Kt/V underestimates the hemodialysis dose in women and small men

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Temporary hemodialysis catheters: recent advances
Advertisements

Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 81, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Nutrition and chronic kidney disease
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Linear and logistic regression analysis
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Anemia management in chronic kidney disease
Tuberculosis and tubulointerstitial nephritis: an intriguing puzzle
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
C-reactive protein and dialysis access
Alex Castellarnau, Michael Werner, Roman Günthner, Marten Jakob 
Determinants of phosphorus mobilization during hemodialysis
C-reactive protein and dialysis access
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
M. Kraemer, C. Rode, V. Wizemann  Kidney International 
Joel D. Kopple, Xiaofei Zhu, Nancy L. Lew, Edmund G. Lowrie 
Disease-Specific Predictive Formulas for Energy Expenditure in the Dialysis Population  Enric Vilar, PhD, Ashwini Machado, RN, Andrew Garrett, PhD, Robert.
Volume 76, Pages S50-S99 (August 2009)
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
The progression of chronic kidney disease: A 10-year population-based study of the effects of gender and age  B.O. Eriksen, O.C. Ingebretsen  Kidney International 
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 5-6 (January 2010)
How to interpret the eGFR in patients with small body surface area
The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): Clinical outcome as a function of body surface area  Edmund G. Lowrie, Zhensheng Li, Norma Ofsthun,
Comorbidity and confounding in end-stage renal disease
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Dietary phosphorus is associated with greater left ventricular mass
Early mortality in dialysis and adequacy of predialysis renal care: the picture is more complex than we thought  Nicolas Rognant, Maurice Laville  Kidney.
The importance of increased dialysis and anemia management for infant survival in pregnant women on hemodialysis  Sai Subhodhini Reddy, Jean L. Holley 
Nutrition and chronic kidney disease
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Body weight is a fluctuating parameter in hemodialysis patients
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Nephrology Crosswords: Hemodialysis
Prescribing and monitoring hemodialysis dose
Blood pressure targets in hemodialysis patients
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 73, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp™) in children with chronic renal failure
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Effects of hemodialysis on cardiac function
Abdulla K. Salahudeen, Erwin H. Fleischmann, John D. Bower 
Alternate-day dialysis may be needed for hemodialysis patients
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Juan M. Lopez-Gomez, Eduardo Verde, Rafael Perez-Garcia 
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Nephrology Crossword: Glomerulonephritis
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Dialysis dose and gender: A different hypothesis
Volume 81, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Bioelectric impedance vector distribution in peritoneal dialysis patients with different hydration status  Antonio Piccoli, for the Italian CAPD-BIA Study.
The hypothesis that abnormal BH4 metabolism impairs kidney function
Manuel Prado, Laura M. Roa, Alfonso Palma, Jose A. Milen 
Volume 75, Issue 9, Pages (May 2009)
Antioxidant therapy in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review
Associations of hemodialysis dose and session length with mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand patients  M.R. Marshall, B.G. Byrne, P.G. Kerr,
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Stephen Pastan, J. Michael Soucie, William M. McClellan 
Ronen Levi, Justin Silver  Kidney International 
Estimation of lean body mass in children
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Kt/V underestimates the hemodialysis dose in women and small men Elaine M. Spalding, Shahid M. Chandna, Andrew Davenport, Ken Farrington  Kidney International  Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 348-355 (August 2008) DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.185 Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Relationship between Watson volume (V) and dry weight in 328 HD patients. The lines displayed represent best linear regression fit in men and women. HD, hemodialysis. Kidney International 2008 74, 348-355DOI: (10.1038/ki.2008.185) Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Relationship between Wb and dry weight. Separate non-linear regression lines (of the form y=aWb) are shown for a=1, b=0.1–1.0, at increments of 0.1. For details see text. Bold lines represent the curves for b=0.67 and b=1. For clarity data points omitted. Kidney International 2008 74, 348-355DOI: (10.1038/ki.2008.185) Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Relationship between Watson volume (V), body surface area, and W0.67 in 328 HD patients. Upper panel: relationship between Watson V and body surface area in 328 HD patients clustered into four groups—small women (<mean V for women), large women (>mean V for women), small men (<mean V for men), and large men (> mean V for men). *P<0.001 for comparison with all other groups. Lower panel: relationship between Watson V and W0.67 in 328 HD patients clustered into four groups—small women (<mean V for women), large women (>mean V for women), small men (<mean V for men), and large men (>mean V for men). *P<0.001 for comparison with all other groups. P<0.007 for comparison between small and large women. HD, hemodialysis. Kidney International 2008 74, 348-355DOI: (10.1038/ki.2008.185) Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Histograms of distribution by gender of Kt (upper panel), Kt/BSA (middle panel), and Kt/W0.67 values (lower panel) equivalent to target Kt/V of 1.2 in 328 hemodialysis patients. Kidney International 2008 74, 348-355DOI: (10.1038/ki.2008.185) Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Plots of estimates of ‘required’ Kt against Watson V. For definitions of ‘double reciprocal’ and ‘multiplicative,’ see reference Lowrie et al.20 and Materials and Methods section. Curves were fitted using the LOESS locally weighted regression technique. Continuous lines represent relationship in men. Broken lines represent relationship in women. Kidney International 2008 74, 348-355DOI: (10.1038/ki.2008.185) Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Equivalent Kt/BSA and Kt/W0.67 for a range of prescribed Kt/V in 328 HD patients. Left panel: equivalent Kt/BSA for a range of prescribed Kt/V in 328 HD patients clustered into four groups—small women (<mean V for women), large women (>mean V for women), small men (<mean V for men), and large men (>mean V for men). Right panel: equivalent Kt/W0.67 for a range of prescribed Kt/V in 328 HD patients clustered into four groups—small women (<mean V for women), large women (>mean V for women), small men (<mean V for men), and large men (>mean V for men). BSA, body surface area; HD, hemodialysis. Kidney International 2008 74, 348-355DOI: (10.1038/ki.2008.185) Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Kt/Wb equivalent to Kt/V=1.2 for a range of b between 0 and 1 in 328 HD patients. In the upper panel, mean values for female patients are shown relative to mean values in men. In the middle panel, mean values are shown in tertiles of V, relative to mean values in medium tertile. In the lower panel, mean values are shown in four groups (small women (<mean V for women), large women (>mean V for women), small men (<mean V for men), and large men (>mean V for men), relative to the values in large men). The dashed vertical lines in each panel represent the values of b, 0.5378 and 0.67, respectively. The former being the power of weight used in the Haycock formula for BSA, and the latter, an approximation to ‘metabolic size’.BSA, body surface area; HD, hemodialysis. Kidney International 2008 74, 348-355DOI: (10.1038/ki.2008.185) Copyright © 2008 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions