Smolt Migration 2006 (preliminary results)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tim Copeland and June Johnson Idaho Department of Fish & Game Idaho Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project
Advertisements

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Investigate the Life History of Spring Chinook Salmon and Summer Steelhead in the Grande Ronde River Basin Project Brian Jonasson Oregon Department.
A Study to Evaluate Delayed (Extra) Mortality Associated with Passage of Yearling Chinook Salmon Smolts through Snake River Dams Project No
Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
UMATILLA RIVER FISH PASSAGE OPERATIONS
Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.
Examining the Effects of Juvenile Migration Timing on Adult Age of Columbia River Salmon Benjamin P. Sandford Fish Ecology Division Fish Ecology Division.
Passage Behavior and Survival for Radio-tagged Subyearling Chinook Salmon at Ice Harbor Dam, 2006 Fish Ecology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Experiences Handling PTAGIS Data in Comparative Survival Study By Tom Berggren Fish Passage Center Portland OR.
C. A. Peery, M. L. Keefer, and S. R. Lee Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey and Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Update on the status of Snake River Subyearling Chinook Migration Current Year Passage of PIT-tagged Snake Subs LGR PIT Detections LGR Estimated Passage.
Survival Estimation Using Estimated Daily Detection Probabilities Benjamin P. Sandford Fish Ecology Division NOAA Fisheries.
Fecundity Management Strategies. Why Talk About This? As managers, we utilize various methods in managing broodstock collection – we never want to be.
Overview  Modeling to date: –Distribution of mortality –Achieving improvements with specific actions  Building scenarios  Dealing with uncertainty –
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
Combining PIT Tags with Scale Reading to Better Understand the Life History of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Douglas Marsh and William Muir - NOAA Fisheries.
IEAB Cost-effectiveness Evaluation Framework for Fish Tagging: Building a (MIP) Programming Model Bill Jaeger, IEAB & Oregon State University January 7,
Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.
1 Mainstem Passage Strategies In The Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill and Flow Augmentation Presented By: Albert Giorgi, Ph.D.
Hydrosystem Operations and Fish Recovery in the Columbia River Basin U
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection (SMP Traps) Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting Feb. 11,
BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.
Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)
Estimating the Age and Origin of Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam Christian Smith USFWS Abernathy Lab, Longview, WA Jody White Quantitative.
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY Chapter 3: Annual SAR by study category and ratios of SARs Comparisons of SARs Transport to In-River By hatchery group Hatchery.
Juvenile survival, travel time and the in-river environment Presenter: Steve Haeseker CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Annual SARs by Study Category, TIR and D: Patterns and Significance Presenter: Charlie Petrosky CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Smolt Monitoring Program: Overview and Data Collection Brandon R. Chockley SMP Pre-Season Meeting February 20,
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
2015 G AS B UBBLE T RAUMA M ONITORING P ROTOCOL SMP Preseason Meeting – Bypass Facilities February 20, 2015 Brandon R. Chockley 1.
Migration pathway, age at ocean entry, and SARs for Snake River Basin fall Chinook prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
The relationship of Snake River stream-type Chinook survival rates to in-river, ocean and climate conditions Howard Schaller, USFWS * Charlie Petrosky,
Downstream Survival of Juvenile Stream Type Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Through the Snake/Columbia River Hydropower System and Adult Return Rates AFEP.
2005 Preliminary Summer Spill Data Fall Chinook Radiotelemetry Studies Performed by USGS – BRD, NOAA – NWFSC For the USACE Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program.
Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
2005 Subyearling Migration Fish Passage Center. Overview – summer migration Court ordered summer spill occurred from June 20 to August 31, 2005 Question.
Release Strategies to Improve Post-Release Performance of Hatchery Summer Steelhead in Northeast Oregon. Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project. ODFW -Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project EPA – Estuarine Habitat.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
Parr and smolt yield, migration timing, and age structure in a wild steelhead population, Fish Creek, Idaho Alan Byrne Idaho Department of Fish and Game.
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
COLUMBIA BASIN KELTS: ABUNDANCE, DOWNSTREAM PASSAGE, AND REPEAT SPAWNING.
2016 Smolt Monitoring Program Juvenile Passage Data and
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
Hatchery Subyearling Survival Lower Granite to McNary Dam 1998 to 2007 (preliminary results) Fish Passage Center.
Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
Comparative Survival Study Project #
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Steelhead status in Idaho – 2012 Update
2017 TMT Year-end Review December 12, 2017 Brandon R. Chockley
Fall Chinook Management Measures
Direct Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers: Update with 2007 Results Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Steelhead stock status in Idaho 2008 update
Effects of Water Temperature (Year), Sex and Domestication On In-river Migration and Survival of Adult Upper Yakima River Spring Chinook C. Knudsen,
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
Steelhead status in Idaho 2010 update
NOAA Mainstem PIT Tag Research
Behavior and Survival for Juvenile Salmonids Passing Ice Harbor Dam during reduced and BiOp spill treatments, Gordon Axel, Eric Hockersmith, and.
Presentation transcript:

Smolt Migration 2006 (preliminary results) Fish Passage Center

Review of 2006 Smolt Migration Run Size Timing Spread-the-risk delayed transport Subyearling survival & summer spill

Yearling Chinook Population Index at Lower Granite and Hatchery Releases

Combined H&W Steelhead Population at Lower Granite and Hatchery Releases

Timing of Spring Migrants at Lower Granite

Wild PIT-tagged Yearling Chinook Timing at LGR and wild run at large

Wild PIT-tag Steelhead Timing at Lower Granite and Combined run at large

Run at Large ST & CH 10Yr Avg Timing at LGR

Estimated Collection Efficiency Summary of 2006 Transport Species Proportion Passing During Transport Estimated Collection Efficiency of Pop transport P(T) LGR LGS LMN MCN Wild Steelhead 0.87a 0.37 0.66 0.61 na 0.79 Hatchery Steelhead 0.35 0.62 0.53 0.76 Wild Sp/Su Chinook 0.68 0.32 0.58 0.5 Hatch Sp/Su Chinook 0.86 0.24 0.42 Wild fall Chinook (subs) ~1 0.16 0.3 0.12 0.21 0.48 Hatch fall Chinook (subs) 1 0.18 0.17 P(T) = [CElgr + CElgs*(1-CElgr) + CElmn*(1-CElgs)(1-CElgr)]*Prop(Pop)

Other ways to measure transport proportion Species Prop Pop Passing During Transport Prop(Pop) Overall Prob of transport P(T) Prob of transpt (Destin-ed) P(t) Prob of passing uncollected P(Unc) In-River Prop Below LMN P(InRiv) In-Trans Prop Below LMN P(Tran) InRiver Prop Bypassed P(Byp) (pct of InRiv) Wild Steelhead 0.87a 0.79 0.92 0.08 0.17 0.77 0.12(69%) Hatchery Steelhead 0.76 0.88 0.12 0.20 0.74 0.11(58%) Wild Sp/Su Chinook 0.68 0.58 0.86 0.14 0.36 0.55 0.27(77%) Hatch Sp/Su Chinook 0.61 0.71 0.29 0.28 0.51 0.10(36%) Wild fall Chinook (s) NA(1) 0.48 0.52 0.33 0.41 Hatch fall Chinook (s) 1 0.53 0.47 0.35 0.46 P(T) = P(t)* Prop(Pop) P(t) = CElgr + CElgs*(1-CElgr) + CElmn*(1-CElgs)(1-CElgr) P(Unc) = (1-CElgr)(1-CElgs)(1-CElmn) P(InRiv) = Prop(Pop)*[P(Unc)*Slgs*Slmn] + (1-Prop(pop))*Slgs*Slmn P(Tran) = Prop(Pop)*[CElgr + CElgs*(1-CElgr)* Slgs + CElmn*(1-CElgs)(1-CElgr)*Slgs*Slmn] P(Byp) = CElgr + CElgs*(1-CElgr) + CElmn*(1-CElgs)(1-CElgr) (*1- Prop(Pop))

Hatchery/Supplementation Releases of Subyearling Chinook above LGR

Subyearling Chinook Timing at LGR

Survival for Production Subyearling Chinook LGR to McN 1998 to 2006 with 95% CI’s

Weighted Regression example

AH Subyearling Chinook Survival vs Avg Spill Pct LGS, LMN, IHR, McN

AH Subyearling Chinook Survival vs sum WTT LGS, LMN, IHR, McN

AH Subyearling Chinook Survival vs Avg Temp LGS, LMN, IHR, McN