Dynamics of Blood-Borne CD8 Memory T Cell Migration In Vivo

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Advertisements

Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Following the Development of a CD4 T Cell Response In Vivo
Feedback Regulation of Pathogen-Specific T Cell Priming
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Accelerated Migration of Respiratory Dendritic Cells to the Regional Lymph Nodes Is Limited to the Early Phase of Pulmonary Infection  Kevin L Legge,
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Viral Infection Results in Massive CD8+ T Cell Expansion and Mortality in Vaccinated Perforin-Deficient Mice  Vladimir P Badovinac, Sara E Hamilton, John.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Lung Airway-Surveilling CXCR3hi Memory CD8+ T Cells Are Critical for Protection against Influenza A Virus  Bram Slütter, Lecia L. Pewe, Susan M. Kaech,
Accelerated Migration of Respiratory Dendritic Cells to the Regional Lymph Nodes Is Limited to the Early Phase of Pulmonary Infection  Kevin L Legge,
Inflammatory Monocytes Activate Memory CD8+ T and Innate NK Lymphocytes Independent of Cognate Antigen during Microbial Pathogen Invasion  Saïdi M'Homa.
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
NKT Cells Inhibit the Onset of Diabetes by Impairing the Development of Pathogenic T Cells Specific for Pancreatic β Cells  Lucie Beaudoin, Véronique.
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Protective Capacity of Memory CD8+ T Cells Is Dictated by Antigen Exposure History and Nature of the Infection  Jeffrey C. Nolz, John T. Harty  Immunity 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
In Situ Activation and Expansion of Host Tregs: A New Approach to Enhance Donor Chimerism and Stable Engraftment in Major Histocompatibility Complex-Matched.
Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Controls the Formation and Maintenance of Gut-Resident Memory T Cells by Regulating Migration and Retention  Nu.
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Saskia Hemmers, Alexander Y. Rudensky  Cell Reports 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
An Interleukin-21- Interleukin-10-STAT3 Pathway Is Critical for Functional Maturation of Memory CD8+ T Cells  Weiguo Cui, Ying Liu, Jason S. Weinstein,
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Karima R.R. Siddiqui, Sophie Laffont, Fiona Powrie  Immunity 
Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Michael J. Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Courtney R. Plumlee, Brian S. Sheridan, Basak B. Cicek, Leo Lefrançois 
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Hepatic Interleukin-7 Expression Regulates T Cell Responses
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (February 2015)
Immunization with IR or F/T elicits activated OT-I cells of distinct phenotypes. Immunization with IR or F/T elicits activated OT-I cells of distinct phenotypes.
Presentation transcript:

Dynamics of Blood-Borne CD8 Memory T Cell Migration In Vivo Kimberly D Klonowski, Kristina J Williams, Amanda L Marzo, David A Blair, Elizabeth G Lingenheld, Leo Lefrançois  Immunity  Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 551-562 (May 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7

Figure 1 Memory CD8 T Cell Migration into the LN and the PC Is Ptx Sensitive Enriched CD8+ splenocytes from VSV-immune (A) or LM-immune (B) mice were treated with 20 ng/mL Ptx (gray bar) or media alone (open bar) and injected iv into CD45 congenic recipients. Each bar represents the average percentage ± SEM of tetramer+ donor CD8+ T cells migrating into the specified tissue of three mice 3 days after adoptive transfer. ND, not detectable; *, statistically significant (p < 0.05). Immunity 2004 20, 551-562DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7)

Figure 2 Kinetics of CD8 T Cell Trafficking after Parabiosis (A) VSV-immune C57BL/6 Ly5.1 mice were joined to uninfected C57BL/6 Ly5.2 mice. At various time points, the percentage of Ly5.1+ and Ly5.2+ CD8 T cells in each parabiont was assessed by flow cytometry. Migration kinetics are depicted for CD8 T cells in the spleen, LN, lung, liver, and BM ([A], upper left), brain and PC ([A], upper right), LP ([A], lower left), or for the CD8 αβ IEL compartment ([A], lower right). In the panels analyzing the kinetics of CD8 T cell chimerism in the pairs, each line represents the ratio of host to donor CD8 T cells in a given tissue. The dotted horizontal line represents a 1:1 host to donor ratio. (B) LM-immune C57BL/6 Ly5.1 mice were parabiosed to naive C57BL/6 Ly5.2 mice. The kinetics of CD8 T cell migration prior to equilibrium in the blood, lung, and liver are represented in the left panel. Early trafficking of Ag-specific memory cells between the lungs of the parabionts is depicted in the right panel. The endogenous population reflects the Ag-specific population found in the infected mouse, whereas the migrated memory cells are those isolated from the uninfected mouse. Immunity 2004 20, 551-562DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7)

