 and 2.09) were ascribed to FX−. For spectra A–C the large radical signals around the g=2 region were erased for easier data display. The inset shows the spectrum recorded on the same sample under and after illumination at low field (between 300 and 315 mT). EPR conditions (temperature, microwave power, and modulation amplitude at 100kHz, respectively): spectrum A, 8K, 80 mW, 1 mT; spectrum B, 45K, 20 mW, 1 mT; spectrum C, 9K, 80 mW, 1 mT; inset: 4.2K, 0.2 mW, 2.1 mT. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Light-induced spectra recorded at 10K for a single cocrystal at three mutually perpendicular orientations. Spectra A–C were recorded for (ϕ1, θ1)=(0°, 40°), (0°, 130°), and (90°, 5°), respectively. The P700+ signal is shown as a dotted line around g=2.00 in spectrum A and was subtracted from all three spectra. The nine FA− resonances that were used for characterizing its g-tensor are indicated as dotted vertical lines and their numerical values are given in Table 1. Integration of spectrum B gave spectrum /B. The right part of this spectrum was used for fitting with two Gaussian lines (not shown). EPR conditions: temperature, 10K; microwave power, 20 mW; modulation amplitude at 100kHz, 1 mT. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Angular parameters used for characterizing the orientation of the C3 trimer axis in the (A, B, C) framework (parts A and B) and in the (gx, gy, gz) framework (part C). (A, B, C) is an arbitrary permutation of (a, b, c), with a, b, and c being the three mutually perpendicular unit cell axes. (B) (u, v, C3) is an orthonormal framework. The u and x axes lie in the (A, B) plane. The C, C3, v, and x axes lie in the same vertical plane. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Light-induced spectra recorded at 10K. This series of spectra was recorded with the same cocrystal used for Fig. 4. The angles are ϕ1=0 and θ1=0 to 180° by steps of 5°. The spectra A and C (arrows) correspond to those exhibited in Fig. 4. The continuous lines are simulated g-values assuming that the B axis lies perfectly vertical during the whole series, which results in six different resonances at any orientation. The dotted lines were simulated by taking into account that the B axis is not perfectly vertical, which results in some splitting of all six lines (see text). Same EPR conditions as in Fig. 4. Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Light-induced spectra recorded at 20K and 5 mW of microwave power for the same cocrystal and the same mutually perpendicular orientations as those used in Fig. 4. The resonances at gA=1.909, gB=1.885, and gC=2.048 (arrows) were ascribed to FB−. These three g-values were used for characterizing the FB−g-tensor together with a few resonances ascribed as well to FB− and shown in Fig. 8 (g=2.067 at (ϕ1, θ1)=(0, 110°) and (0, 150°); g=2.063 at (ϕ1, θ1)=(0, 85°) and (0, 175°); g=2.061 at (ϕ1, θ1)=(0, 75°) and (0, 185°). This was performed by a systematic parameter search for minimizing the sum of the deviations between the above-observed six resonances (at 1.909, 1.885, and 2.048 for sets A, B, and C, respectively; at 2.067, 2.063, and 2.061 for (ϕ1, θ1)=(0, 110°), (0, 85°), and (0, 75°), respectively) with the calculated ones. For this minimization, we use the orientation of the C3 axis that we determined from the study of FA−. The following parameters were varied: gx=1.88±0.05; gy=1.93±0.05; gz=2.07±0.05; all possibilities for the angles defining the orientations of the FB−g-tensor in the (A, B, C) framework. The minimization output was used for deriving the properties of the FB−g-tensor (see text and Table 2) and the three FB− resonances that are expected for each of the three orientations with A, B, or C parallel to the magnetic field. These calculated resonances are shown as thin vertical lines in Fig. 7 (set A, g=1.9085, 1.911, 2.009; set B, g=1.885, 1.915, 2.018; set C, g=1.951, 1.985, 2.054). Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Light-induced spectra recorded at 20K and 5 mW of microwave power. This series of spectra was recorded with the same cocrystal used for Figs. 4 and 6 and at similar orientations as those used in Fig. 6. The angles are ϕ1=0 and θ1=70–190° by steps of 5°. The continuous lines are simulated g-values assuming the properties of the FB−g-tensor (Table 2), which were calculated in the present report from the best-fitting procedure described in the legend to Fig. 7. The same six observed resonances as those described in Fig. 7 were best-fitted assuming the orientation of the FB−g-tensor that is reported in Kamlowski et al. (1997) (bottom line in Table 2) and by taking the principal FB−g-values as free parameters (gx=1.88±0.05; gy=1.91±0.05, and gz=2.05±0.05). The best fit was obtained for gx=1.878, gy=1.932, and gz=2.064 and the dotted lines are simulated g-values assuming these principal g-values together with the orientation reported in Kamlowski et al. (1997). Biophysical Journal 2002 83, 1760-1773DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73942-8) Copyright © 2002 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions