NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Advertisements

PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Consider this… “Effective leaders see what is essential and ignore the rest…focus on what is vital and eliminate all of the extraneous distractions…stop.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
As you arrive... Log in to ovecisln.wikispaces.com Log in to ovecisln.wikispaces.com ISLN participants!
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21 st Century Ready Administrators Unpacking Teacher Professional Responsibilities Standards.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21 st Century Ready Teachers Unpacking Teacher Professional Responsibilities Standards.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21 st Century Ready Teachers Unpacking High-Leverage Instructional Standards.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
Colorado Department of Education Katy Anthes March 2014 Educator Effectiveness & Teacher Librarians.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Building a P-3 System Page P. Meyer – Director, Early Learning Alice Humphres – Coordinator, Early Learning.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Eastern’s Assessment System
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Pike County Schools Implementing PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Focus on the Students Sherri Heise, Director of Instruction Tonia.
Superintendent’s Goals
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Targeted District Review Report
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Subject line: Teacher Evaluation Feedback Form - Deanery ____
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Five Required Elements
Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting November, 2013
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Deer Valley USD Work Team November 15, 2017
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
State Board of Education Progress Update
Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning
Introduction Introduction
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
New Prospect Elementary School
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Presentation transcript:

NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready Administrators Unpacking Administrator Professional Responsibilities Standards

NEPF Administrators Teachers High-leverage Instructional Leadership Standards Professional Responsibilities Standards Student Outcomes High-leverage Instructional Standards Professional Responsibilities Standards

2013-14 Implementation Validation Schools: Pilot NEPF WestEd Observations and Surveys: March 2014 Study of NEPF components - data collection on processes and instruments Identify infrastructure needed for successful implementation and scaling up of NEPF

Full NEPF system 2014-15 Implementation 100% of NV educators – all schools Legislative Interim Finance Committee determines if consequences in place or delayed

Getting Started: Shift in Educational Practices NEPF PHASE-IN Getting Started: Shift in Educational Practices

AGENDA Nevada Educator Performance Framework Identifying Sources of Evidence Planning for Action – Next Steps

Identifying the Evidence What is evidence and how do we use it meaningfully?

Lesson 3: Identifying the Evidence Types of Evidence Direct observation of administrator practice occurs when the evaluator is physically present in the school or venue where the administrator is present and leading. These observations include but are not limited to leadership team meetings, administrators observing teacher practice, or administrator to teacher feedback conversations. Indirect observation of administrator practice occurs when the evaluator is observing or reviewing systems or processes that have been developed and implemented by the administrator but operate without the administrator present. These indirect observations include but are not limited to attending teacher team meetings or collaboration sessions (where the administrator is not present) or observing teacher practice across multiple classrooms. Lesson 3: Identifying the Evidence 34

Lesson 3: Identifying the Evidence Types of Evidence Artifacts documenting administrator practice include but are not limited to the strategic school plan, documentation of the school’s instructional framework, and communications to families and community members. School data are concrete results of a administrator’s work, including but not limited to direct evidence of student performance and stakeholder feedback. Lesson 3: Identifying the Evidence 34

Specifically, in each of the following areas: Focus on learning Your Turn List sources of evidence an evaluator could use to review the practices of an effective administrator. Specifically, in each of the following areas: Focus on learning Continuous Improvement Productive Relationships Structures 8

Turn and Talk What similarities did you have with your partner? If there were differences, what were they? As you discuss with your partner, refine the evidence listed. 38

augment the examples of evidence using the four evidence categories. Your Turn Review examples of evidence in the Nevada NEPF Teacher High Leverage Instructional Standards Rubric, and in pairs, augment the examples of evidence using the four evidence categories. When you are finished, be prepared to share with the whole group. 8

Turn and Talk Looking at the list of evidence you have generated, what do you think the best ways are to use it meaningfully for growth and accountability? 43

Your Turn If you are a supervisor of administrators: •What evidence do you currently collect to determine administrator effectiveness? •What evidence could you collect to determine administrator effectiveness? •How can you organize the evidence so that it can be used meaningfully for growth and accountability? 8

Your Turn If you are an administrator: •What evidence do you currently collect to demonstrate administrator effectiveness? •What evidence could you collect to demonstrate administrator effectiveness? •How can you organize the evidence so that it can be used meaningfully for growth and accountability? 8

Next Steps: Plan for Action

http://rpdp.net/NEPF.html For More Information For Teacher Instruction Modules and Videos – see http://www.cse.ucla.edu/nevada-professional-development/index.htm user: Nevada pass: nevinstruct