DL MU-MIMO MAC efficiency issue

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /1275r0 Submission Laurent Cariou Nov, 2010 Slide 1 Complexity reduction for time domain H matrix feedback Authors: Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission November 2009 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Interference Cancellation for Downlink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1131r0 Sept K. Ishihara et al.,(NTT) Slide 1 Sept Slide 1 Time-Domain CSI Compression.
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Discussion on MU-MIMO based on Hybrid Beamforming System in ay
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0806r0 K. Ishihara et al.,(NTT) Slide 1 July 2010 Slide 1 CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO in TGac
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Polling for MU Measurements
Implicit Sounding for HE WLAN
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Regarding HE NDPA frame for DL Sounding Sequence
Heterogenous per-Client Doppler in MU-MIMO Scenarios
Regarding HE fragmentation
MU-MIMO STA scheduling strategy and Related PHY signaling
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Time Domain CSI report for explicit feedback
Initial Distributed MU-MIMO Simulations
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Discussion on EHT timeline and scope
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
Discussion on EHT timeline and scope
Time Domain CSI report for explicit feedback
UL MU Random Access Analysis
CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
Proposed solution for comments on Beam modes
Regarding HE fragmentation
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack
Multiplexing of Acknowledgements for Multicast Transmission
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
MAC Efficiency Gain of Uplink Multi-user Transmission
MIMO phase in MU-MIMO Beamforming
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
Box 5 results for Single BSS Calibration Case
Comparison of Coordinated BF and Nulling with JT
Considerations on feedback overhead
Measurements for Distributed-MU-MIMO
Implicit Channel Sounding in IEEE (Feasibility Study)
Multi-AP backhaul analysis
Presentation transcript:

DL MU-MIMO MAC efficiency issue Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 DL MU-MIMO MAC efficiency issue Date: 2010-05-18 Authors: John Doe, Some Company

Abstract MU-MIMO technology essentiality for TGac is no longer to demonstrate We need to make sure that this technology is efficient and performant. MU-MIMO process can be divided into two phases The feedback phase and the transmission phase Previous works have shown that the feedback phase should be made approximately every 20 to 25ms (coherence time of 800ms) [1] In this presentation we want to point out that such a low feedback period can strongly reduce the MAC efficiency of MU-MIMO, and reduce its usage. To efficiently solve this problem, Using only explicit feedback, compression of the CSI report needs to be supported If we use explicit and implicit feedbacks, we could also update the feedbacks during transmission phase Slide 2

MU-MIMO feedback phase duration MU-MIMO process can be divided into two phases, the feedback phase and the transmission phase If we assume explicit CSI feedback, the time duration of the feedback phase can be quite important For the feedback phase of a group of 4 users with 2 antennas each and an AP with 8 antennas with 6 bits quantization MCS2 applied on UL CSI reports: Feedback phase time duration 40MHz 80MHz 160MHz Size of CSI report 4x2,7 kB 4x5,4 kB 4x10,9 kB 12Mbps / MCS2 2,8 ms 5,1 ms 9,6 ms Slide 3

MU-MIMO feedback phase duration Example for 80MHz, with a feedback phase (overhead) of 5,1 ms (MCS2 for CSI report) every 25ms Feedback TXoP Data TxOP 25 ms Overhead Data 4 users 1 MU-MIMO group 8 users 2 MU-MIMO groups 12 users 3 MU-MIMO groups … 16 users 4 MU-MIMO groups time (ms) 0 5 10 15 20 25 Slide 4

Impact on MU-MIMO MAC efficiency The MAC efficiency of MU-MIMO is strongly affected by the increase of the number of users with 25 ms feedback period Calculations with explicit feedback, 80MHz, MCS2 for CSI reports, "8 antennas AP" and 4 "2antennas STA" TxOP of 3ms for transmission phase Slide 5

MU-MIMO MAC efficiency analysis The MAC efficiency is strongly affected by a low duration between feedbacks For high number of users (MU-MIMO full load) For higher bandwidth In highly loaded environnement This will reduce its usage: in our example, after 10 users, it seems not worth performing MU-MIMO We therefore need to improve MU-MIMO MAC efficiency The MAC efficiency gains provided by an increase of the feedback period are significant if the feedback period increase is significant Interference cancellation's benefits may not be sufficient With only explicit feedback, we need to provide strong compression mechanisms With explicit and implicit feedbacks, we can extend the feedback period by refreshing the CSI during the feedback phase Slide 6

One of the potential feedback architecture solution During the feedback phase, implicit feedback could be used, but it seems that explicit feedback is favored We therefore assumed that explicit feedback would be used during the feedback phase During the transmission phase, implicit feedback could then be performed using Sounding PPDU (staggered pilots) for BlockAck UL transmissions. The implicit feedback, which follows the time variation of the channel, would be used to update the CSI and re-compute the MU-MIMO beams This would increase the period of the explicit feedback phase Slide 7

One of the potential feedback architecture solution Calibration performed during the first TxOP of the transmission phase CSI updates and beam-recomputation performed on the following TxOPs Feedback phase Transmission phase

One of the potential feedback architecture solution Calibration performed during the feedback phase CSI updates and beam-recomputation performed on TxOPs in the transmission phase Feedback phase Transmission phase

Conclusion Analysing MAC efficiency for MU-MIMO with explicit feedbacks leads to strong inefficiencies with a feedback period of 25ms We believe that this problem needs to be solved, for the quality of user experience With explicit feedback as the only feedback mechanism, strong compression of CSI report is needed With explicit and implicit feedback mechanism, CSI updates during the transmission phase could extend the feedback period Slide 10

References [1] Ermani, S and Van Zelst, A, Interference cancellation for Downlink MU-MIMO, IEEE 802.11-10/1234r1, Mar. 2010 [2] Ishihara, K. and Yasushi, T., CSI Report for Explicit Feedback Beamforming in Downlink MU-MIMO, IEEE 802.11-10/0332r0, Mar. 2010 Slide 11