Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Th9 Cells Drive Host Immunity against Gastrointestinal Worm Infection
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Next Generation Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostics-Principles and Application to Targeted Resequencing for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy  Karl V. Voelkerding,
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Molecular Characterization, Reactivation, and Depletion of Latent HIV
HIV-1 Vpu Mediates HLA-C Downregulation
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Enhanced sensitivity to inhibition of SHP2, STAT5, and Gab2 expression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)‏ by Michaela Scherr, Anuhar Chaturvedi, Karin.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Gene-Expression Variation Within and Among Human Populations
A Theranostic “SMART” Aptamer for Targeted Therapy of Prostate Cancer
Targeted Complementation of MHC Class II Deficiency by Intrathymic Delivery of Recombinant Adenoviruses  Ronald Rooke, Caroline Waltzinger, Christophe.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Control of HIV Infection In Vivo Using Gene Therapy with a Secreted Entry Inhibitor  Alexander Falkenhagen, Jastaranpreet Singh, Sabah Asad, Danila Leontyev,
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages (August 2014)
Gang Wang, Na Zhao, Ben Berkhout, Atze T Das  Molecular Therapy 
Strong Promoters Are the Key to Highly Efficient, Noninflammatory and Noncytotoxic Adenoviral-Mediated Transgene Delivery into the Brain in Vivo  Christian.
GFP to BFP Conversion: A Versatile Assay for the Quantification of CRISPR/Cas9- mediated Genome Editing  Astrid Glaser, Bradley McColl, Jim Vadolas  Molecular.
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Kevin G. Haworth, Christina Ironside, Zachary K. Norgaard, Willimark M
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Characterising dermis expansion and gene expression changes during mouse development (related to Fig 1)‏ Characterising dermis expansion and gene expression.
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Rational Design of Therapeutic siRNAs: Minimizing Off-targeting Potential to Improve the Safety of RNAi Therapy for Huntington's Disease  Ryan L Boudreau,
Tobias Maetzig, Jens Ruschmann, Lea Sanchez Milde, Courteney K
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Single-Shot, Multicycle Suicide Gene Therapy by Replication-Competent Retrovirus Vectors Achieves Long-Term Survival Benefit in Experimental Glioma  Chien-Kuo.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Thomas Gaj, Benjamin E Epstein, David V Schaffer  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Cell-surface expression of CD4 reduces HIV-1 infectivity by blocking Env incorporation in a Nef- and Vpu-inhibitable manner  Juan Lama, Aram Mangasarian,
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
A Double-Switch Vector System Positively Regulates Transgene Expression by Endogenous microRNA Expression (miR-ON Vector)  Mario Amendola, Alice Giustacchini,
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 803-811 (April 2010) HIV Sequence Variation Associated With env Antisense Adoptive T-cell Therapy in the hNSG Mouse Model  Rithun Mukherjee, Gabriela Plesa, Scott Sherrill-Mix, Max W Richardson, James L Riley, Frederic D Bushman  Molecular Therapy  Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 803-811 (April 2010) DOI: 10.1038/mt.2009.316 Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Analysis of hNSG mice with ~4–11% VRX494 envAS-vector modified T-cells and challenged with HIVNL4-3 or HIVBaL. (a) The VRX494 vector. (b) Time line of mouse transplantation and infection. The hNSG mice were transplanted on day 0, then challenged with HIVNL4-3 or HIVBaL on day 30. (c) Flow cytometry analysis of transduction of CD4+ T-cells with envAS. Cells with high transduction levels were obtained as evidenced by GFP detection. (d) Analysis of the levels of T-cell engraftment. (e) Analysis of the levels of engraftment of VRX494-transduced cells, analyzed by sorting GFP+ cells. (f) Analysis of the level of HIV p24 antigen in serum at 48 days after infection. cPPT, central polypurine tract; CTS, central termination sequence; envAS, env antisense; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; hNSG, humanized NOD/SCID IL-2Rγnull; LTR, long terminal repeat; RRE, rev-responsive element. Molecular Therapy 2010 18, 803-811DOI: (10.1038/mt.2009.316) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The HIVNL4-3 genome, showing the regions targeted by the VRX494 envAS, and the HIV env amplicons used in this study. The numbering in the env gene refers to the HIVNL4-3 genome. The envAS-targeted region extends from 6,601–7,538 (see blow-up). Three amplicons were designed to recover potential deletions and A→G changes. The relative positions and length of the amplicons (including 454 adapters and barcodes) are shown. Three amplicons were similarly designed in the homologous region of the HIVBaL genome. envAS, env antisense; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus. Molecular Therapy 2010 18, 803-811DOI: (10.1038/mt.2009.316) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Box plots illustrating the types of base substitutions that accumulated during growth of HIV-1 in hNSG mice. (a) Base substitutions that accumulated during growth of HIVBaL in the vector-treated and control mice. (b) Base substitutions that accumulated during growth of HIVNL4-3 in the vector-treated and control mice. The boxes comprise all sequences with proportion changes in the middle two quartiles. Outliers, defined as sequences beyond 1.5 times the interquartile range, are plotted as open black circles. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; hNSG, humanized NOD/SCID IL-2Rγnull. Molecular Therapy 2010 18, 803-811DOI: (10.1038/mt.2009.316) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of the 100 sequences with the greatest enrichment of A–G transitions from the VRX494-treated and control mice challenged with HIVBaL. The most enriched sequences from viruses grown in vector-treated mice (top) are compared to the most enriched sequences from controls (bottom). The bases were color-coded as indicated at the bottom of the figure. Only base positions that were A (in yellow) in the starting viral stock are shown, those substituted with G are shown in red. Grey indicates sequence gaps. Molecular Therapy 2010 18, 803-811DOI: (10.1038/mt.2009.316) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Statistical analysis of base substitution frequencies in vector-treated and control mice. For the statistical analysis, each mouse was treated as an individual measure of proportions. (a) Comparison of vector-treated and control mice after HIVBaL challenge. (b) Comparison of vector-treated and control mice after HIVNL4-3 challenge. In each panel, the x axis indicates the extent of enrichment per sequence for each base substitution used in the analysis, so that at any indicated enrichment score, only sequences with at least that score were considered. Progressing from left to right indicates analysis of increasingly high levels of substitution. The y axis indicates the –log10 P value from the Mann–Whitney nonparametric comparison of means (one-sided) for the excess in vector-treated cohort compared to control cohort. The analysis was carried out for each of the 12 base substitutions. The horizontal red line indicates the threshold for achieving statistical significance at P values ≤0.05 (above is significant). (c) Scatter plot showing the proportions of sequences with enrichment scores >1.3 (P values <0.05) of A–G transitions for each mouse in the HIVBaL group. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus. Molecular Therapy 2010 18, 803-811DOI: (10.1038/mt.2009.316) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Frequency of deletions in HIV-1 challenge viruses grown in the presence of vector-treated cells or controls. (a) Illustration of the numbers and locations of deletions in HIVBaL from the vector-treated and control groups corresponding to the 5′-end of amplicon 2. Gray indicates sequence gaps. Deletions of ≥70 bases were plotted. (b) Analysis of the significance of the difference in deletion frequencies between vector-treated and control mice after HIVBaL challenge. The x axis shows the length of deletions included in the analysis, so that at any indicated value only deletions of that length or greater were included in the analysis. The y axis shows the P value for the comparison of means between vector-treated and control groups calculated using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test (one-sided). Each mouse was treated as a single measurement of proportions. (c) As in b, but analysis of the HIVNL4-3 challenge group. (d) Comparison of proportions for deletions ≥70 bases, for the control and vector-treated mice. Each mouse is shown as a point. Molecular Therapy 2010 18, 803-811DOI: (10.1038/mt.2009.316) Copyright © 2010 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions