Air Traffic Control the Netherlands

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASAS Thematic Network – Rome April 2003 Session 2-B Cost / Implications ASAS Impact on Ground Systems An Industry Viewpoint Thales ATM Peter.
Advertisements

Work load and responsibilit y npor. Ing. Miroslava Šimonová.
Air Traffic Management
SC227 – SC214 ISRA – Datalink Interface. PBN Manual, Part A, Chapter On-board performance monitoring and alerting On-board performance.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory RWSL OpEval PilotTraining, page 1 Aug 2006 MPK Pilot Training for Continued Operational Evaluation of Runway Status Lights (RWSL)
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
Applications from packages I to III
Vincent Chu and Peter Hwoschinsky, FAA Maria Picardi Kuffner, MIT/LL
Air Traffic Control System Team #3. Introduction The purpose of air-traffic control is to assure safe separation between en-route aircraft and the safe.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Will we ever automate the tasks of the ATCO? Job Brüggen Safety Manager LVNL Will we ever automate the tasks of the ATCO? Ir. Job Brüggen.
1 July 18, 2011 Runway 19 Dalton Departure Procedure Flight Crews requesting the Dalton 19 Departure MUST possess the chart and adhere strictly to the.
Brussels December 5,20021 New Technologies and Airport Management Presented by Cesare Bernabei Università di Piacenza & Politecnico di Milano January.
Computerised Air Traffic Management Tools - Benefits and Limitations OMAR BASHIR (March 2005)
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
ASAS-TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, MalmöSlide 1 Airborne Surveillance Applications included in ‘Package I’ Francis Casaux CARE/ASAS manager.
CRISTAL ITP European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CRISTAL ITP ASAS-TN, Paris Johan Martensson CASCADE CRISTAL ITPJohan Martensson ASAS-TN.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR3/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG WP2 Current situation analysis – Aircraft perspective Philippe Louyot (CENA)
2 nd ASAS-TN2 Workshop - Rome, 4 th April 20061/13 Civil-Military cooperation as a key factor in ASAS implementation Italian Air Force (IAF) Ltc. Maurizio.
Air Transport Association of Canada Safety Advisory Committee Larry Lachance Assistant Vice President, Operational Support November 7, 2010.
Mr. Lagomarsino Money Power with Technology Applications.
Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety For Corporate Pilot’s Corporate Seminar August 8, 2009 Back to Basics For Runway Safety.
Second ATM R&D projects Co-ordination and networking meeting 14 Nov 2007 Advanced Remote Tower - ART A concept study of Enhanced functionalities during.
Roger Lane EUROCONTROL Airport R&D Unit Safety Forum
Flight Operations.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
FAA Flight Standards AFS-220/430 FPAW 2017 Summer
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Safety Nets: Primary or Secondary Defenses? Does it Matter?
C.F.I.T. © Global Air Training Limited 2010.
Unit-3 FLIGHT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Airports, Airspace, & Radio Communication
Unit-3 FLIGHT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Airport Components Engr. Muhammad Hussain.
C-2 Departs Runway CRM CASE STUDY.
Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Miami International Airport Runway Incursion Action Team Recommendations for Incursion Mitigation Presented to: ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM Runway Safety/Runway.
Malta Language Proficiency Requirements Implementation
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
FAA Flight Standards AFS-430 Fall FPAW 2016
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
Runway Safety Nets James Fee Manager | Runway Safety Group
Ground System implication for ASAS implementation
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
CORSAIR Project Status Updates
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
Protecting your landing against overruns
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
FAA and JPDO ASAS Activities
Air Traffic Control Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 2.
Pilot considerations and pilot solutions
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
Miami International Airport Runway Incursion Action Team Recommendations for Incursion Mitigation Presented to: ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM Runway Safety/Runway.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
DOES THE ATC HAVE A ROLE IN THE WILDLIFE STRIKE PREVENTION ?
How Air Traffic is Coordinated
AIRPORT VOCABULARY ATC: air traffic control
Air Traffic Control System
ATC Clearances Chapter 3 Section C.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Presentation transcript:

Air Traffic Control the Netherlands GARDS A Go-Around Detection System implemented at Schiphol Airport Mariska Roerdink Project manager GARDS & Senior Performance Expert Air Traffic Control the Netherlands / Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland

air traffic controller In case of a go-around… What happens between air traffic controller and flight crew?

Flight crew initiates go-around and informs ATC Procedure vs. practice ATCo instructs go-around Flight crew initiates go-around and informs ATC Flight crew initiates go-around, does not (immediately) inform ATC, ATC detects go-around Flight crew initiates go-around, does not (immediately) inform ATC, ATC does not detect go-around

Schiphol Airport runway layout Dependent runway use

A possible incident

Continuous safety improvement Human Training Safety awareness Procedure Restrict use of dependent runways Timing procedures Machine Increase detection probability GARDS: Go-ARound Detection System

GARDS: automatic go-around detection Surveillance Runway visual detection pilot report YES ALERT Landing Aircraft? YES Non-nominal landing parameters? Altitude / position High speed

GARDS operational concept Safety net Cannot be switched off by ATCo System use No GARDS inputs required No change in working method Conditions All runways & combinations All visibility conditions Traffic IFR approaches only Alerting Visual Auditory

Human Machine Interface Visual alert Presented on ground situation and air surveillance display. Auditory alert Generated at working position of the involved runway controller

Technical approach

System tuning: find the balance False alerts Timing of alerting

Performance validation Analysis based on: More than five years of radar data More than 1 million arrivals More than 2000 go-arounds False alerts 0,01 % Timing of alerting 7 (late GA) – 15 seconds (early GA) Go live!

Implementation Live at Schiphol control towers since May 2015 Operational evaluation in 2015 Minor update in November 2015

Facts & figures After go-live: More than 215.000 arrivals All go-arounds detected 10 false alerts Some solved by november 2015 update

False alerts explained Glidepath deviation Temporary loss of multilateration coverage High speed after landing Circling approaches – no false alert!

Lessons learned – Development Continuous involvement of controller community Safety net part of complete package of measures Safety net complementary to existing practice Intuitive system Consistent use over runways and conditions Easy to explain system design

Lessons learned – In practice Positive acceptance of GARDS Off-line tuning ensures successful go-live Evaluation in practice for minor updates Ground safety net introduces air-ground awareness

More information? Mariska Roerdink Project manager GARDS This project was sponsored by the Knowledge & Development Centre Mainport Schiphol Mariska Roerdink Project manager GARDS Air Traffic Control the Netherlands / Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland  m.roerdink@lvnl.nl  +31 20 406 2947