Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e3 (November 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Advertisements

Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
A Sensorimotor Role for Traveling Waves in Primate Visual Cortex
Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4
Jean-Michel Mongeau, Mark A. Frye  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
A Sparse Object Coding Scheme in Area V4
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
Soumya Chatterjee, Edward M. Callaway  Neuron 
Ji Dai, Daniel I. Brooks, David L. Sheinberg  Current Biology 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2002)
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Sexual Dimorphism in the Hoverfly Motion Vision Pathway
Ian M. Finn, Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
Goal-Related Activity in V4 during Free Viewing Visual Search
Spatiotemporal Response Properties of Optic-Flow Processing Neurons
Selective Attention in an Insect Visual Neuron
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Retinal Representation of the Elementary Visual Signal
Michael L. Morgan, Gregory C. DeAngelis, Dora E. Angelaki  Neuron 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Hongbo Yu, Brandon J. Farley, Dezhe Z. Jin, Mriganka Sur  Neuron 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Tom Baden, Federico Esposti, Anton Nikolaev, Leon Lagnado 
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
Adaptation Disrupts Motion Integration in the Primate Dorsal Stream
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
Eye Movements Modulate Visual Receptive Fields of V4 Neurons
Neural Correlates of Reaching Decisions in Dorsal Premotor Cortex: Specification of Multiple Direction Choices and Final Selection of Action  Paul Cisek,
Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Coding of Natural Scenes in Primary Visual Cortex
Origin and Function of Tuning Diversity in Macaque Visual Cortex
Prediction of Orientation Selectivity from Receptive Field Architecture in Simple Cells of Cat Visual Cortex  Ilan Lampl, Jeffrey S. Anderson, Deda C.
A Scalable Population Code for Time in the Striatum
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Greg Schwartz, Sam Taylor, Clark Fisher, Rob Harris, Michael J. Berry 
Receptive-Field Modification in Rat Visual Cortex Induced by Paired Visual Stimulation and Single-Cell Spiking  C. Daniel Meliza, Yang Dan  Neuron  Volume.
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
Stephen V. David, Benjamin Y. Hayden, James A. Mazer, Jack L. Gallant 
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Representation of Color Stimuli in Awake Macaque Primary Visual Cortex
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Prefrontal Neurons Coding Suppression of Specific Saccades
Local Origin of Field Potentials in Visual Cortex
Tuning to Natural Stimulus Dynamics in Primary Auditory Cortex
Colin J. Akerman, Darragh Smyth, Ian D. Thompson  Neuron 
John B Reppas, W.Martin Usrey, R.Clay Reid  Neuron 
Lysann Wagener, Maria Loconsole, Helen M. Ditz, Andreas Nieder 
The Postsaccadic Unreliability of Gain Fields Renders It Unlikely that the Motor System Can Use Them to Calculate Target Position in Space  Benjamin Y.
Tom Baden, Federico Esposti, Anton Nikolaev, Leon Lagnado 
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Valerio Mante, Vincent Bonin, Matteo Carandini  Neuron 
Visual Motion Induces a Forward Prediction of Spatial Pattern
Jacqueline R. Hembrook-Short, Vanessa L. Mock, Farran Briggs 
A Temporal Channel for Information in Sparse Sensory Coding
Dynamics of Orientation Selectivity in the Primary Visual Cortex and the Importance of Cortical Inhibition  Robert Shapley, Michael Hawken, Dario L. Ringach 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages 3225-3236.e3 (November 2017) Spike Burst Coding of Translatory Optic Flow and Depth from Motion in the Fly Visual System  Kit D. Longden, Martina Wicklein, Ben J. Hardcastle, Stephen J. Huston, Holger G. Krapp  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages 3225-3236.e3 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.044 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 VT1 Encodes the Optic Flow of Forward Sideslip Translation and Fires Spike Bursts (A) The local motion receptive field of the VT1 cell. The direction of each arrow indicates the local preferred direction at that location. The length of the arrow is the square root of the motion sensitivity; this scaling ensures the directions of all responses are visible. Black arrows are mean values, and gray arrows are interpolated values. The map is formed from recordings of N = 10 cells throughout the visual field, and an additional N = 9 cells in the ipsilateral ventral quadrant. (B) Normalized integrals of the dot products between the local motion receptive field and the best-fitting rotation and translation optic flow fields in the ipsilateral visual field (see Method Details). Individual cells are shown in gray, the mean values are in black, and error bars denote SE (N = 10). For all 10 cells, the best fit to translation is greater than the best fit to rotation (p < 0.001, N = 10, paired t test). Values shown are for fits over the ipsilateral field. Data of the fits over the whole visual field are shown in Figure S1C. (C) Example of a recorded voltage trace. The insets give an expanded view of, from left to right: a 3 spike burst, a 2 spike burst, a 4 spike burst, and a single spike. (D) The interspike interval distribution of data from VT1 cells recorded and analyzed for the study (N = 108). The spikes in the spike bursts typically have intervals of 2–3 ms. We used a threshold of 5 ms on the interspike interval to identify spike bursts, indicated by the vertical dashed line. Mean ± SE shown. The distribution is calculated by binning the log10 ISI (see Method Details). (E) The distribution of the number of spikes per burst (N = 108). Across all recordings, around half the spikes are single spikes. Error bars denote SE. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 3225-3236.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.044) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Spike Bursting in VT1 Supports Size Tuning and Is Triggered by the Onset of Motion (A) Responses to the motion of a grating with a spatial wavelength of 15°, moving at 4 cycles/s in the preferred direction inside a circular aperture whose diameter varied between trials. The total response peaks at 24°, due the 3+ spike burst rate peaking at 24°. Mean ± SE responses to the stimulus are shown, N = 11. (B) Raster plot of trials from a single cell (B1) and mean peristimulus spike histograms of all cells (N = 11), in response to the grating moving in a 24°-diameter aperture. The grating stimulus appears between 0.5 and 1.0 s in the trial, indicated by the gray line beneath the raster plots. 3+ spike bursts reliably indicate the onset of motion, and follow the phase of the grating. (C) As for (B) but with a stimulus aperture of 48°. 3+ spike bursts still reliably signal the onset of motion, but no longer follow the phase of the grating. (D) Spatial wavelength tuning of responses to a grating moving at 2, 4, or 7 cycles/s. For the gratings moving at 4 and 7 cycles/s, the peak in the mean spike rate response at 15° is due to the spike burst rate peaking at this spatial wavelength (data not shown). Mean ± SE shown, N = 10. Current Biology 2017 27, 3225-3236.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.044) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 VT1 Spike Bursts Encode Motion Temporal Frequency, and Temporal Frequency Tuning Depends on Area Stimulated (A) Random motion and spike- and spike burst-triggered averages. (A1) The grating moved vertically, with a temporal frequency randomly updated every frame displayed and taken from the interval ±25 cycles/s. (A2) The average stimuli that triggered single spikes and spike bursts. The envelopes around the lines denote SE. The peak velocities of the triggered averages increase with the number of spikes in the burst (N = 10). (A3) Examples of a single spike, a 2 spike burst, and the stimuli applied. Top and lower traces show the neural recording trace and the varying temporal frequency used for stimulation. The scale bars indicate the magnitude and timing of the recording and stimulus, respectively. The gray rectangles indicate a 100-ms time interval preceding the spike bursts. (B) Temporal frequency tuning to a 10° grating moving in the preferred direction in a 48°-diameter aperture. (B1) Spatial location of the stimulus. (B2) Mean ± SE responses to the stimulus, N = 10. (B3) Mean peristimulus time histogram of responses to the grating moving at 7 cycles/s. The time course of the stimulus is indicated by the gray line at the top. (C) As for (B) for motion in a 24°-diameter aperture. (D) As for (B) for motion in the annular space surrounding the 24°-diameter center, inside a 48°-diameter aperture. Current Biology 2017 27, 3225-3236.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.044) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 VT1 Spike Bursts Encode Relative Motion (A) The spatial organization of the stimulus, with the local motion sensitivity and preferred directions plotted in gray. The cell is excited by local vertical motion throughout the area. (B) The joint 3+ spike burst response distribution to gratings moving with independent temporal frequencies in the stimulus center and surround. The temporal frequency axes have been scaled by the square root so that changes in response magnitude at low values can be appraised. The peak 3+ spike burst responses occur when the center temporal frequency is 0 or 25 cycles/s. (C) Responses to 7 cycles/s motion in the stimulus surround, the dashed lines in (B) and (E). Motion in the center inhibits 3+ spike bursting, for all but the slowest (0 cycles/s) and fastest (25 cycles/s) temporal frequencies but does not affect the rate of single spike and 2 spike bursts. Mean ± SE shown, N = 10. (D) 3+ spike bursts have increased directional selectivity, compared to single spikes and 2 spike bursts. The directional tuning curves have been normalized by subtracting the spontaneous spike rate and dividing by the resulting peak rate. Mean ± SE shown, N = 6. (E) As for (B) but calculated for single spikes and 2 spike bursts. The distribution is dominated by the surround temporal frequency, and motion in the center does not inhibit the rate of single spikes and 2 spike bursts. (F) Responses to 2 cycles/s motion in the stimulus center, the dotted lines in (B) and (C). Motion in the surround augments the rate of single spikes and 2 spike bursts but does not affect 3+ spike bursts. Mean ± SE shown, N = 10. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2017 27, 3225-3236.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.044) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 VT1 Spike Bursts Are Modulated by Multiple Depth Planes (A) Spatial organization of the stimuli for the electrophysiological recordings. (B) In every frame, the same stimulus y axis pixel values were displayed across the screen. The space-time plots show how those y axis pixel values changed over the duration of the trial, for the stimuli with the high-contrast background pattern. The stimuli in (B) are aligned by columns to match the panels in (D). All stimuli are organized so that the object begins to leave the monitor screen at 3 s. (C) A schematic alternative view of the situation simulated by the stimuli in (B). The object, the single period λ of a square wave grating, sits above (–ve heights) or below the ground (+ve heights). The fly moves at a velocity of 2λ/s, and the ground has a high-contrast sinusoidal grating of wavelength λ. (D) Mean single spike and 3+ spike burst responses to the object at heights of, from left to right, λ/2 above the ground, level with the ground, or λ below the ground. The 3+ spike burst rate is modulated by the object height, while the single spike rate is unaffected. N = 10. The gray boxes along the x axis highlight the times over which the mean responses are averaged in (G) and (H). (E) As for (C) but with a gray, zero-contrast ground. The motion of the object is now the only motion cue. N = 11. (F) Mean single spike and 3+ spike burst responses to the same object motion in (D), but with the object moving against a gray ground. (G) The mean ± SE responses for the second before the object starts to leave the monitor screen (2–3 s) and the 0.5 s after this time (3–3.5 s), while it moves against the high-contrast background. The 3+ spike burst rate is highly modulated by the object depth. N = 10. (H) As for (G), but for the object moving over the gray ground. The spike burst rate is no longer highly modulated by the object depth, and follows the single spike rate. N = 11. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2017 27, 3225-3236.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.044) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 VT Cells with Motion Receptive Fields Matched to Lift (A–C) The local motion receptive fields of the VT2 (A), VT3 (B), and Hu (C) cell types, respectively. The data are displayed following the same procedures as in Figure 1A. (D) Normalized integrals of the dot products between the local motion receptive field and the best-fitting rotation and translation optic flow fields in the entire visual field (see Method Details). Individual cells are shown in gray, the mean values are in black, and error bars denote SE: VT2 N = 3; VT3, N = 5; Hu, N = 8. (E) The azimuth and elevations of the axes of translations that best match the local motion receptive fields of the VT1–3 and Hu cells. Solid markers indicate mean values, and the green and red bars indicate the mean fitted azimuths of the translation axes of the Hu and VT1 cells, respectively. Current Biology 2017 27, 3225-3236.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.044) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions