Beamforming Array Gain to Intended and Unintended Users

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Underwater Acoustic MIMO Channel Capacity
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1110r1 September 2013 Submission Beam codebook design scheme for IEEE802.11aj DU GuanglongSlide 1 Date: Presenter:
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0808 July 2015 Songnam Hong, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency-independent Digital Precoder for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0323r0 SubmissionRon Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Views on ah Use Cases Date: Authors: March 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0577r1 Submission May 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Path Loss Model for Scenario 1 Date: Authors: Slide 1.
1 PROPAGATION ASPECTS FOR SMART ANTENNAS IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS JACK H. WINTERS AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ July 17,
Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for n/ac.
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0889r0 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1501r0 Submission September 2006 C. Wright, Azimuth SystemsSlide 1 Multipath Testing in a Conducted Environment Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE 19-15/0084r0 Nov 2015 Igal Kotzer, General MotorsSlide 1 On The Intra-Vehicle Channel Model Date: 21-Oct-2015 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1321r0 Submission Reducing Explicit MIMO Compressed Beamforming Feedback Overhead for ax November 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0889r3 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Performance Gains from CCA Optimization Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0664r0 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Mobile Radio Propagation - Small-Scale Fading and Multipath
WUR Link Budget Analysis
WUR Link Budget Analysis
Channel Model Considerations for P802.11af
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
Estimated delay spread of industrial plant
Beamforming Array Gain to Intended and Unintended Users
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2005
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
SC LOS/NLOS Channel Measurements
On Tap Angular Spread and Kronecker Structure of WLAN Channel Models
Small-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Wednesday, November 07, 2018 Little Wireless and Smart Antennas Jack H. Winters 2/26/04.
Summery of Channel Measurement for the ay Channel Model Document
A Framework for MIMO Operation over mmWave Links
Wednesday, November 21, 2018 Little Wireless and Smart Antennas Jack H. Winters 2/26/04.
Validation of n Channel Models
802.11n Channel Model Validation
Month 2002 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Nov 2003
Channel Measurements in Corridors for TGac
Average SNR Definition CID 3241
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Indoor Channel Measurements for TGac
Multi-User MIMO Channel Measurements
802.11ac Channel Modeling Authors: Jan 19, 2009 Month Year
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Overview of CWPAN SG5 QLINKPAN
HEW Outdoor Channel Model Discussions
Per-User Data Rate, Band and Bandwidth Options for VHT
Submission Title: [Wireless Display Throughput Requirements]
VHT in Below 6 GHz Frequency Bands
VHT in Below 6 GHz Frequency Bands
Submission Title: [IMST time-angular characteristics analysis]
Performance Gains from CCA Optimization
Doppler Measurements for Mobile Devices
Introductory TGah Proposal
Simon Hyun, Brett Douglas, Eldad Perahia, Dave Petsko
Sean Coffey, Ph.D., Chris Heegard, Ph.D.
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
IEEE Regulatory SC Orlando Closing Report
Comparison of Coordinated BF and Nulling with JT
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar 2016
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Measurements for Distributed-MU-MIMO
Presentation transcript:

Beamforming Array Gain to Intended and Unintended Users March 2013 doc.: IEEE 802.19-09/xxxxr0 March 2013 Beamforming Array Gain to Intended and Unintended Users Date: 2013-03-20 Authors: Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

March 2013 Introduction In this presentation we show array gain experienced by intended and unintended users Unintended user typically sees significantly lower array gain than the intended user because: Beamforming weights are matched to the intended user’s channel Any difference between intended/unintended users’ channels reduces array gain at unintended user Unintended and intended user’s channels are different due to different multipath propagation Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

Array Gain Computation March 2013 Array Gain Computation Draw channel to intended user & form BF vectors based on this channel Draw channel to unintended user Unintended user’s channel may have different statistics than intended, e.g., different delay spread or K factor Array gain = RX power at unintended user with BF on versus with no BF Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

