MuonGeoModel – recent developments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
Advertisements

ACAT05 - DESY Zeuthen125/05/2005 Detector Description of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and H8 Muon Testbeam D. Pomarède CEA/DAPNIA/SEDI/LILAS - Saclay.
12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN1 Muon Detector Description status and plans summary of contributions from Laurent Chevalier, Andrea Dell’Acqua, Jean Francois.
Muon Spectrometer Nomenclature Kevin Black/Vivek Jain/Stephane Willocq went through various documents and produced what we think are the correct names.
MuonGeoModel Structure Clients Validation run-time Conditions EDM Raw geometry issues Available Tools Status Connection with the COOL Alignment (A-lines)
Identifiers for Everyone J. Bogart Core Software Workshop April
1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.
SSD offline status Offline week CERN, 7 July 2008 Enrico Fragiacomo on behalf of ALICE SSD.
Using ROOT geometry for FVTX reconstruction Zhengyun You Peking University Los Alamos National Lab Jan 22, 2007.
Implementation of BeamCal in Mokka Alexandra Popescu, Aura Rosca West University of Timisoara FCAL Collaboration Meeting 6-7 May, Krakow, Poland.
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
28/05/2008Muon Combined Performance Meeting 1 Muon Detector Description and Simulation status and plans summary of contributions from Laurent Chevalier,
Software Solutions for Variable ATLAS Detector Description J. Boudreau, V. Tsulaia University of Pittsburgh R. Hawkings, A. Valassi CERN A. Schaffer LAL,
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
Chapter 8 – Main Memory (Pgs ). Overview  Everything to do with memory is complicated by the fact that more than 1 program can be in memory.
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
Trigger Requirements first thoughts from Alessandro Di Mattia, Giovanni Siragusa, Sergio Grancagnolo, Andrea Ventura, Michela Biglietti, Diana Scannicchio.
ATLAS Detector Description Database Vakho Tsulaia University of Pittsburgh 3D workshop, CERN 14-Dec-2004.
A few issues about MuonGeoModel stefania spagnolo 2/7/08.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
Muon System Detector Description and Simulation Status, Developments and Validation ATLAS Muon Week, CERN, April S. Baranov, N. Benekos, L. Chevalier,
24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.
Clash Cleanup and Cutout Implementation Dennis Wright ATLAS Muon Week 9 June 2008.
Geometry 4 I.Hrivnacova IPN, Orsay Most slides thanks to M. Asai, SLAC Cours Paris June 2007.
Muon PRS meeting January 21 st, 2003 Norbert Neumeister CERN EP / HEPHY Vienna Muon Barrel Geometry Description.
The GeoModel Toolkit for Detector Description Joe Boudreau Vakho Tsulaia University of Pittsburgh CHEP’04 Interlaken.
Status of ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Simulations With GEANT4 G. Azuelos , A. Chekhtman , J. Dodd , A. Kiryunin , M. Leltchouk , R. Mazini , G.
14/11/2007CERN - Muon Week1 Detector Description status and plans Laurent Chevalier Dapnia – Saclay Stefania Spagnolo Univ. del Salento and INFN Lecce.
Tutorial on Testbeam Software - CERN, March 10th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN CTB_G4Sim Simulation.
1 MuonGeoModel status report focus on issues relevant to , 20 Access to Condition DB with M. Verducci, R. Harrington MDT deformations with I. Logashenco.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
ALFA GeoModel implementation and simulation status  ATHENA, what is our job?  ALFA GeoModel implementation  MC simulation – first steps  Problems 
Update G4builder issues Talk written almost entirely by Stan Bentvelsen with a few updates from Christopher Lester ATLAS G4 Workshop December 2000 CAMBRIDGE.
RpcPrepRawData 1 The conversion from the online RPC data structure (trigger-driven) to offline RpcPrepRawData is not trivial: generally, one online hit.
30/09/081 Muon Spectrometer Detector Description Outline: - Present situation - Dead Matter - Validation - GeoModel.. Laurent Chevalier, Andrea Dell’Acqua,
12/06/2008Muon Week - CERN1 Muon Detector Description status and plans summary of contributions from Laurent Chevalier, Andrea Dell’Acqua, Jean Francois.
18/04/2007Muon Week - CERN1 Detector Description status report Laurent Chevalier Stefania Spagnolo.
Moore/MUID validation with The MOORE group.
LAV Simulation Emanuele Leonardi INFN Roma Photon Veto meeting 08/02/2011.
27/02/04 ATLAS weekTileCal Athena tutorial, part 21 TileCal Athena tutorial Part 2: Reading GEANT hits from ZEBRA and POOL Reading HLT and testbeam ByteStream.
August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ACOS Report ATLAS Software Workshop December 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Detector SimOOlation activities in ATLAS A.Dell’Acqua CERN-EP/ATC May 19th, 1999.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
New features in ROOT geometrical modeller for representing non-ideal geometries René Brun, Federico Carminati, Andrei Gheata, Mihaela Gheata CHEP’06,
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).
JUNO Offline Geometry Management
Memory Management.
ALFA & its Simulation in the Athena framework status
Complex Geometry Visualization TOol
Jon Couchman (UCL), Hans Drevermann (CERN), Gary Taylor (UCSC)
Massimo Masera INFN sezione di Torino
WP3 Educational and Outreach Portal
Why Micromegas? Muon Upgrade Workshop, 27/01/2012 Jörg Wotschack.
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
Muon Spectrometer Detector Description
MuonGeoModel status of progress on main items
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
So far in memory management…
Update primary numbers active part
Contents Memory types & memory hierarchy Virtual memory (VM)
Muon Group Software Report
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Mdt example now: MdtReadoutElement = 1 multilayer
MuonGeoModel: status and plans
Implementation of Chamber Misalignments and Deformations in the
Low pt muon identification
Presentation transcript:

MuonGeoModel – recent developments Most of the clashes observed are due to “artificial” overlaps of station envelops with inert materials station envelops of a standard shape (trapezoid) are suitable for a hierarchical description of the geometry: Muon Envelop stations components (MDT, RPC, TGC, CSC, and also CRO, CHV, DED, ect.) with transforms defined w.r.t. a station frame sometimes small components (cro, chv) at the “border” of a station require a large envelop of the station (almost empty) which, then, conflicts (at the center) with other structures Geo2G4 transforms any volume in GeoModel (also station envelops made of air) in Logical G4 volumes (overlaps generate unpredictable result of the tracking process) G4AssemblyVolume is a helper class which allows several logical volumes to be combined together without common mother envelope Recently, functionality has been added to Geo2G4 in order to allow GeoModel volumes made of “Ether” to be transformed into G4Assembly volumes (i.e. in G4 the station envelop disappear if the station material is declared “Ether”)

MuonGeoModel – recent developments Minimal changes are required in MuonGeoModel to describe stations as assemblies in G4 BUT there’s one important drawback: copy numbers of assembly components are lost a different identification scheme has to be setup the Muon Sensitive Detectors have to be modified to conform to the new scheme MuonGeoModel-00-03-53 allows to describe stations as assemblies if a switch is activated Station copy numbers (embedding StationPhi and StationEta) are modified – used as base for assembly components copy numbers, must be positive and large in G4 assembly components are given names like “av_WWW_impr_XXX_YYY_ZZZ_ID” where WWW – assembly volume instance number XXX – assembly volume imprint number YYY – name of the placed logical volume (will keep track of station Type, subType and Techn.y) ZZZ – logical volume index inside the assembly volume ID – GeoNameTag: will keep track of info like doubletR, doubletPhi, Swap flag (for Rpc), multilayer (for MDT and CSC), stationEta and Phi (for Tgc) _ID is new; introduced for our needs in a ATLAS version of the relevant G4 class

MuonGeoModel – recent developments a modified version of the Muon Sensitive Detectors has been setup to test the simulation successful exercise but the memory allocation for a simulation with MuonSpectrometer only is ~550MB, compared to previous ~350MB unaffordable at the moment Many thanks to A. Dell’Acqua and V. Tsulaia for the cooperation and the necessary developments in Geo2G4 and Atlas G4 MuonGeoModel-00-03-53 contains a few other changes: fix of BOG tubes numbering (hopefully solving the hits out of position observed at reconstruction level) special shape for MDT multilayer (with half tubes removed or added at the extremity of tube-layers) in order to remove clashes between stations in contact (when assemblies will be viable) Needs testing and fixes for 2 more known and trivial clashes ready to start testing R’ and R’’ light - no obvious outcome with the database tag available ~15 days (including Easter) before release 12.0.0