Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School 2007-08

The Moral Purpose To support every student at Meadow Homes Elementary School as if he/she were our own child.

Session Outcomes Review the key strategic initiatives that we implemented as a school community last year Predict our student performance on the CST aligned to our strategic initiatives Review our actual student performance on the CST linked to our strategic initiatives Work in grade level teams to follow a similar inquiry process to review our grade level CST data. Review our AYP, API, and HPSG status

The Leadership and Learning Matrix Lucky High results, low understanding of implementation components Replication of success unlikely Leading High results, high understanding of implementation components Replication of success likely Student Achievement Losing Low results, low understanding of implementation components Learning Low results, high understanding of implementation components Replication of mistakes unlikely Degree and Quality of Implementation Center for Performance Assessment

Our Collective Expectation for Student Achievement Our staff holds ourselves collectively responsible to ensure that every student within our school achieves academic success by: Engaging all students in instructional activities that are real world, relevant and standards aligned. Helping students establish meaningful learning targets where they are able to align their work with exemplary grade level work and then plan to achieve this level of work with teacher and fellow student support. Providing all students with timely descriptive feedback that supports student achievement in an ongoing manner. Celebrating student success both formally and informally

Specific Strategic Initiatives Initiative Description Student Group Focus Expected CST Performance TBD

Meadow Homes Elementary Demographics – Enrollment Over Time

Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance Overall

Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Level

Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Subgroup

Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Subgroup 2

Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Grade Level

Meadow Homes Elementary CST ELA Performance by Grade Level

Meadow Homes Elementary School Footprint ELA:CST 2007- 2008 Advanced 402-600 Proficient 350-401 5% / 27 15% / 82 350 33% / 188 28% / 155 Basic 300-349 Below Basic 262-299 Below Basic 269-299 # Students Tested: 565 20% / 113 Far Below Basic 150-261

Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance

Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance

Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Subgroup

Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Subgroup 2

Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Grade

Meadow Homes Elementary CST Math Performance by Grade

Meadow Homes Elementary School Footprint Math: CST 2007- 2008 Advanced 402-600 Proficient 350-401 8% / 47 24% / 136 350 29% / 163 31% / 172 Basic 300-349 Below Basic 262-299 Below Basic 269-299 # Students Tested: 563 8% / 45 Far Below Basic 150-261 8/21/08

Meadow Homes Elementary CST 5th Grade Science Performance

Meadow Homes Elementary CST 5th Grade Science Performance

Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade

Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade

Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade for Mt Meadow Homes Elementary CELDT Performance by Grade for Mt. Diablo School District

Inquiry Questions What were your goals for students last year? What strategies did we employ to ensure that all students achieved the standards-aligned achievement targets? What are your predictions about student performance for your grade level? Use the tools in the following slides to help you carry out your grade level inquiry.

Inquiry Protocol

Inquiry Protocol

Inquiry Protocol

Inquiry Protocol

Inquiry Protocol

Comparing AYP and API Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) AYP and Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Academic Performance Index (API) Performance Levels Proficient Not Proficient Advanced (1000) Proficient (875) Basic (700) Below Basic (500) Far Below Basic (200) Calculation Percentage of students who score proficient or advanced in Math and ELA as defined by each state Student performance levels for multiple content areas are weighted and used to develop an index score that is measured and compared over two years to show growth

HPSG Criteria

API Growth for Meadow Homes Elementary

Did We Meet our API Growth Targets? API Group API Base Score for 2007 API Growth Score for 2008 API Growth Target for 2008 Did we Meet Our API Growth Target for 2008 Overall School 605 636 10 Yes Hispanic 587 622 11 Economically Disadvantaged 590 624 English Learners 580 607

Did we Meet our AYP Targets in 2008 AYP Group ELA Participation (95%) ELA % Proficient or Advanced (35.2%) Math Participation Math Proficient or Advanced (37%) Overall School 100% 19.7% 32.8% (SH) Hispanic 16.0% 31.2% (SH) Economically Disadvantaged 17.7% 30.9% (SH) English Learners 13.6% 28.0%

Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School 2007-08