March 2013 Channel Models Channel models from Jagganatham-Erceg paper [1] Intended user (indoors): exponential PDP with spike with 6.3 dB spike + LoS component on 1st tap 14 nsec/7.5 dB are median values for delay spread/K factor for 1st tap for LOS co-polar at 3 meters (plotted below) 13 nsec/11.7 dB are 90% values for delay spread/K factor for 1st tap for LOS co-polar at 3 meters Because shorter delay spread yields more array gain, 90% value for delay spread is chosen at 10% point of CDF (smaller than median) Unintended user (outdoors): 100 nsec rms delay spread, 0 dB K factor on 1st tap, no spike [2] Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

March 2013 Results for Nt=2/3/4/6/8 Using median values for delay spread/K factor and 90% point of multipath array gain Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

March 2013 Results for Nt=2/3/4/6/8 Using 90% values for delay spread/K factor and 50% point of multipath array gain Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

Summary of Results March 2013 90% Array Gain Max Array Gain Considerably smaller array gain with 90 % delay spread/K-factor and 50% point of multipath compared to 50% delay spread/K-factor and 90% point of multipath With either choice of parameters array gain seen is considerably smaller than maximum value of 10log10(Nt) 90% Array Gain Max Array Gain Difference (dB) 2x1 2.1 3.0 0.9 3x1 4.8 1.8 4x1 3.8 6.0 2.2 6x1 7.8 8x1 5.7 9.0 3.3 Median values for delay spread/K factor and 90% point of multipath array gain 50% Array Gain Max Array Gain Difference (dB) 2x1 1.1 3.0 1.9 3x1 4.8 2.9 4x1 2.6 6.0 3.4 6x1 3.7 7.8 4.1 8x1 4.7 9.0 4.3 90% values for delay spread/K factor and median values for multipath array gain Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

March 2013 Conclusion In this presentation we show that beamforming array gain is reduced to the unintended user because of different propagation channel For 4 transmit antenna case gain reduction is in the 2-3.4 dB range, depending on the statistical analysis method applied Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

March 2013 References [1] Aditya K. Jagannatham and Vinko Erceg, “MIMO Indoor WLAN Channel Measurements and Parameter Modeling at 5.25 GHz”, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004, VTC2004-Fall., Vol. 1, 26-29 Sep'04, Pages:106 - 110, Vol. 1. [2] Mark E. Beach, Matthew W. Webb, and Carmen Stan, “Virtual MIMO performance in a measured outdoor-to-indoor cellular scenario”, Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Proceedings of the 5th European Conference, 11-15 April 201, Pages: 2933 – 2937. Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

March 2013 Appendix Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

Sensitivity to delay spread March 2013 Sensitivity to delay spread Nt = 4, Intended user has 6.3 dB spike + 7.5 dB K factor on 1st tap, and unintended user has 0 dB K factor on 1st tap, no spike Blue: vary delay spread of intended user while keeping unintended user delay spread equal to 100 nsec Green: vary delay spread of unintended user while keeping intended user delay spread equal to 14 nsec Increasing delay spread of intended or unintended user significantly reduces array gain This illustrates the importance of properly modeling the channel statistics to intended/unintended user, e.g., indoor/outdoor Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

Sensitivity to K-factor March 2013 Nt = 4, Intended user has 14 nsec rms delay spread and 6.3 dB spike on 1st tap, and unintended user has 100 nsec rms delay spread and no spike Blue: vary K-factor of intended user while keeping unintended user K-factor equal to 0 dB Green: vary K-factor of unintended user while keeping unintended user K-factor equal to 7.5 dB Increasing K factor of intended or unintended user increases array gain, although not considerably beyond nominal values of 7.5/0 dB K factor to intended/unintended Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation

Median vs. 90% Values March 2013 Blue: Median rms delay spread and K-factor, 90% point for multipath Green: 90% values for rms delay spread and K-factor, 50% point for multipath Median K-factor with 90% multipath array gain gives 3.7 dB array gain, whereas 90% K-factor with 50% multipath array gives only 2.6 dB Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Corporation