Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Improved Structures of Full-Length p97, an AAA ATPase: Implications for Mechanisms of Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Change  Jason M. Davies, Axel.
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Crystal Structure of the TAO2 Kinase Domain
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Crystal Structure of Entamoeba histolytica Cdc45 Suggests a Conformational Switch that May Regulate DNA Replication  Fredy Kurniawan, Ke Shi, Kayo Kurahashi,
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Architecture of a Dodecameric Bacterial Replicative Helicase
Kevin D. Corbett, James M. Berger  Structure 
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 211-222 (February 2009) Insights into the Architecture of the Replicative Helicase from the Structure of an Archaeal MCM Homolog  Brian Bae, Yi-Hsing Chen, Alessandro Costa, Silvia Onesti, Joseph S. Brunzelle, Yuyen Lin, Isaac K.O. Cann, Satish K. Nair  Structure  Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 211-222 (February 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.11.010 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Multiple Sequence Alignments of Archaeal and Eukaryotic MCM Structure-based multiple sequence alignment of Methanopyrus kandleri MCM2 (GenBank accession code 20094556), Methanopyrus kandleri MCM1 (20094401), Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus str. Delta H MCM (15679758), Sulfolobus solfataricus MCM (6015702), Homo sapiens MCM4 (33469919), and MCM2 (33356547). Strictly conserved, highly conserved, and semiconserved residues are colored in magenta, yellow, and cyan, respectively. Secondary structure elements are derived from the structure of MkaMCM2, and dashed lines represent disordered regions. Sequence motifs that are characteristic of MCM proteins are denoted below the aligned sequences. Residues that are deleted in the MkaMCM2 sequence or have not been modeled in the structure are drawn as thin line. Secondary-structure elements within the amino-terminal domain are named based on the notation of Fletcher et al., 2003. Structure 2009 17, 211-222DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.11.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of the Full-Length M. kandleri MCM2 Monomer (A) Ribbon diagram of the overall structure of full-length MkaMCM2 illustrating the structural domains. The amino-terminal helical domain (light blue), OB fold domain (pink), and the carboxy-terminal AAA+ ATPase module (red) are shown, with the two β-hairpins of the AAA+ module highlighted in yellow and green. The PS1BH and H2 insert define a distinct clade of AAA+ domains that include the MCM proteins. Note that the secondary structure elements are numbered for consistency with the structure of the MthMCM amino-terminal domain. The nonsequential numbering of the strands in the OB-fold domain reflects the fact that the zinc-binding extension is deleted in the sequence of MkaMCM2. (B) Close-up view of the β-hairpins that are thought to respond to DNA binding and nucleotide hydrolysis. Note that the H2 insert is positioned adjacent to β strands β4 and β7 in the OB-fold domain. These strands form the base of the zinc-binding module (domain B) found in MthMCM. Interaction between these β strands of the OB fold and the PS1BH and H2 insertions provides a mean of cross-talk between the catalytic AAA+ module and the amino-terminal domain. The position of a highly conserved tryptophan residue (Trp-363 in MkaMCM2) that has been shown to respond to ATPase and helicase activities (Jenkinson and Chong, 2006) is situated in the H2 β-hairpin insert. Structure 2009 17, 211-222DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.11.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cryo-EM Density Map of the MCM Hexamer (A and C) Surface rendering of the cryo-EM density map (displayed at 2σ) viewed from the top and the side, respectively. The side view clearly shows the lateral holes, which are disrupted by an isthmus of electron density. (B and D) Fitting of the AAA+ domain from MkaMCM2 (red) and the N-terminal domain from MthMCM (green, Fletcher et al., 2003). The AAA+ domain of MkaMCM2 matches well the dome-shaped electron density. (E) A view showing the fitting of two hybrid monomers (including the N-terminal domain of MthMCM and the AAA+ domain of MkaMCM2). The N-terminal domain of one subunit (highlighted in green) communicates with the AAA+ domain of the next-neighboring subunit (in red) through the interaction between the PS1BH of the AAA+ domain (shown in yellow) and the β7-β8 loop of the N-terminal domain of an adjacent subunit (in orange) consistent with biochemical studies on MthMCM (Sakakibara et al., 2008). (F) A close up of the same interaction. Structure 2009 17, 211-222DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.11.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Unique Trans-Acting Residues Characterize the MCM AAA+ Domain (A) Model of the MCM hexamer derived as per Figure 3B showing the location of the composite active site formed between two AAA+ domains (colored in blue and red). (B) A close up view of the composite active site showing residues that have been demonstrated to be critical for ATP hydrolysis. The composite active site in MCM has unique features that distinguish the AAA+ modules of these proteins from classical AAA+ ATPases such as DnaA. (C) Within the active site of DnaA (Erzberger et al., 2006), the Walker A and B motifs, sensor I and sensor II helix, are situated in one molecule as cis-acting elements, but the critical arginine finger is a trans-acting residue that is contributed from a neighboring subunit. (D) In contrast, the sensor II helix in MCM functions in trans and is contributed by a neighboring subunit. (E–H) This arrangement of trans-acting elements is similar to that found in viral superfamily III helicases, such as the papillomavirus E1 helicase (Enemark and Joshua-Tor, 2006) (E). An additional trans-site has been identified by biochemical analysis of SsoMCM (Moreau et al., 2007) and consists of a motif containing a highly conserved acidic residue at the base of PS1BH. Comparison of the structure of the SV40 large T antigen bound to (F) ATP and (G) ADP demonstrates that this acidic residue orients the arginine finger in response to the nature of the nucleotide (Gai et al., 2004). Likewise, a similar, highly conserved acidic residue is located as a trans-element in MCM (H) where it might similarly affect intersubunit association in response to nucleotide hydrolysis. Structure 2009 17, 211-222DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.11.010) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions