Witness for Teleportation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Henry Haselgrove School of Physical Sciences University of Queensland
Advertisements

Optimizing pointer states for dynamical evolution of quantum correlations under decoherence Bo You,Li-xiang Cen Department of Physics, SiChuan University.
1 Separability and entanglement: what symmetries and geometry can say Helena Braga, Simone Souza and Salomon S. Mizrahi Departamento de Física, CCET, Universidade.
Quantum Computing MAS 725 Hartmut Klauck NTU
Spin chains and channels with memory Martin Plenio (a) & Shashank Virmani (a,b) quant-ph/ , to appear prl (a)Institute for Mathematical Sciences.
Fixing the lower limit of uncertainty in the presence of quantum memory Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata Collaborators:
Quantum Information Stephen M. Barnett University of Strathclyde The Wolfson Foundation.
Experimental quantum estimation using NMR Diogo de Oliveira Soares Pinto Instituto de Física de São Carlos Universidade de São Paulo
1 Multiphoton Entanglement Eli Megidish Quantum Optics Seminar,2010.
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Physics Department and Solid State Institute Entangled Photon Pairs from Semiconductor Quantum Dots Nikolay.
Dirac Notation and Spectral decomposition Michele Mosca.
Dirac Notation and Spectral decomposition
School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL & PHYSICAL SCIENCE Parallel Transport & Entanglement Mark Williamson 1, Vlatko Vedral 1 and William.
Quantum correlations. Adam W. Majewski. Quantum entanglement. Ghhjhjj Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon that occurs when particles (subsystems) are.
T he Separability Problem and its Variants in Quantum Entanglement Theory Nathaniel Johnston Institute for Quantum Computing University of Waterloo.
From finite projective geometry to quantum phase enciphering (Discrete Math of MUBs) H. Rosu, M. Planat, M. Saniga (IPICyT-Mx, LPMO-Fr, Astronomical Inst.-Sk)
Witnesses for quantum information resources Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata, India Collaborators: S. Adhikari,
Test for entanglement: realignment criterion, entanglement witness and positive maps Kai Chen † CQIQC, Toronto, July 2004 † Kai Chen is now a postdoctoral.
Jian-Wei Pan Decoherence-free sub-space and quantum error-rejection Jian-Wei Pan Lecture Note 7.
The Road to Quantum Computing: Boson Sampling Nate Kinsey ECE 695 Quantum Photonics Spring 2014.
Three different ways There are three different ways to show that ρ(A) is a simple eigenvalue of an irreducible nonnegative matrix A:
Quantum Teleportation and Bit Commitment Chi-Yee Cheung Chung Yuan Christian University June 9, 2009.
Information Processing by Single Particle Hybrid Entangled States Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences Kolkata, India Collaborators:
Quantum Dense coding and Quantum Teleportation
Bell Measurements and Teleportation. Overview Entanglement Bell states and Bell measurements Limitations on Bell measurements using linear devices Teleportation.
Analytical Approach to Optimal Discrimination with Unambiguous Measurements University of Tabriz M. Rezaei Karamaty Academic member of Tabriz University.
Black-box Tomography Valerio Scarani Centre for Quantum Technologies & Dept of Physics National University of Singapore.
1 / 18 DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, 60 ST. GEORGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5S 1A7 Quantum Correlations from Classical Coherence.
The Classically Enhanced Father Protocol
Efficiency of Multi-Qubit W states in Information Processing Atul Kumar IPQI-2014 IIT Jodhpur
Quantum Entanglement and Distillation in Information Processing Shao-Ming Fei
Marcos Curty 1,2 Coauthors: Tobias Moroder 2,3, and Norbert Lütkenhaus 2,3 1.Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control (CQIQC), University of.
A generalization of quantum Stein’s Lemma Fernando G.S.L. Brandão and Martin B. Plenio Tohoku University, 13/09/2008.
8.4.2 Quantum process tomography 8.5 Limitations of the quantum operations formalism 量子輪講 2003 年 10 月 16 日 担当:徳本 晋
Coherent Classical Communication Aram Harrow, MIT Quantum Computing Graduate Research Fellow Objective Objective ApproachStatus Determine.
Absolute Separability and the Possible Spectra of Entanglement Witnesses Nathaniel Johnston — joint work with S. Arunachalam and V. Russo Mount Allison.
1 Conference key-agreement and secret sharing through noisy GHZ states Kai Chen and Hoi-Kwong Lo Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Dept.
When are Correlations Quantum?: Verification and Quantification of Entanglement with simple measurements Imperial College London Martin B Plenio Koenraad.
Distillation and determination of unknown two-qubit entanglement: Construction of optimal witness operator Heung-Sun Sim Physics, KAIST ESF conference:
Debasis Sarkar * Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta *
Density matrix and its application. Density matrix An alternative of state-vector (ket) representation for a certain set of state-vectors appearing with.
QUANTUM OPTICS LAB IAP, UNIVERSITÄT BERN Qudit Implementations with Energy-Time Entangled Photons 1 Bänz Bessire Quantum Optics Lab – The Stefanov Group.
Quantum Coherence and Quantum Entanglement
3. Polygon Triangulation
Support vector machines
Fernando G.S.L. Brandão and Martin B. Plenio
Maximally Multipartite Entangled States and Statistical Mechanics
Twirling states to simplify separability
Jean Christian Boileau (University of Toronto)
Subadditivity of geometrical Bell inequalities for Qudits
M. Stobińska1, F. Töppel2, P. Sekatski3,
Quantum Information Promises new insights Anthony J
Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Topological Entanglement Entropy and Multipartite correlations Kohtaro Kato (The University of Tokyo) based on.
Unconstrained distillation capacities of
Jianping Fan Dept of CS UNC-Charlotte
1. Problem Formulation.
On MPS and PEPS… David Pérez-García. Near Chiemsee
Quantum entanglement measures and detection
Quantum State and Process Measurement and Characterization
Quantum Foundations Lecture 20

Lev Vaidman 23 August 2004, Cambridge Zion Mitrani Amir Kalev
Handout 4 : Electron-Positron Annihilation
Maths for Signals and Systems Linear Algebra in Engineering Lectures 13 – 14, Tuesday 8th November 2016 DR TANIA STATHAKI READER (ASSOCIATE PROFFESOR)
Spin Many quantum experiments are done with photon polarization instead of electron spin Here is the correspondence between the two And the measurement.
Support vector machines
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
Sequential sharing of nonlocal correlations
Finite Heisenberg group and its application in quantum computing
Computational approaches for quantum many-body systems
Presentation transcript:

Witness for Teleportation Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata Collaborators: S. Adhikari, N. Ganguly, J. Chatterjee arXiv: 1108.1493 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 270501 (2011) ]; 1101.0477

Entanglement Witnesses Quantum entanglement is a useful resource for performing many tasks not achievable using laws of classical physics, e.g., teleportation, superdense coding, cryptography, error correction, computation….. Q: How does one detect entanglement in the lab ? Given an unknown state, will it be useful for information processing ? Methodology: Construction of witness (hermitian) operators for entanglement; measurement of expectation value in the given unknown state tells us whether it is entangled or not. Measurability in terms of number of parameters vis-à-vis state tomography

PLAN Entanglement witnesses: status and motivations Witness for teleportation: proof of existence Proposal for teleportation witness operator: examples Construction of common and optimal witnesses Measurability of a witness and its utility

Entanglement Witnesses Existence of Hermitian operator with at least one negative eigenvalue [Horodecki , M. P. & R. 1996; Terhal 2000] As a consequence of Hahn-Banach theorem of functional analysis – provides a necessary and sufficient condition to detect entanglement Various methods for construction of entanglement witnesses [Adhikari & Ganguly PRA 2009; Guhne & Toth, Phys. Rep. 2009] Search for optimal witnesses [Lewenstein et al. 2000; Sperling & Vogel 2009]; Common witnesses for different classes of states [Wu & Guo, 2007]; Schmidt number witness [Terhal & Horodecki, 2000] Thermodynamic properties for macroscopic systems [Vedral et al., PRL 2009] Measurability with decomposition in terms of spin/polarization observables

Witness for teleportation Motivation: Teleportation is a prototypical information processing task; present challenge in pushing experimental frontiers, c.f. Zeilinger et al. Nature (1997), Jin et al., Nat. Phot. (2010). Utility: distributed quantum computation. Not all entangled states useful for teleportation, e.g., in 2 x 2, MEMS, and other classes of NMEMS not useful when entanglement less than a certain value [Adhikari, Majumdar, Roy, Ghosh, Nayak, QIC 2010]; problem is more compounded in higher dimensions. Q: How could we know if a given state is useful for teleportation ? Hint: For a known state, teleportation fidelity depends on its fully entangled fraction (FEF)

Witness of states useful for teleportation N. Ganguly, S. Adhikari, A. S. Majumdar, J. Chatterjee arXiv: 1108.1493 [quant-ph]; Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 270501 (2011) How to determine whether an unknown state is useful as a resource for teleportation ? Property of fully entangled fraction (FEF) of states is related to their ability for performing teleportation Threshold value of FEF enables us to prove existence of teleportation witness operators

[Bennett et al, 1996; Horodecki (M, P, R), 1999] Fully entangled fraction of a state State acts as teleportation channel fidelity exceeds (classical) 2/3 if FEF > 1/d [Bennett et al, 1996; Horodecki (M, P, R), 1999] (FEF interesting mathematical concept, but hard to calculate in practice) : computed example in higher dimensions, Zhao et al, J. Phys. A 2010)

Existence of teleportation witness Goal: To show that the set of all states with not useful for teleportation is separable from other states useful for teleportation Proposition: The set is convex and compact. Any point lying outside S can be separated from it by a hyperplane Makes possible for Hermitian operators with at least one negative eigenvalue to be able to distinguish states useful for teleportation

Separability of states using the Hahn-Banach theorem

Proof of the Proposition: In two steps: First, the set is convex Let thus, Now consider (U is compact) Hence, and or

Proof of the Proposition: Proof: (ii) S is compact for finite d Hilbert space, suffices to show S is closed and bounded. (every physical density matrix has a bounded spectrum: eigenvalues lying between 0 & 1; hence bounded) Closure shown using properties of norm .

Proof of S being closed For any two density matrices, let maximum of FEF be attained for and . Hence, Or, (Set of all unitary operators is compact, it is bounded: for any U, ) Similarly, (Hence, F is a continuous function). Now, for any density matrix , with ([maximally mixed , max. ent. pure] For S, Hence, is Closed. [QED]

Summary of proof of existence of teleportation witness The set is convex and compact. Any point lying outside S can be separated from it by a hyperplane The set of all states with not useful for teleportation is separable from other states useful for teleportation Makes possible for Hermitian operators with at least one negative eigenvalue to be able to distinguish states useful for teleportation

Separability of states using the Hahn-Banach theorem (S is convex and compact)

Construction of witness operator Properties of the witness operator: for all states which are not useful for teleportation, and for at least one state which is useful for teleportation. Proposed witness operator: Now, for a separable state

Application of Witness: examples (i) Werner State: All entangled Werner states are useful for teleportation (ii) MEMS (Munro, et al, 2001) Non-vanishing entanglement, but not useful for teleportation (confirms earlier results [Lee, Kim, 2000, Adhikari et al QIC 2010] in Utility for higher dimensions where FEF is hard to compute.

Witnesses are not universal

Finding common witnesses [N. Ganguly, S. Adhikari, PRA 2009; N Finding common witnesses [N. Ganguly, S. Adhikari, PRA 2009; N. Ganguly, S. Adhikari, A. S. Majumdar, arXiv: 1101.0477] Motivations: Witness not universal or optimal; fails for certain states, e.g., State useful for teleportation, but witness W is unable to detect it, as ffdfdfadaaaaf (similar to what happens in the case of entanglement witnesses) Goal: Given two classes of states, to find a common witness operator (studied here in the context of entanglement witnesses; to be extended for teleportation witnesses) Criterion for existence of common entanglement witnesses: For a pair of entangled states, common EW exists iff is an entangled state [Wu & Guo, PRA 2007]

Construction of common EW Consider two NPT states Consider two sets consisting of all eigenvectors corresponding to negative eigenvalues of Proposition: then there exists a common EW Proof: Similarly,

Example of a qutrit system Consider two states Thus, W is a common witness. Is entangled for all and can be detected by W. Above states are NPT. For PPTES, nondecomposable witness operator required for common EW. [Ganguli et al arXiv: 1101.0477]

Measurability of Witness operator Hermitian witness operator: decomposed in 2 x 2: requires measurement of 3 unknown parameters. (Far less than 15 required for full state tomography ! Difference even larger in higher dimensions) For implementation using polarized photons [c.f., Barbieri, et al, PRL 2003] (decomposition in terms of locally measurable form) W = ½(|HV><HV|+|VH><VH> - |DD><DD|- |FF><FF|+ |LL><LL> + |RR><RR>) In terms of horizontal, vertical, diagonal, and left & right circular polarization states.

Entanglement Witness: Summary & Conclusions [arXiv: 1108. 1493 ; Phys Entanglement Witness: Summary & Conclusions [arXiv: 1108.1493 ; Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 270501]; 1101.0477] Teleportation is an important information processing task Not all entangled states are useful for performing teleportation. Connected to property of the fully entangled fraction We propose and prove existence of hermitian witness operators for distinguishing unknown states useful for teleportation using a geometric consequence of Hahn-Banach theorem Towards optimality – methods for constructing common witnesses Examples of Witness operator -- its utility and measurability

Entanglement Witnesses: Future Directions arXiv: 1108. 1493 [Phys. Rev Entanglement Witnesses: Future Directions arXiv: 1108.1493 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 270501 (2011)]; 1101.0477 Common entanglement witnesses and optimality – witnesses for PPTES and edge states, common teleportation witness…. Witnesses for other information processing tasks, e.g., dense coding, secure key generation, etc. Macroscopic entanglement witnesses – robustness against dissipative effects.