Lec 04: Introduction to GPS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
Advertisements

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) for Precision Farming
1 GPS processing. Sat05_82.ppt, Directly from the observations 2.From differences (especially if vectors between points are to be determined)
GPS – Global Positioning System Space segment Control segment user segment 32 satellites World wide monitor and control stations.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
Introduction.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
11/19/01UTexas Austin Seminar1 “Global” Global Positioning System Measurements Prof. Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences.
July 17, 2002Zambia GNSS Earth Science Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) for Earth Sciences Prof. Thomas Herring, Massachusetts Institute.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
1/28/2010PRRMEC What is GPS… The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a U.S. space- based global navigation satellite system. It provides reliable positioning,
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
Global Positioning System
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future GLONASS Russia’s global satellite navigation system 24 satellites in three.
By Andrew Y.T. Kudowor, Ph.D. Lecture Presented at San Jacinto College.
NAVSTAR GPS Mike Mickelson KD8DZ 08 Dec GPS BASICS.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
CRGIS Global Positioning Systems The Basics CRGIS National Park Service.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
Introduction To Localization Techniques (GPS)
Global Positioning System Overview
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 02 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future Precision Agriculture – Lesson 2 What is GPS? Global Positioning System Operated.
Chapter 2 GPS Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
05/12/1005/08/ Lec Lec Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 23 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
01/05/ IAP Class Field Geophysics Instructors Tom Herring, Brad Hager Web:
Revised 10/30/20061 Overview of GPS FORT 130 Forest Mapping Systems.
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 17
GPS Fundamentals Your location is: 37o ’ N 122o ’ W.
Global Positioning System
GPS: Global Positioning System
GPS - Global Positioning System
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) for Precision Farming
Global Positioning System Supplemental from JD Text
How Things Work: Global Positioning System
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Surveying Techniques II. GPS
Surveying Instruments
Off-Road Equipment Management TSM 262: Spring 2016
Field Geophysics Instructors Tom Herring, Brad Hager Web:
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11
Global Positioning System
Presentation transcript:

Lec 04: Introduction to GPS 12.221 Field Geophysics Instructors Brad Hager bhhager@mit.edu Tom Herring, tah@mit.edu Stephane Rondenay, rondenay@mit.edu Web: http://geoweb.mit.edu/~tah/12.221 Lec 04: Introduction to GPS

Introduction to GPS Uses of GPS in this course Hand held navigation. ($200) Differential “kinematic” positioning for determining heights of gravity measurements and seismic locations. Precise static positioning for ~1 mm positioning ($5-10K) 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Coordinate Systems See discussion in IEEE paper We will need to deal with several coordinate systems and methods of expressing coordinates. System: Origin at center of mass of Earth Z-axis along average position of rotation axis (moves by 10 m during a year – call polar motion) X-axis along Greenwich meridian (convention) Before space-based geodesy (mid-1970’s), realizations of this system could differ by several hundred meters. Impact of this for us will be difference between North American Datum 1927 (NAD 27) (most paper maps use this system) and NAD83/World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) (used by GPS but with options for other systems) 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Systems we need Modern GPS results are given in the “International Terrestrial Reference System”. Latest realization is ITRF2005 (Use Frame to denote realization) World Geodetic System WGS84 used by GPS control center (within a few meters of ITRF2005) However: Maps made well before this system and most US maps use North American Datum (NAD) 1927 (NAD27) or NAD83 (which is very close to WGS84 and ITRF2005. NAD27 is approximately 200 m away from modern system 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Types of coordinates Within a system, coordinates can be expressed in different ways: Cartesian (XYZ – Computational easy) Geocentric latitude, longitude and radius (spherical) Geodetic latitude, longitude and height above ellipsoid (ellipsoidal coordinate system). Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. Actually ellipsoidal map projection coordinates. These have units of distance compared to latitude and longitude which are angle measurements. Coordinates expressed as Northing and Easting. Digital Elevation Models (DEM) are often in UTM coordinates. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

GPS Original Design Started development in the late 1960s as NAVY/USAF project to replace Doppler positioning system Aim: Real-time positioning to < 10 meters, capable of being used on fast moving vehicles. Limit civilian (“non-authorized”) users to 100 meter positioning. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Design Characteristics of GPS Innovations: Use multiple satellites (originally 21, now ~30-32) All satellites transmit at same frequency Signals encoded with unique “bi-phase, quadrature code” generated by pseudo-random sequence (designated by PRN, PR number): Spread-spectrum transmission. Dual frequency band transmission: L1 ~1.575 GHz, L2 ~1.227 GHz Corresponding wavelengths are 190 mm and 244 mm Dual frequency band transmission allows the dispersive delay of the ionosphere to be removed (10-100 m) 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Block IIR Satellite Transmission array is made up of 12 helical antenna in two rings of 43.8 cm (8 antennas) and 16.2 cm (4 antennas) radii Total diameter is 87 cm Solar panels lead to large solar radiation pressure effects. Mass: 1,110 kg 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Measurements Time difference between signal transmission from satellite and its arrival at ground station (called “pseudo-range”, precise to 0.1–10 m) Carrier phase difference between transmitter and receiver (precise to a few millimeters) but initial values unknown (ie., measures change in range to satellites). In some case, the integer values of the initial phase ambiguities can be determined (bias fixing) All measurements relative to “clocks” in ground receiver and satellites (potentially poses problems). 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Measurement Usage “Spread-spectrum” transmission: Multiple satellites can be measured at same time. Since measurements can be made at same time, ground receiver clock error can be determined (along with position). Signal 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Measurement usage Since the C(t) code changes the sign of the signal, satellite can be only be detected if the code is known (PRN code) Multiple satellites can be separated by “correlating” with different codes (only the correct code will produce a signal) The time delay of the code is the pseudo-range measurement. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Position Determination (perfect clocks) • Three satellites are needed for 3-D position with perfect clocks. • Two satellites are OK if height is known) 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Position determination: with clock errors: 2-D case • Receiver clock is fast in this case, so all pseudo-ranges are short 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Positioning For pseudo-range to be used for positioning the following quantities must known: Errors in satellite clocks (use of Cesium or Rubidium clocks) Positions of satellites This information is transmitted by satellite in “broadcast ephemeris”. This information saved in receiver data file. We will use for in-field processing “Differential” positioning (DGPS) eliminates need for accurate satellite clock knowledge. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

GPS Security systems Selective availability (SA) is no longer active but prior to 2000 “denied” civilian accuracy better than 100 m Implemented by “dithering” (noising up) the satellite clock Military receivers were able to undo the dithering Antispoofing (AS) active since 1992, adds additional encryption to P-code on L1 and L2. Makes civilian GPS receivers more expensive and more sensitive to radio interference Impact of AS and SA is small on differential GPS results 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Effects of Selective Availability 1 nanosecond (ns) = 30 cm 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Relativistic Effects: Sensitivity of GPS 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Current constellation • Relative sizes correct (inertial space view) • “Fuzzy” lines not due to orbit perturbations, but due to satellites being in 6-planes at 55o inclination. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Types of parameters estimated in GPS analysis GPS phase measurements at L1 and L2 from a global distribution of station used. Pseudo-range can be used but 100 times less accurate than phase. Giobal Analysis typically includes: All site positions estimated Atmospheric delay parameters estimated “Real” bias parameters for each satellite global, integer values for regional site combinations (<500 km) Orbital parameters for all satellites estimated (1-day orbits, 2-revolutions) 6 Integration constants 3 constant radiation parameters 6 once-per-revolution radiation parameters Orbits need not be estimated when International GNSS Service (IGS) finals orbits are used (post-1996). 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

GPS Antennas (for precise positioning) Nearly all antennas are patch antennas (conducting patch mounted in insulating ceramic). • Rings are called choke-rings (used to suppress multi-path) 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Styles of Monuments 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Global IGS Network (~400 stations) 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Typical global network Black: Frame sites (define ITRF2000); Red other sites 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Example Results from GPS analyses Examples of time series for some sites Tectonic motions in the Asian region Motions in California (example in more detail later) Time series of motions for some sites Post seismic motion after 1999 Hector Mine earthquake 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Tectonic Deformation Results “Fixed GPS” stations operate continuously and by determining their positions each day we can monitor their motions relative to a global coordinate system Temporary GPS sites can be deployed on well defined marks in the Earth and the motions of these sites can be monitored (campaign GPS) Our field camp sites will be temporary and we will measure “relative” to continuous Southern California Plate Boundary Observatory sites. http://pboweb.unavco.org/ 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Example of motions measured in Pacific/Asia region • Fastest motions are >100 mm/yr • Note convergence near Japan More at http://www-gpsg.mit.edu/~tah/MIT_IGS_AAC 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Types of motions in Western US Episodic Tremor and Slip Parkfield Earthquake 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Hector Mine Co- and Post-seismic displacements Vectors show coseismic offsets and postseismic displacements after 7-years Postseimic estimated with two different methods. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Time series for site LDES 178 mm Coseismic offsets 57 mm 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Time series with coseismic offset removed Accumulated postseismic 28 mm 13 mm 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Time series 60-day averaging 31 mm postseismic 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Analysis of postseismic signals One method of analysis for signals is principle component analysis Number of components related to number of processes acting during postseismic period 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Large scale postseismic deformation Examine North component of motion (averaged 60-days) Figure from Andy Freed and Roland Burgmann 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Analysis for San Simeon Earthquake PBO stations installed after earthquake 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Time series of North motion of sites near San Simeon Grey lines show motion expected for this part of California 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Arrival of surface waves from San Simeon Earthquake (1-Hz) GPS stations around Parkfield operate at 1-Hz sampling rates, which allows us to study surface wave arrivals from nearby and large magnitude earthquakes Systematic behavior due to multipath and maybe atmospheric delays 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Time zoom of arrivals In addition to the surface waves, the static co-seismic offset can also be seen here. Real time high rate GPS data useful for surveying and engineering communities. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Parkfield Earthquake 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Full North/East Time series for Parkfield site Pre-Earthquake North 19.1±0.1 mm/yr East -15.2±0.3 mm/yr 2006-2007 Velocities North 10.5±0.3 mm/yr East -10.0±0.5 mm/yr Log coefficients here are 10 mm: Even a decade after earthquake, rate still be offset by 1 mm/yr. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

GPS Sites Around Field Camp 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

Regional view 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04

12.221 Uses of GPS In the course we will use different GPS analysis packages: Hand-held receivers: These have the software built in and you just need to select correct options. TRACK: Kinematic GPS processing in the field (time series of station positions) GAMIT: Full static GPS positioning (run on campus) GLOBK: Used to tie our GPS results into the rest of California. 01/09/08 12.221 IAP Lec 04