Application Roadmap September 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employee Engagement.
Advertisements

Aligning Employee Insights with HR Priorities.
Leadership Pulse™ Energy and Age Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report April, 2006 the measure of your success.
CFDLS © 2013 Central Florida Diversity Learning Series 2013 Evaluation Summary of Session 6 on November 5 th Language Competency Presenter: Leslie Aguilar.
Delivery Services All Director’s Meeting Thursday, March 19, 2015 DeForest.
Mtivity Client Support System Quick start guide. Mtivity Client Support System We are very pleased to announce the launch of a new Client Support System.
EFECS MRAM October 11, 2012 Gwen TrenthamMichael Anthony eFECS Project ManagerExecutive Director UW Information Technology Management Accounting & Analysis.
Practical IT Research that Drives Measurable Results Craft a Compensation Strategy March 2012.
Intended for Knowledge Sharing only Optimizing Product Decisions with Insights THE PRODUCT MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION EVENT 2016 Jan 2016.
© 2015 ASPCA ®. All Rights Reserved. Succession Planning & People Development Practical Tools for Managers Cheryl Bucci - Vice President, Human Resources.
© 2016 Results and Analysis: Elementary Schools Only 2016 School Quality Survey Spring ISD January 19 – 31, 2016.
Analyze Wrap Up and Action Items
Build an IT Strategy for the Small Enterprise
What every benchmarking coordinator needs to know
Well Trained International
Continuous Delivery- Complete Guide
Context for the experiment?
SAMPLE Drive Engagement Through Interdepartmental Collaboration
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—State and Local Government September 25, 2013.
Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions
Time and Effort Statements aka Monthly Personnel Activity Reports
SHRM Survey Findings: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—High-Tech Industry September 25, 2013.
2016 Year-End Performance Management
Eventuosity for Event Marketers
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
Please read and then delete this slide
Deal More Effectively with Demand for IT Staff
Improve Business Satisfaction by 10% Through Business Relationship Management Relationship management is the #1 driver of business satisfaction with IT.
Time and Effort Statements aka Monthly Personnel Activity Reports
ASU Budget 2018/19 Presentation by: Liam Schreiter
Disengaged Employees February 2011.
Backup Software Select February 2011
Document DR Plan August 2010
CIS 558Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
CIS 558 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com.
Accountability Court Certification and Peer Review
Items in red require your input
COVER.
Introduction to Survey Design
A Compensation Analysis For Human Resources Professionals
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Employee Satisfaction Surveys Survey Results July 2010
Recruitment Video Storyboard Template
Software Asset Management October 2010
Managing SharePoint February 2011
2018 SMU Staff Performance Review Training
Business Impact Analysis
INTRODUCTION TO THE GRANT CENTER
HFFA Membership Study Results Wave 2
COVER.
Customer Service Knowledge Management September 2011
Kuali Research Organizational Change Management
Build a Culture of Innovation in IT September 2011
Learning Management Systems September 2011
2011 (1st) Annual NWACP Summit
C. Laevaert,B. Le Goff DWG 4th and 5th May-2006
IT Consumerization Strategy September 2011
Management Development Programs
Application Metrics September 2011
2008 Space Grant Regional Meetings Survey Results
FPHS Capacity Assessment: Updates and Reminders
Stable and Efficient IT Department September 2011
Infrastructure Metrics September 2011
IT Service Requisition and Planning October 2010
School-wide Positive Behavior and Intervention Supports (PBIS)
2017 Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) Results
Improve IT/Business Relationship April 2011
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
BPM Strategy June 2012 Info-Tech Research Group.
Making Disaster Recovery Plans Actionable April 2011
Presentation transcript:

Application Roadmap September 2011 Info-Tech Research Group

Introduction Key Insights Survey Question Graphs In appreciation for your participation in this survey, we have created this exclusive summary of results. The data you provided is being leveraged in our research. Thank you for your participation. This document has these three main sections: Key Insights Survey Question Graphs Respondent Demographics If you have any questions or concerns please contact: Scott Koopman Panel Coordinator Info-Tech Research Group E-mail: skoopman@infotech.com Info-Tech Research Group

Survey Question Graphs Respondent Demographics Key Insights Info-Tech Research Group

Put the most amount of your effort into gap analysis Each effort component was significantly correlated with the impact of the application roadmap The effort component that had the largest impact was developing a gap analysis related to your current applications To have the largest impact with your application roadmap you should put the most effort into developing a gap analysis, however, you should also consider putting effort into the other components as well because they are all important factors Gap analysis 35% Business strategies 26% End user feedback 12% Information from vendors 8% Inventory of applications 7% Feedback from business units 6% Feedback from IT managers 6% Relative importance* with the Overall Application Roadmap Impact Source: Info-Tech Research Group, n = 61 *Each bar represents a statistical estimate of the impact each activity has on the overall application roadmap impact relative to each other activity being included in the model. The values for the activities may not add to 100% due to rounding. The impact of the application roadmap score was calculated by taking the average of the following questions: Having a roadmap…: Has had a positive impact on my ability to respond to the business needs. Having a roadmap…: Has increased my ability to retain staff. Having a roadmap…: Has a positive impact in how I deal with the executive team. Having a roadmap…: Has had a positive impact on my ability to manage my budget. Having a roadmap…: Has had a positive impact on my ability to plan changes/get projects done on time. Having a roadmap…: Had a positive impact on my ability to meet objectives. Having a roadmap…: Has increased the stability of our applications. Having a roadmap…: Was worth the effort I put into developing the roadmap. Info-Tech Research Group

The most important people to get involved with the application roadmap are the software developers and end-users To have greater success with your application roadmap success you should include two important contributors The most important contributor to application roadmap success are software developers. The second most important contributors to have involved with you application roadmap are the end-users The other contributors were not as important to application roadmap success, however, should still be included in the development where necessary The application roadmap success was calculated by taking the average of the following questions measured on a 6-point strongly disagree to strongly agree scale: We are very happy with the responsiveness of our applications We have very few patch compliance issues We are very happy with the level of quality directly related to our applications We are very happy with the cost and value we get from our applications We rarely hear end user complaints about current applications We have clearly aligned the cost of our applications with business needs. Most risks associated with legacy applications are solved Most top talent is retained within the applications department 37% Application Roadmap Success Relative Importance to 19% 16% 15% 8% 3% 2% 0% Software DevelopersSoftware Developers End-usersEnd-users CFO CIO CEO Vendors Managers of IT outside of ApplicationsManagers of IT outside of ApplicationsManagers of IT outside of Applications Other C-level officersOther C-level officersOther C-level officers Contributor Source: Info-Tech Research Group, n = 127 Info-Tech Research Group

Survey Question Graphs Respondent Demographics Key Insights Info-Tech Research Group

Survey Question Graphs Respondent Demographics Key Insights Info-Tech Research Group

Like This? Want More? Watch your inbox. Within the coming weeks, Info-Tech will be launching several more short surveys that will offer similar results to these. If you participate, you will receive the results for every project you participated in. To ensure you are included or for more information please email Scott Koopman Info-Tech Research Group