Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages (August 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future directions in HIV basic science research The hunt for a cure.
Advertisements

Future directions in HIV basic science research The hunt for a cure.
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Epitope targeting and viral inoculum are determinants of Nef-mediated immune evasion of HIV-1 from cytotoxic T lymphocytes by Diana Y. Chen, Arumugam Balamurugan,
Blood T-cell receptor diversity decreases during the course of HIV infection, but the potential for a diverse repertoire persists by Paul D. Baum, Jennifer.
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Pathways Responsible for Human Autoantibody and Therapeutic Intravenous IgG Activity in Humanized Mice  Inessa Schwab, Anja Lux, Falk Nimmerjahn  Cell.
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 158, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Quantitative analysis of the latent reservoir during treatment interruption. Quantitative analysis of the latent reservoir during treatment interruption.
Jacob Andrade, Shundi Ge, Goar Symbatyan, Michael S. Rosol, Arthur J
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 165, Issue 7, Pages (June 2016)
Early CMV Viremia Is Associated with Impaired Viral Control following Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with a Total Lymphoid Irradiation.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Jacob Andrade, Shundi Ge, Goar Symbatyan, Michael S. Rosol, Arthur J
Effect of First-Line Treatment on Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells’ Subpopulations in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
HIV-1 Integration Landscape during Latent and Active Infection
Alterations in the Gut Microbiota Associated with HIV-1 Infection
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Lior Cohen, Gideon Rothschild, Adi Mizrahi  Neuron 
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing
T Cell–Mediated Rejection of Human CD34+ Cells Is Prevented by Costimulatory Blockade in a Xenograft Model  Annie L. Oh, Dolores Mahmud, Benedetta Nicolini,
B-1a and B-1b Cells Exhibit Distinct Developmental Requirements and Have Unique Functional Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity to S. pneumoniae  Karen.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Protective Immunity Transferred by Infusion of Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD8+ T Cells within Donor Grafts: Its Associations with Cytomegalovirus Reactivation.
Fluorescent In Vivo Detection Reveals that IgE+ B Cells Are Restrained by an Intrinsic Cell Fate Predisposition  Zhiyong Yang, Brandon M. Sullivan, Christopher D.C.
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
AID Is Required for c-myc/IgH Chromosome Translocations In Vivo
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Kevin G. Haworth, Christina Ironside, Zachary K. Norgaard, Willimark M
Alex Sigal, David Baltimore  Cell Host & Microbe 
Katelyn T. Byrne, Robert H. Vonderheide  Cell Reports 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
An Interleukin-21- Interleukin-10-STAT3 Pathway Is Critical for Functional Maturation of Memory CD8+ T Cells  Weiguo Cui, Ying Liu, Jason S. Weinstein,
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
CD8+ T Cells and cART: A Dynamic Duo?
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e7 (November 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Katelyn T. Byrne, Robert H. Vonderheide  Cell Reports 
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Protective Regulatory T Cell Generation in Autoimmune Diabetes by DNA Covaccination with Islet Antigens and a Selective CTLA-4 Ligand  Yelena Glinka,
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 170, Issue 4, Pages e10 (August 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Fig. 2 Dynamics of Nef-stop repair and predictors of viral set-point.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages 989-999 (August 2014) Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies and Viral Inducers Decrease Rebound from HIV-1 Latent Reservoirs in Humanized Mice  Ariel Halper-Stromberg, Ching-Lan Lu, Florian Klein, Joshua A. Horwitz, Stylianos Bournazos, Lilian Nogueira, Thomas R. Eisenreich, Cassie Liu, Anna Gazumyan, Uwe Schaefer, Rebecca C. Furze, Michael S. Seaman, Rab Prinjha, Alexander Tarakhovsky, Jeffrey V. Ravetch, Michel C. Nussenzweig  Cell  Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages 989-999 (August 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Postexposure Prophylaxis with bNAbs (A) Schematic timeline for the bNAb (top) and ART (bottom) experiments. (B) Plasma viremia for untreated mice. The x axis is days post HIV-1 challenge. The y axis is viral RNA copies/ml. Gray shading indicates values beneath the detection limit of 800 copies/ml. The blue line indicates the geometric mean of plasma viremia. (C) Plasma viremia for ART-treated mice. Graph as in (B). The blue shading indicates the treatment period with ART. (D) Plasma viremia for antibody-treated mice. The red arrows indicate antibody tri-mix injections. The dashed red line shows average plasma antibody concentration (μg/ml) for all mice in the group. (E) Graph as in (D) for mice treated with antibody starting 8 days after HIV-1 challenge. (F) The proportion of mice that were aviremic at the terminal point for each treatment group (∗p < 0.05; Fisher’s exact test). (G) Percentage of CD4+ T cells in the spleen at the terminal point measured by flow cytometry, organized by treatment group. A, aviremic; V, viremic. (H) Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA measured in spleen T cells at the terminal point, plotted as the ratio of HIV-1 RNA to CCR5 copies for each mouse. Gray shading indicates the detection limit of 1.25 × 10−5 copies per cell. (I) Cell-associated HIV-1 DNA measured in spleen T cells at the terminal point, plotted as the ratio of HIV-1 DNA to CCR5 copies for each mouse. Gray shading indicates the detection limit of 2.0 × 10−5 copies per cell. Mice that died prematurely are not included in Figures 1G–1I. See also Figures S1, S2, and Data S1. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 FcRnull Antibodies Suppress Viremia but Do Not Prevent Rebound (A) Plasma viremia as in Figure 1D for mice treated with FcRnull tri-mix. (B) For all viremic mice, plasma antibody concentration (μg/ml) on the day of viral rebound. Antibody levels were significantly higher in FcRnull tri-mix-treated mice compared to wild-type tri-mix-treated mice (∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test). (C) Sequences of gp120 cloned from plasma. Horizontal lines denote individual clones, grouped by mouse, shown on the right. Red ticks and green ticks indicate nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions relative to gp120YU2, respectively. Blue shading highlights sites of mutations that confer escape to the antibody tri-mix. See also Data S2. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Rebound Viremia after Therapy with Single Inducers (A) Schematic timeline of the experiment. (B–D) Graphs show plasma viremia for individual mice on the left y axis and geometric mean antibody level (μg/ml) on the right y axis among all mice in the group (red). The x axis represents days relative to the first antibody injection. Antibody injections are indicated with red arrows. Mice that had rebound plasma viremia are shown in gray. Mice that failed to rebound are shown in black. (B) Mice that received tri-mix antibodies but no inducers. (C) Mice that received tri-mix antibodies and vorinostat (green arrows). (D) Mice that received tri-mix antibodies and I-BET151 (purple shading). (E) Mice that received tri-mix antibodies and CTLA (orange arrows). See also Data S3 and Figures S3 and S5. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Combination Inducers Decrease the Incidence of Rebound Viremia (A) Mice treated with tri-mix of antibodies and a combination of three inducers. Graph, arrows, and shading are as in Figure 3. (B) Graph shows the proportion of mice that showed rebound viremia for each treatment group, where all mice that received antibody tri-mix and any one of the three single inducers (shown in Figures 3C–3E) are pooled together (∗p < 0.05; Fisher’s exact test). See also Data S4 and Figures S3, S4, and S5. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Antibody Persistence and Premature Termination Do Not Account for Nonrebounding (A) Percentage of CD4+ T cells at the terminal point measured in the spleen by flow cytometry, organized by treatment group and rebound status (N.R., nonrebounder; Reb., viral rebounder). (B) Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA measured in spleen cells at terminal point, plotted as the ratio of HIV-1 RNA to CCR5 DNA copies for each mouse. Mice that had measureable HIV-1 RNA but undetectable CCR5 DNA are plotted as 104 copies per cell. (C) Plasma viremia before therapy was initiated for each mouse. There was no significant difference for any individual group (Kruskal-Wallis test). (D) The plasma antibody level (μg/ml) at the time of viral rebound for each mouse that rebounded, organized by treatment group. The mean plasma antibody level at the time of rebound was 2.97 μg/ml for all groups. (E) For each mouse that rebounded, the number of days that elapsed from when the antibody level dropped below 2.97 μg/ml to the time of rebound. (F) For mice that did not rebound, the number of days that elapsed from when each mouse’s antibody levels dropped below 2.97 μg/ml to the terminal point. (G) Cell-associated HIV-1 DNA measured in spleen T cells at the terminal point, plotted as the ratio of HIV-1 DNA to CCR5 copies for each mouse. Mice that had measureable HIV-1 DNA but undetectable CCR5 DNA are plotted as 104 copies per cell. Mice that died prematurely are not included in Figures 5A, 5B, and 5G. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Delayed Viral Rebound in Antibody-Treated Mice, Related to Figure 1 Percentage of mice that become viremic over the course of the experiment shown in Figures 1C-D (p = 0.014, Log-rank test). Blue arrow indicates when ART was stopped. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Correlation between % Human CD4+ T Cells and Absolute Numbers of CD4+ T Cells, Related to Figure 1 Scatterplot of the % human CD4+ T cells among human CD45+ T cells (x axis) versus the absolute count of CD4+ T cells (y axis) within the spleen, measured by flow cytometry (p < 0.0001, Pearson correlation). Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Cell-Associated HIV-1 RNA for Mice with Suppressed Plasma Viremia, Related to Figures 1, 3, and 4 (A) Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA for mice with undetectable plasma viremia in post-exposure prophylaxis experiments. The measurements are from mice shown in Figures 1B-1D at time points 31 and 45 days post-infection. The detection limit is shown with gray shading. (B) Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA for mice with undetectable plasma viremia in viral inducers experiments. The measurements are from mice shown in Figures 3B and 4A at time points 0-21 days prior to inducers administration or vehicle control. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Sustained Viremia in Inducers Treated Mice without Therapy, related to Figure 4 (A) Graphs shown as in Figure 4A. The blue line indicates the geometric mean viremia across all mice. (B) Proportion of human CD45+ leukocytes in peripheral blood, measured by flow cytometry. The difference between the final proportion and starting proportion was not statistically significant between the two groups (Mann-Whitney test). (C) Percentage of CD4+ T cells in the peripheral blood measured by flow cytometry. The difference between the final percentage and starting percentage was not statistically significant between the two groups (Mann-Whitney test). (D) Number of human CD45+ cells per million CD45+ cells (mouse or human CD45+) isolated from the spleen, measured by flow cytometry. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Comparison of Rebound Frequency for Mice Treated with Antibody Alone, Antibody plus Single Inducers, and Antibody plus Combination Inducers, Related to Figures 3 and 4 (A) Quantification of rebound frequency within each treatment group shown in Figures 3B-3E and 4A. (B) p-values of Fisher’s Exact Tests comparing each group to the Antibody + Combination Inducers Group. Cell 2014 158, 989-999DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.043) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions