Identification of port, terminal, berth and berth position

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development and Impact of Inland ENCs/ECDIS on Hydrographic Offices Denise LaDue, USACE.
Advertisements

IHB Report on IRCC-2HSSC-2. IRCC-2 Establish, coordinate and enhance cooperation in hydrographic activities amongst States on a regional basis, and between.
PPUs and Electronic Charts, Southampton 12 May 2011 bathymetric ENCs (S-57 based bathy layers) Friedhelm Moggert-Kägeler, SevenCs GmbH.
IHO Work Programme 2 – “Hydrographic Services and Standards”
Port Information Intertanko, London January 2007.
Electronic Navigational Charts (ENCs) Captain Jim Gardner Chief, Marine Chart Division Office of Coast Survey National Ocean Service.
1 ENC Encryption/ISO Julia Powell Office of Coast Survey Marine Chart Division.
C-MAP Norway AS One Stop Shop for Nautical Information FARGIS Seminar Oslo 16/17 March,2004.
International Hydrographic Organization Nautical Information Provision Working Group 1 st Meeting - Monaco 29 June -3 July 2015 Agenda item 22 Coordination.
International Hydrographic Organization MSDI OPEN FORUM IHO MSDIWG Vision and Deliverables to the IHO London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann.
UPPER HUMBER ENC TRIAL Nov 2012 – Oct 2013 Andy Hinton – Geographic Manager England East and South.
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee 7th MEETING OF THE IHO HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICES AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE (HSSC) Busan, Republic of Korea,
Hydrographic and cartographic products and services (including importance of updating) Commander Tim Sewell Head of International Partnering (Americas)
ECDIS.
UK National Report 17th Meso American and Caribbean Sea
S-100 Test Bed Platform S-100WG / KHOA Presented by KHOA (Yong BAEK)
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
Report of the ENC Standards Maintenance Working Group
Standards” and by the Council key Priorities
Future of the Paper Chart
Update on the ongoing efforts
Underkeel Clearance Management (UKCM) Systems in S-49 (Standardization Of Mariners’ Routeing Guides), M-3 (IHO Resolutions), and S-32 (IHO Hydrographic.
From Port Information Guide to Avanti
IRCC work is guided by the IHO Work Programme 3
REPORT AND PROPOSALS FROM IRCC Reference Doc: C2-4.2A
Brief on Nautical Information Provision Working Group work
Development and future provision of S-100 based Products
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
IHO S-121 Standard on Maritime Limits and Boundaries
International Centre for Electronic Navigational Charts
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Lecturers: OLGA LUCIA BONFANTE LOZADA PhD (c)
Updates and Proposals from the HSSC
Draft procedure for ENC overlaps (IRCC6-08b)
Updating S-49 (Mariners’ Routeing Guide)
NCWG Input to the IHO Strategic Plan and IHO 3 Year Work Plan
Meeting international obligations
Report of the / Proposal by the #### Title
MEMBER STATE AUDIT SCHEME
Report of the Nautical Cartography WG Mikko Hovi, Chair NCWG
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
HSSC11 – 5.1D S-100 Readiness Levels.
IHO Secretariat, Monaco, November
IRCC work is guided by the IHO Work Programme 3
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Standards” and by the Council key Priorities
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Status Report of the SPRWG of the Council Future Strategic Plan
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Report of the S-101 Project Team
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee Report of the ENCWG
IEC Activities affecting HSSC Hannu Peiponen Chair IEC TC80
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
Nautical Information Provision Working Group IHO Strategic Plan
Status Report of the SPRWG of the Council
WENDWG – WENSWG Progress Report
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
CIRM Presentation Raytheon Anschütz Distributor Meeting 2016
Roadmap for the S-100 Implementation Decade
Presentation transcript:

Identification of port, terminal, berth and berth position Why How Definitions Result Next steps forward

Why? If you don’t know to which berth you’re going, how can you make a berth to berth passage plan? Number one complaint today: terminal, berth and berth position not known to mariners

Why? Regulation 19, Chapter V 2018 last implementation phase for ECDIS Resolution A893-21 Berth to berth passage planning with increasing ship sizes Resolution A960 More disconnect between pilot and bridge team by use of ECS in PPU vs ENC in ECDIS Ambition 50% reduction CO2 in 2050 Just In Time arrivals as short term measure – more need for efficient passage planning

Why? The user expects ENC and digital products to be more accurate Updates from ports to Hydrographic Offices are still the same as for paper charts and products Need to provide frequent digital updates from ports

Why? Semi autonomous docking: today Autonomous docking: some day The Last Nautical Mile is very busy

How? For a migration to common, globally defined standards requires both investment in culture change Therefore, only robust, existing, global, cross industry standards have been selected, ensuring a sustainable investment decision

How Hierarchical relationship between geographic areas in a port area Direct ref: WGS84 Indirect ref: ISO 3166 Attribute: Name Terminal Indirect ref ISO/IEC 6523 Attribute: Name / GISIS / SMDG Berth Indirect ref: ISO/IEC 6523 Berth position Indirect ref: ISO/IEC 6523 + Extension Attribute: Name + Number of bollard / manifold/ramp Hierarchical relationship between geographic areas in a port area

How Example

How Example

Definitions To be improved: exact definition of berth, to obtain exact data

Definitions To be improved: exact definition of berth position, to obtain exact data

Result Only with exact berth and berth position data it is possible to make a safe port passage plan, and a vessel-berth compatibility check

Result Automated exact maximum draught calculations

Result Automated exact Just In Time sailing planning

Next steps forward Publication of standards December 2019

Next steps forward Step by step guide for ports

Action to be considered by HSSC / IHMA Noting the outcome of HSSC-8 (2016) “The HSSC Chair concluded the discussion stating that if a PS had to be developed, it should be done by the IHMA (or another appropriate body) as the IHO (or HOs) has a different remit and does not have the capacity to hold and maintain all the additional information required (that is not required for navigational charts). IHMA could have their own Domain in the Registry, administered by them” HSSC to take note of the progress made on the development of Port Guide Information technical specifications IHMA to consider the development of a Port Guide Information Product Specification under the S-100 framework, and to provide the management plan of governance mechanisms for ports database establishment, maintenance, etc. HSSC-11, Cape Town, South Africa, 6- 9 May 2019

Thank you