Figure 3 Delayed Kinetics and Limited Entry of CD8 Memory T Cells into the Brain and Intestinal LP Eight and fifteen days after parabiosis of VSV-IND-infected C57BL/6 Ly5.1 and Ly5.2 mice, lymphocytes were harvested from the spleen, lung, BM, LP, brain, and PC of either parabiont. Cells isolated from the conjoined mice were analyzed for CD8, Ly5.1, and Ly5.2 expression and tetramer reactivity by flow cytometry. The percentage of tetramer+ CD8 T cells among the total donor population is indicated in the upper left hand quadrant, and the number in parentheses reflects the percentage of tetramer+ cells within the donor CD8 T cell subset. Values represent the mean of ten mice for all tissues except the brain, which represents two pooled samples from five mice each. Standard errors for each tissue were all <20% of the mean. Immunity 2004 20, 551-562DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7)

Figure 4 Disparate Distribution of Memory CD8 T Cells between Nonlymphoid Tissues VSV-immune C57BL/6 Ly5.1 and Ly5.2 mice were parabiosed, and 15 days later the total number ± SEM of tetramer+ cells was determined. The Ly5.1 and Ly5.2 congenic markers were used to differentiate between the endogenous population (i.e., Ly5.1+ cells in a Ly5.1+ mouse) and migrants (i.e., Ly5.1+ cells in a Ly5.2+ mouse and vice versa). The values represent the mean number of tetramer+ memory cells in a given tissue from ten mice (except the brain, where two pools of five samples each were analyzed). “*,” statistically significant (p < 0.05). Immunity 2004 20, 551-562DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7)

Figure 5 β7 Integrins Are Required for CD8 Memory Cell Homing to the PP and LP OT-I (Ly5.1/5.2) and OT-I-β7−/− (Ly5.1) cells mixed in a 1:1 ratio were injected into C57BL/6 Ly5.2 mice. More than 30 days after VSV-ova infection, the mice were joined to naive C57BL/6 Ly5.2 mice. After 27 days, the ratio of OTI:OTI/β7−/− donor cells recovered in the naive mice was determined. The dotted horizontal line represents a 1:1 OTI to OTI/β7−/− ratio. Values represent the mean ± SEM of eight mice (except for the PP, where two pools of four mice each were analyzed). The LP was significantly different from all tissues analyzed (*p < 0.05), except the PP. Statistical analysis was unable to be performed on the PP because of limited sample size. Immunity 2004 20, 551-562DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7)

Figure 6 CD69 Is Upregulated on CD8 T Cells Migrating into the Intestinal Mucosa Lymphocytes from the IEL, LP, and spleen of both parabionts 15 days (top row) and 35 days (bottom row) after surgery were analyzed for CD69 expression by flow cytometry. Gray histograms in the LP and IEL panels represent endogenous CD8 lymphocytes while the open histograms depict CD8 T cell migrants as assessed by differential Ly5 expression. The gray numbers in the LP and IEL plots are the percentage of endogenous CD8 T cells that are CD69+, while those in black are the percentage of CD69+ CD8 migrants. Immigrating CD8 T cells in the spleen (far right column) express little CD69, similar to the majority of CD8 T cells recovered from all nonintestinal tissues examined (data not shown). Immunity 2004 20, 551-562DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7)

Figure 7 Migrating Blood-Borne CD8 Memory Cells Retain Functional Activity (A) Lymphocytes from the lung and spleen of both the memory donor and naive recipient were stimulated in vitro for 5 hr with the ova-derived SIINFEKL peptide in the presence of anti-LAMP 1 and 2 mAbs (CD107a and b) and Brefeldin A, 19 days after the joining of LM-ova immune mice to naive partners. Samples were then stained for intracellular IFNγ, CD8, and either Ly5.1 or Ly5.2, and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The value in the upper right quadrant is the percentage of donor CD8 T cells that express both LAMP 1 and 2 and intracellular IFNγ. (B) Gating on naive recipient CD8 cells in either partner results in neither IFNγ production or LAMP 1 and 2 expression after 5 hr stimulation with SIINFEKL. (C) Percentage of ova-specific CD8 T cells in the mice represented in (A). The values in the upper right quadrant represent the percentage of total donor lymphocytes that are tetramer+ while the values in parentheses are the percentage of CD8 T cells that are tetramer+. (D) Lymphocytes from the lung and spleen of both parabionts were isolated and stimulated in vitro with LLO(189–203)-derived peptide for 5 hr in the presence of Brefeldin A 10 days after surgery. Cells were analyzed for expression of CD4, CD44, Ly5.1 or Ly5.2, and intracellular IFNγ. Plots are of gated CD4+ T cells. The values in the upper right quadrant represent the percentage of donor CD4 memory cells expressing IFNγ. Immunity 2004 20, 551-562DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00103-7)