Retinal Injury, Growth Factors, and Cytokines Converge on β-Catenin and pStat3 Signaling to Stimulate Retina Regeneration  Jin Wan, Xiao-Feng Zhao, Anne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MicroRNA-9 Couples Brain Neurogenesis and Angiogenesis
Advertisements

Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2007)
Volume 182, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Caught in the Akt: Regulation of Wnt Signaling in the Intestine
Wnt/β-Catenin and Fgf Signaling Control Collective Cell Migration by Restricting Chemokine Receptor Expression  Andy Aman, Tatjana Piotrowski  Developmental.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
EGF Upregulates, Whereas TGF-β Downregulates, the Hyaluronan Synthases Has2 and Has3 in Organotypic Keratinocyte Cultures: Correlations with Epidermal.
Stimulation of hepatocarcinogenesis by neutrophils upon induction of oncogenic kras expression in transgenic zebrafish  Chuan Yan, Xiaojing Huo, Shu Wang,
Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Mediates EGFR Signaling to Regulate Keratinocyte Terminal Differentiation  Nan-Lin Wu, Duen-Yi Huang, Li-Fang Wang, Reiji Kannagi,
Direct Conversion of Mouse Fibroblasts into Neural Stem Cells by Chemical Cocktail Requires Stepwise Activation of Growth Factors and Nup210  Yuewen Tang,
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Activin-βA Signaling Is Required for Zebrafish Fin Regeneration
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (January 2018)
Roxanne Toivanen, Adithi Mohan, Michael M. Shen  Stem Cell Reports 
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Samuel A. LoCascio, Sylvain W. Lapan, Peter W. Reddien 
Lack of Collagen VI Promotes Wound-Induced Hair Growth
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Bo-Kuan Wu, Charles Brenner  Cell Reports 
Early Lineage Segregation between Epiblast and Primitive Endoderm in Mouse Blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK Pathway  Claire Chazaud, Yojiro Yamanaka,
Shane M. Harding, Jonathan A. Boiarsky, Roger A. Greenberg 
Jin Wan, Rajesh Ramachandran, Daniel Goldman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 7, Pages (September 2018)
Neurotransmitter-Regulated Regeneration in the Zebrafish Retina
Stat3 Controls Cell Movements during Zebrafish Gastrulation
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Wonho Kim, Yoon-Gu Jang, Jinsung Yang, Jongkyeong Chung 
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (September 2015)
Devendra S. Mistry, Yifang Chen, George L. Sen  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Suppresses Collagen Production and Proliferation in Keloid Fibroblasts via Inhibition of the STAT3-Signaling.
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
Activin Signals through SMAD2/3 to Increase Photoreceptor Precursor Yield during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation  Amy Q. Lu, Evgenya Y. Popova, Colin.
Specific Killing of Rb Mutant Cancer Cells by Inactivating TSC2
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages e6 (May 2019)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e5 (March 2019)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Shipra Das, Olga Anczuków, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2019)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Endogenous Control of Immunity against Infection: Tenascin-C Regulates TLR4- Mediated Inflammation via MicroRNA-155  Anna M. Piccinini, Kim S. Midwood 
Presentation transcript:

Retinal Injury, Growth Factors, and Cytokines Converge on β-Catenin and pStat3 Signaling to Stimulate Retina Regeneration  Jin Wan, Xiao-Feng Zhao, Anne Vojtek, Daniel Goldman  Cell Reports  Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 285-297 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048 Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2014 9, 285-297DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Insulin and HB-EGF Are Sufficient to Stimulate MG Proliferation in the Uninjured Retina (A and B) RT-PCR and qPCR analysis of injury-dependent ins gene expression. Error bars represent SD; ∗∗p < 0.01; n = 5. (C) In situ hybridization (purple) and BrdU immunofluorescence (red) shows injury-dependent ins gene induction in proliferating MG-derived progenitors at 4 dpi. Arrows point to BrdU+ cells expressing ins RNA. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (D) RT-PCR analysis of insra and insrb gene expression in FACS purified MG and non-MG. (E and F) qPCR analysis of insra (E) and insrb (F) gene expression in MG and non-MG. Error bars represent SD; n = 4. (G and H) MO-mediated Insra and Insrb knockdown suppresses the generation of MG-derived progenitors at 4 dpi. Scale bar (G) is 50 μm. Asterisk (G) marks the injury site. Error bars (H) represent SD; ∗p < 0.05; n = 3. (I and J) Insulin stimulates MG proliferation in the uninjured retina. Arrows (I) point to BrdU+ MG. Scale bar represents 150 μm. The three right-hand panels show BrdU+ progenitors express the MG marker glutamine synthetase (GS). Error bars (J) represent SD; n = 3. (K and L) HB-EGF and Insulin synergize with each other to stimulate MG proliferation in the uninjured retina. Arrows point to BrdU+ MG. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Error bars represent SD; n = 3. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2014 9, 285-297DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 IGF-1 and FGF2 Synergize with Each Other to Stimulate MG Proliferation in the Uninjured Retina (A) RT-PCR and qPCR analysis of injury-dependent induction of igf-1 mRNA. Error bars represent SD; ∗∗p < 0.001; n = 6. (B) In situ hybridization shows injury-dependent induction of igf-1 RNA in BrdU+ progenitors (arrows) at 4 dpi. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Asterisk marks the injury site. (C and D) RT-PCR (C) and qPCR (D) analysis of igf1ra, igf1rb and igfbp3 gene expression in FACS purified MG and non-MG at different times post retinal injury. Error bars (D) represent SD; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01; n = 4. (E) BrdU immunofluorescence shows effect of morpholino (MO)-mediated knockdown of Igfbp3, Igfra, or Igfbp on progenitor formation in the injured retina. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Asterisk marks the injury site. (F) Quantification of BrdU+ cells in (E). Error bars represent SD; ∗p < 0.05; n = 3. (G) BrdU immunofluorescence shows that conditional overexpression of dnFgfr1 in hsp70:dnfgfr1-egfp fish suppresses the generation of BrdU+ progenitors at 4 dpi. Asterisk marks the injury site. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (H) Quantification of BrdU+ cells in (G). Error bars represent SD; ∗p < 0.05 n = 3. (I) BrdU immunofluorescence shows IGF-1 and FGF2 synergize to stimulate MG proliferation in the uninjured retina. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Bottom three panels show that BrdU+ cells are also GS+ MG. (J) Quantification of BrdU+ cells in I. Error bars represent SD; n = 3. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2014 9, 285-297DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mapk/Erk, PI3K/Akt, β-Catenin, and Jak/Stat Signaling Regulate Injury and Growth Factor-Stimulated MG Proliferation (A and B) Mapk/Erk inhibitor (UO126) or PI3K inhibitors (Ly294002 or PI-103) reduce the number of BrdU+ progenitors at 4 dpi. Asterisks identify the injury site. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Error bars represent SD; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; n = 6. (C) TUNEL assay shows Mapk and PI3K inhibitors have no effect on cell death. (D) pErk and pAkt immunofluorescence in uninjured and injured (4 dpi) retinas. Asterisks identify the injury site. In the pErk panels, arrows point to pErk+ MG and arrowheads point to BrdU+ cells. In pAkt panels, arrowheads point to pAkt+ cells, while arrows point to BrdU+ cells. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (E) In the growth factor stimulated, but uninjured retina, BrdU+ progenitor formation is suppressed by inhibiting Mapk (UO126), PI3K (Ly294002), Jak/Stat (JSI-124) or β-catenin (pyrvinium) signaling. Error bars represent SD; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; n = 5. See also Figures S2–S4. Cell Reports 2014 9, 285-297DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Injury and Growth Factor-Dependent Activation of β-Catenin and Stat3 Signaling in MG-Derived Progenitors Requires Mapk/Erk and PI3K/Akt Signaling (A) Stat3-GFP and β-catenin immunofluorescence shows that inhibition of Mapk (UO126), PI3K (Ly294002), or the Egf receptor (PD153035) suppresses injury-dependent Stat3-GFP and β-catenin accumulation in gfap:stat3-gfp transgenic fish. Asterisks mark the injury site and arrows point to Stat3-GFP+ and β-catenin+ progenitors. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (B and C) Quantification of data shown in (A). Error bars represent SD; ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; n = 4. (D and E) Stat3-GFP and β-catenin immunofluorescence shows that intravitreally injected HB-EGF (50 ng) and Insulin (0.5 μg) (D) or FGF2 and IGF-1 (individually at 400 ng or together at 50 ng each) (E) act in a synergistic fashion to stimulate Stat3-GFP and β-catenin accumulation in the uninjured retina of gfap:stat3-gfp transgenic fish and their action is suppressed by inhibition of Mapk (UO126) or PI3K (Ly294002) signaling. Arrows point to Stat3-GFP+ and β-catenin+ progenitors. Scale bar represents 50 μm. Cell Reports 2014 9, 285-297DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 HB-EGF and IL-11 Synergize with Each Other to Stimulate MG Proliferation and Activation of the Stat3 and β-Catenin Signaling Components in the Uninjured Retina (A and B) HB-EGF and IL-11 synergize with each other to stimulate the generation of BrdU+ progenitors and the accumulation of Stat3 (A) and β-catenin (B) signaling components in the uninjured retina of gfap:stat3-gfp transgenic fish. Arrows point to double-labeled cells. Scale bar represents 50 μm. The green immunofluorescence signal in the photoreceptor layer is nonspecific, since it does not show up when using a secondary antibody coupled to a red Fluor (Figure S7). (C–E) Quantification of BrdU+ (C), Stat3-GFP+ (D), and β-catenin+ (E) progenitors in retinas intravitreally injected with HB-EGF, IL-11, or HB-EGF/IL-11. Error bars represent SD; n = 3. See also Figure S5. Cell Reports 2014 9, 285-297DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Crosstalk among HB-EGF, Insulin, IGF-1/FGF, and IL-11/Leptin Signaling Components Contributes to MG Proliferation in the Uninjured Retina (A) RT-PCR shows the effect of intravitreal injection of HB-EGF, Insulin, IGF-1/FGF2, or Leptin/IL-11 on each other’s expression and also the regeneration-associated factor, wnt8b. (B) BrdU immunofluorescence shows that MO-mediated knockdown of specific HB-EGF, Insulin, and IGF-1 signaling components suppress each other’s ability to stimulate MG proliferation in the uninjured retina. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (C–E) Quantification of data presented in (B). Error bars represent SD; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; n = 4. (F) Conditional overexpression of dnFgfr1 in hsp70:dnfgfr1-egfp fish inhibits FGF2/IGF-1-dependent MG proliferation, but not Insulin or HB-EGF-dependent MG proliferation, in the uninjured retina. Scale bar represents 150 μm. (G) Quantification of data presented in (F). Error bars represent SD. ∗∗∗p < 0.001; n = 3. See also Figure S6. Cell Reports 2014 9, 285-297DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.048) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions