Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Sky W. Brubaker, Denise M. Monack  Immunity 
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Community Behavior and Spatial Regulation within a Bacterial Microcolony in Deep Tissue Sites Serves to Protect against Host Attack  Kimberly M. Davis,
Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 134, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Jamaal L. Benjamin, Rhea Sumpter, Beth Levine, Lora V. Hooper 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
by George M. H. Birchenough, Elisabeth E. L. Nyström, Malin E. V
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 17, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Euiseok J. Kim, Matthew W. Jacobs, Tony Ito-Cole, Edward M. Callaway 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Sky W. Brubaker, Denise M. Monack  Immunity 
CD169+ macrophages play a critical role in mediating innate immune cell reorganization. CD169+ macrophages play a critical role in mediating innate immune.
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 148, Issue 7, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Legionella Reveal Dendritic Cell Functions that Facilitate Selection of Antigens for MHC Class II Presentation  Annie L Neild, Craig R Roy  Immunity 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Intraepithelial lymphocytes
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Distinct Apical and Basolateral Mechanisms Drive Planar Cell Polarity-Dependent Convergent Extension of the Mouse Neural Plate  Margot Williams, Weiwei.
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Intestinal Epithelial Cell Autophagy Is Required to Protect against TNF-Induced Apoptosis during Chronic Colitis in Mice  Johanna Pott, Agnieszka Martyna.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 237-248 (August 2014) Epithelium-Intrinsic NAIP/NLRC4 Inflammasome Drives Infected Enterocyte Expulsion to Restrict Salmonella Replication in the Intestinal Mucosa  Mikael E. Sellin, Anna A. Müller, Boas Felmy, Tamas Dolowschiak, Médéric Diard, Aubry Tardivel, Kendle M. Maslowski, Wolf-Dietrich Hardt  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 237-248 (August 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2014 16, 237-248DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Intraepithelial S.Tm Microcolony Emergence during Early Infection (A–K) C57BL/6 WT mice were sm-pretreated, infected orally with 5 × 107 CFU S.Tm-pssaG-GFP (S.Tm-G+), and killed 6–36 hr p.i. (A and B) Nr of S.Tm-G+ residing in the epithelium (A) and lamina propria (B) of n = 5 mice/time point. (C) Confocal micrographs of cecum tissue S.Tm microcolonies 12 hr p.i.; S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (blue), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). Dashed line indicates enterocyte border. (D) Size distribution of intraepithelial S.Tm invasion foci (n ≥ 400 foci/time point). (E) Confocal micrographs of cecum tissue 12 hr p.i. after S.Tm-pssaG-GFP (G+; green) + S.Tm-pssaG-mCherry (R+; red) coinfection; nuclei (gray), actin (yellow). Arrowheads indicate microcolonies. (F) Quantification of data illustrated in (E). (G) Intravital image of a CMV-β-Actin-DsRed (red) mouse ∼9 hr p.i. with S.Tm-G+ (green); Dashed line indicates crypt borders, arrow heads S.Tm-G+. (H) Intravital image series of S.Tm-G+ (white) microcolony growth. (I–K) Confocal micrographs of enterocytes harboring single S.Tm (I and J) or a microcolony (K); S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (gray), actin (red), LAMP-1 (yellow). Right: magnified channels of boxed regions. Lu., lumen; L.p., lamina propria. Scale bars represent 10 μm. Statistical significance calculated with Mann-Whitney U-test (n.s., not significant; ∗p < 0.05). Cell Host & Microbe 2014 16, 237-248DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Restriction of Intraepithelial S.Tm Load by Expulsion of Infected Enterocytes (A–C) C57BL/6 mice were infected as in Figure 1. (A and B) Nr of S.Tm-G+ residing in lumenal EpCAM+ cells (A) or free in the lumen (B) of n = 5 mice/time point. Dashed red lines indicate corresponding median S.Tm-G+ loads in the mucosal epithelium (from Figure 1A). (C) Frequency of EpCAM+ cells harboring S.Tm-G+ in the mucosa and lumen (example mouse indicated by arrow in A). Ntot > 10000 EpCAM+ cells; statistical significance calculated with Mann-Whitney U-test (∗p < 0.05). Cell Host & Microbe 2014 16, 237-248DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 NAIP-Dependent Restriction of Intraepithelial S.Tm Load (A–J) Naip1-6 fl/Δ and Naip1-6Δ/Δ litter mates (n = 5–9 animals/group) were infected as in Figure 1, and killed 12–36 hr p.i. (A) S.Tm load in lumenal content. (B) Histopathology score. (C) Micrographs of cecum tissue 18 hr p.i.; S.Tm-G+ (green), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). Inserts show magnified GFP channel of boxed regions. (D) Nr of S.Tm-G+ in cecum tissue. Red arrows indicate mice depicted in (G). (E) Confocal micrographs of cecum tissue 18 hr p.i.; S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (gray), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). Arrowheads indicate S.Tm-G+ foci. (F) Micrographs as in (E), but of tissue sectioned perpendicular to the crypt-villus axis. (G) Micrographs of cecum tissue 12 hr p.i.; S.Tm-G+ (green), EpCAM (yellow). Dashed line indicates epithelial brush border and arrowheads S.Tm in EpCAM+ cells. (H) S.Tm-G+ in lumenal versus mucosal EpCAM+ cells at 12 hr p.i. (n = 5 animals/group), expressed as a ratio. (I) Size distribution of intraepithelial S.Tm invasion foci at 18 hr p.i. (n = 429–432 foci per group). (J) S.Tm load in mesenteric lymph nodes. Lu., lumen; Ep., epithelium; L.p., lamina propria. Scale bars represent 20 μm. Statistical significance calculated by Mann-Whitney U-test (n.s., not significant; ∗p < 0.05). Cell Host & Microbe 2014 16, 237-248DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Involvement of the NLRC4 Inflammasome in Restricting Intraepithelial S.Tm Load (A–L) Groups of the indicated knockout mice and +/− (or +/+ mice) littermate controls were infected as in Figure 1 and killed 18 hr p.i. Data are shown for (A–C) Nlrc4−/− (n = 5 animals/group), (D–F) Casp-1/11−/− (n = 8 animals/group), (G–I) IL-1αβ−/− (n = 5–6 animals/group), and (J–L) IL-18−/− (n = 5 animals/group). (A), (D), (G), and (J) show micrographs of cecum tissue 18 hr p.i.: S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (blue, only in A), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). Insets show magnified GFP channel of boxed regions. (B), (E), (H), and (K) show the number of S.Tm-G+ in cecum tissue. Statistical significance was calculated with Mann-Whitney U test (n.s., not significant; ∗p < 0.05). (C), (F), (I), and (L) show confocal micrographs of cecum tissue 18 hr p.i.: S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (gray), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). Arrowheads indicate S.Tm-G+ foci. Lu., Lumen; Ep., Epithelium; L.p., lamina propria. All scale bars represent 20 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2014 16, 237-248DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 NAIP-NLRC4-Dependent Control of the Intraepithelial Replicative Niche (A–E) Groups of the indicated mice were infected as in Figure 1 and killed 18 hr p.i. (A) Confocal micrographs of cecum tissue from Naip1-6Δ/ΔNlrc4−/− double knockout mice and littermate controls; S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (gray), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). Arrowheads indicate S.Tm-G+ foci. Lu., lumen; Ep., epithelium; L.p., lamina propria. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (B) Nr of S.Tm-G+ in cecum tissue of mice in (A) (N; ≥3 distinct locations in three to four mice/group). (C) Size distribution of intraepithelial S.Tm invasion foci in Nlrc4+/− and Nlrc4−/− littermates (n = 432–433 foci/group). Statistical significance calculated with Mann-Whitney U-test (n.s., not significant; ∗p < 0.05). (D and E) Confocal images of Nlrc4−/− enterocytes harboring S.Tm microcolonies; S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (gray), actin (red), and LAMP-1 (yellow). Right: magnified channels of boxed regions. Scale bars represent 10 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2014 16, 237-248DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Evidence for Epithelium-Intrinsic NAIP(s)-NLRC4 (A–G) Groups of the indicated mice were infected as in Figure 1 and killed 18 hr p.i. (A) Micrographs of cecum tissue from the indicated BM chimeric mice; S.Tm-G+ (green), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). (B) Nr of S.Tm-G+ in cecum tissue (n ≥3 distinct locations in three to four mice/group). (C) Confocal micrographs of cecum tissue from mice in (A); S.Tm-G+ (green), nuclei (gray), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). (D) Micrographs of cecum tissue from the indicated epithelial-specific knockout mice or littermate controls; S.Tm-G+ (green), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). (E) Nr of S.Tm-G+ in cecum tissue of mice in (D) (n ≥3 distinct locations in two to five mice/group). (F) Confocal micrographs of cecum tissue from mice in (D); S.Tm-G+, nuclei (gray), actin (red), and ICAM-1 (yellow). In (C) and (F), arrowheads indicate S.Tm-G+ foci. Lu., lumen; Ep., epithelium; L.p., lamina propria. Scale bars represent 20 μm. Statistical significance calculated with Mann-Whitney U-test (n.s., not significant; ∗p < 0.05). (G) Naip1, 2, 5, 6, Nlrc4, and CD45 transcript levels in cecum tissue of the indicated mouse lines, normalized for β-actin. All data are expressed as percent mRNA compared to control (Naip1-6fl/fl); bars represent mean ± SD; n.d., not detectable. Cell Host & Microbe 2014 16, 237-248DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2014.07.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions