VDJ Recombination Cell Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Evolution 2 Recombination & Transposition
Advertisements

Site-specific recombination
Online Counseling Resource YCMOU ELearning Drive…
Homologous and Site-Specific Replication Chapter 19.
DNA/RNA Metabolism Blackburn & Gait, Ch. 5 Neidle, Ch. 4 Recombination understand basics of the reaction know advantages/disadvantages of recombination.
Retroviruses and Retroposons Chapter Introduction Figure 22.1.
Transposons & Mechanisms of Transposition
Transposition Evidence Mechanisms: DNA-mediated RNA-mediated.
DNA Recombination.
Chapter 11 Site-Specific Recombination & Transposition of DNA
DNA metabolism DNA replication DNA repair DNA recombination.
Lecture 9 Site Specific Recombination and Transposition Quiz 5 due today at 4 PM.
Chapter 15 Transposons.
Mobile DNA  Transposons By Anna Purna
Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement
Repair of Damaged DNA DNA is the only cellular macromolecule that can be repaired DNA damage includes: base modifications nucleotide deletions or insertions.
Bacterial Transposons Author Meenakshi Agarwal, Mehta Gunjan Mentor Dr. Santanu Ghosh.
Maintenance of genomes Copying the genome sequence (replication) Repairing damage to the genome sequence Rearranging genome sequences.
Homologous Recombination
Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement
Pierce, GENETICA, Zanichelli editore S.p.A. Copyright © 2005.
Transposons and Mechanisms of Transposition
DNA Recombination -- in real life --
Control of Crossing Over
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
RAG Proteins Shepherd Double-Strand Breaks to a Specific Pathway, Suppressing Error-Prone Repair, but RAG Nicking Initiates Homologous Recombination 
Origin of Chromosomal Translocations in Lymphoid Cancer
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)
Unexpected Structural Diversity in DNA Recombination
Take care of your chromosomes lest cancer take care of you
Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Addison V. Wright, James K. Nuñez, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Recombination Mechanisms
V(D)J Recombination in Ku86-Deficient Mice: Distinct Effects on Coding, Signal, and Hybrid Joint Formation  Molly A Bogue, Chiyu Wang, Chengming Zhu,
Epigenetics Drives RAGs to Recombination Riches
Mouse Genome Engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 for Study of Immune Function
Luther Davis, Nancy Maizels  Cell Reports 
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Radiation-sensitive severe combined immunodeficiency: The arguments for and against conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation—what to do? 
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
A New Way to Diversify Antibodies by DNA Transposition
V(D)J Recombination and RAG-Mediated Transposition in Yeast
Itai M. Pessach, MD, PhD, Luigi D. Notarangelo, MD 
The Mechanism and Regulation of Chromosomal V(D)J Recombination
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
The Fuss about Mus81  James E Haber, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer  Cell 
M.Joan Curcio, Marlene Belfort  Cell 
Translocation Mapping Exposes the Risky Lifestyle of B Cells
A CRISPR Approach to Gene Targeting
DNA repair: Rad52 – the means to an end
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Ignazio Maggio, Manuel A.F.V. Gonçalves  Trends in Biotechnology 
The Polymerases for V(D)J Recombination
Figure: Title: Transposons have inverted repeats and generate target repeats Caption: Transposons have inverted terminal repeats and generate direct.
Recombination: Holliday Junction Resolution and Crossover Formation
Duplication by single-strand annealing.
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Angela K Kennedy, David B Haniford, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
New Tools for Genome Modification in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Simple insertions and cointegrate formation.
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

VDJ Recombination Cell Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 411-414 (August 1998) David B Roth, Nancy L Craig  Cell  Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 411-414 (August 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81580-9

Figure 1 Transposition and VDJ Recombination Global similarities between transposition and VDJ recombination are illustrated. (A) The RAG recombinase recognizes recombination signal sequences (triangles) adjacent to V, D, or J coding elements (rectangles). Double-strand breaks are introduced between the RSS and the coding elements, generating a pair of coding ends (left) and a pair of signal ends (right). Coding ends join, forming a coding joint. Signal ends join, forming a signal joint. Both joining reactions involve ligation mediated by cellular repair factors (see text). (B) The transposase recognizes specific sequences at the ends of the transposon (triangles) and introduces a double-strand break separating the element from the flanking sequences. Rejoining of the broken donor ends (left) by the cellular repair machinery yields a repaired donor site. The transposon ends join to a new target DNA molecule (dashed line) via transesterification, generating a simple insertion (see text). Cell 1998 94, 411-414DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81580-9)

Figure 2 Transesterification Reactions Three RAG-mediated transesterification reactions are illustrated. (A) DSB formation proceeds by attack of the 3′ OH on a phosphodiester bond of the bottom strand, generating a hairpin coding end and a blunt signal end. (B) Hybrid joints are formed by attack of a 3′ OH of a signal end on a hairpin coding end. (C) Signal ends join to a target DNA molecule by transposition, a reaction involving attack of the 3′ OH groups on the phosphodiester bonds of the target DNA. Cell 1998 94, 411-414DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81580-9)

Figure 3 RAG-Mediated Chromosome Translocations via Single End Insertions Single-ended transposition of a signal end to the target chromosome forms a branched intermediate, that can be further processed by RAG-mediated cleavage to yield a hairpin end and an RSS joined to the partner chromosome. Joining of the two hairpin ends forms the reciprocal translocation product. Cell 1998 94, 411-414DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81580-9)

Figure 4 RAG-Mediated Chromosome Translocations via Double End Insertions Double-ended transposition of a pair of signal ends to the target chromosome generates a doubly nicked intermediate. RAG-mediated cleavage would excise the insert, leaving a pair of hairpin chromosome ends and an excised linear molecule with signal ends. Joining of the hairpin ends would produce a reciprocal translocation. The signal ends, which would be expected to carry short single-stranded extensions because of the staggered nature of target DNA cleavage (Hiom et al. 1998) might be joined to form a signal joint or could undergo further processing and perhaps additional transposition events. Cell 1998 94, 411-414DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81580-9)