Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 105, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Koen E. Merkus, Menno W.J. Prins, Cornelis Storm  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Mapping Three-Dimensional Stress and Strain Fields within a Soft Hydrogel Using a Fluorescence Microscope  Matthew S. Hall, Rong Long, Chung-Yuen Hui,
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
Single-Molecule TPM Studies on the Conversion of Human Telomeric DNA
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
pH-Controlled Two-Step Uncoating of Influenza Virus
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
A Model of H-NS Mediated Compaction of Bacterial DNA
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Mechanisms of Receptor/Coreceptor-Mediated Entry of Enveloped Viruses
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Shozeb Haider, Gary N. Parkinson, Stephen Neidle  Biophysical Journal 
Michael Adrian, Fernaldo Richtia Winnerdy, Brahim Heddi, Anh Tuân Phan 
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Edmond Chow, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
Optical Pushing: A Tool for Parallelized Biomolecule Manipulation
Single Vesicle Assaying of SNARE-Synaptotagmin-Driven Fusion Reveals Fast and Slow Modes of Both Docking and Fusion and Intrasample Heterogeneity  Sune.
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Liqiang Dai, Holger Flechsig, Jin Yu  Biophysical Journal 
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Quantifying Biomolecule Diffusivity Using an Optimal Bayesian Method
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Katherine Launer-Felty, C. Jason Wong, James L. Cole 
H. Wang, R. Bash, S.M. Lindsay, D. Lohr  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
A Kinetic Model for Type I and II IP3R Accounting for Mode Changes
Effect of Grafting on Aggregation of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Phosphatase Specificity and Pathway Insulation in Signaling Networks
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Effects of MacroH2A and H2A
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Cooperative Nucleotide Binding in Hsp90 and Its Regulation by Aha1
Mitsuhiro Sugawa, Kaoru A. Okada, Tomoko Masaike, Takayuki Nishizaka 
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (August 2017)
Félix Proulx-Giraldeau, Thomas J. Rademaker, Paul François 
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Ricksen S. Winardhi, Qingnan Tang, Jin Chen, Mingxi Yao, Jie Yan 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
A Model of H-NS Mediated Compaction of Bacterial DNA
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 705-715 (February 2014) Tethered Particle Motion Reveals that LacI·DNA Loops Coexist with a Competitor- Resistant but Apparently Unlooped Conformation  Joel D. Revalee, Gerhard A. Blab, Henry D. Wilson, Jason D. Kahn, Jens-Christian Meiners  Biophysical Journal  Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 705-715 (February 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The principle of loop detection by TPM. The unlooped state is proposed to be a combination of (U2) doubly- and (U1) singly-occupied DNA (purple, with operator binding sites in red) with their corresponding interconversions at rates k+ and k−, respectively. The substrate DNA in complex with LacI (brown), while in the U1 state, reversibly loops (at rate kL) to give state L, and L unloops (at rate kU). The beads, tethered to DNA, are shown (light blue); arrows bracketing them illustrate bead planar RMS (Brownian) motion. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 705-715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A partial time trace of two-dimensional averaged bead RMS displacement for a 9C14 TPM experiment with its corresponding RMS histogram. Several loops are readily visible as sustained dips in bead RMS motion (averaged over a 10-s running window); this sample shows only two populations with different bead RMS values. The average difference in r between looped and unlooped states is ∼29 nm; because this is a two-dimensional average, the three-dimensional difference in tether length is greater. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 705-715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cumulative distributions of looped and unlooped lifetimes. The top two graphs give the looped (A) and unlooped (B) lifetimes of the DNA constructs 9C14, 11C12, and UBC (studied previously by Mehta and Kahn (16)) measured through TPM experiments. The bottom two graphs give the loop (C) and unlooped (D) lifetimes of the unbent DNA constructs (i.e., 702 Unbent, 700 OSYM, and UBC)—also from single-molecule measurements. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 705-715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Schematic of a single-molecule competition assay. The looped complex (L) breaks down into an unlooped state (U) in which it is available for competition. Upon competitor DNA binding, a sandwich complex (S) is formed which has equal chance of becoming loop-ready (U) again or being competed off entirely and becoming free DNA (F). Note that of these states, only L is observed as a looped state. States U, S, and F are all seen as unlooped states and are thus indistinguishable in the SMCA. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 705-715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Example traces of SMCAs with 9C14-LacI loops. (Top trace) An SMCA with 9C14 as the tethered DNA substrate and 100 nM of 40-bp double-stranded DNA oligomers containing a single symmetric/ideal operator as competitor. (Bottom trace) An SMCA with 9C14 as the substrate, but in this case 50 nM of full sequence (unlabeled) 9C14 is used as the competitor DNA. Both traces (top and bottom) show similar results, indicating that the competitor DNA sequence, so long as it contains a symmetric (ideal) operator, does not greatly affect the competitive resistance of the LacI-DNA complex. Because two different polystyrene beads sizes (diameters 0.44 and 0.54 μm, respectively) were employed in the top and bottom traces, there is an offset in the vertical axis. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 705-715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Example traces of SMCAs with unbent DNAs. The three graphs above give SMCA traces of UBC (top), 700 OSYM (middle), and 702 Unbent (bottom). In each graph, time zero (highlighted by a vertical red line) is the time at which competitor DNA was flowed into the chamber. As opposed to the RMS traces from the intrinsically curved DNA 9C14 in Figs. 2 and 5, all unbent DNA constructs showed multiple levels of looped RMS. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 705-715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A proposed-new kinetic model of DNA competition. After a loop (L) has broken down (U), we propose that three pathways are possible: LacI (brown) can reform a loop (L) on its substrate DNA (purple and red); or it can interact nonspecifically (yellow ellipse) with the adjacent DNA (U∗); or it can form a sandwich (S) with competitor DNA (red and aqua)—at which point it has equal chance of being competed off (F) or returning to the intermediate step (U). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 106, 705-715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.024) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions