Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages (November 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Mesoderm-Forming Gene brachyury Regulates Ectoderm-Endoderm Demarcation in the Coral Acropora digitifera  Yuuri Yasuoka, Chuya Shinzato, Noriyuki.
Advertisements

Determination of Endothelial Stalk versus Tip Cell Potential during Angiogenesis by H2.0-like Homeobox-1  Shane P. Herbert, Julia Y.M. Cheung, Didier Y.R.
Raquel V. Mendes, Gabriel G. Martins, Ana M. Cristovão, Leonor Saúde 
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Christina D. Cota, Brad Davidson  Developmental Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Mosaic and regulative development: two faces of one coin
Martin Gering, Roger Patient  Developmental Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
A Feedback Mechanism Controlling SCRAMBLED Receptor Accumulation and Cell- Type Pattern in Arabidopsis  Su-Hwan Kwak, John Schiefelbein  Current Biology 
Mihaela Žigman, Le A. Trinh, Scott E. Fraser, Cecilia B. Moens 
IFT88 Plays a Cilia- and PCP-Independent Role in Controlling Oriented Cell Divisions during Vertebrate Embryonic Development  Antonia Borovina, Brian.
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Yvonne Stahl, René H. Wink, Gwyneth C. Ingram, Rüdiger Simon 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Molecular Analysis of Stem Cells and Their Descendants during Cell Turnover and Regeneration in the Planarian Schmidtea mediterranea  George T. Eisenhoffer,
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Naoyuki Fuse, Kanako Hisata, Alisa L. Katzen, Fumio Matsuzaki 
BMP Signaling Protects Telencephalic Fate by Repressing Eye Identity and Its Cxcr4- Dependent Morphogenesis  Holger Bielen, Corinne Houart  Developmental.
Luis Alberto Baena-López, Antonio Baonza, Antonio García-Bellido 
Neuropeptides: Developmental Signals in Placode Progenitor Formation
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Christian Schröter, Andrew C. Oates  Current Biology 
A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish
Nadine Peyriéras, Uwe Strähle, Frédéric Rosa  Current Biology 
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
Jen-Yi Lee, Richard M. Harland  Current Biology 
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Naohito Takatori, Gaku Kumano, Hidetoshi Saiga, Hiroki Nishida 
Mosaic and regulative development: two faces of one coin
Volume 19, Issue 24, Pages (December 2009)
Stat3 Controls Cell Movements during Zebrafish Gastrulation
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Di Jiang, Edwin M. Munro, William C. Smith  Current Biology 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
Distinct mechanisms regulate slow-muscle development
Jeffrey D Amack, H.Joseph Yost  Current Biology 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Localized PEM mRNA and Protein Are Involved in Cleavage-Plane Orientation and Unequal Cell Divisions in Ascidians  Takefumi Negishi, Tatsuki Takada, Narudo.
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Temporally Regulated Asymmetric Neurogenesis Causes Left-Right Difference in the Zebrafish Habenular Structures  Hidenori Aizawa, Midori Goto, Tomomi.
Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Variation in the Dorsal Gradient Distribution Is a Source for Modified Scaling of Germ Layers in Drosophila  Juan Sebastian Chahda, Rui Sousa-Neves, Claudia Mieko.
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Wnt Signalling: Refocusing on Strabismus
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Axis Formation: Squint Comes into Focus
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 15, Pages (August 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages 1966-1972 (November 2010) Stereotypical Cell Division Orientation Controls Neural Rod Midline Formation in Zebrafish  Elena Quesada-Hernández, Luca Caneparo, Sylvia Schneider, Sylke Winkler, Michael Liebling, Scott E. Fraser, Carl-Philipp Heisenberg  Current Biology  Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages 1966-1972 (November 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.009 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2010 20, 1966-1972DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MZfz7a/b Double Mutants Exhibit Reduced CE Movements and Reduced Stereotypical Germ-Layer Progenitor Cell Division Orientation (A and G) Differential interference contrast (DIC) images of a wild-type (A) and MZfz7a/b (G) embryo at bud stage (10 hpf). Arrowheads demarcate body axis. (B, C, H, and I) Expression pattern of no tail (ntl), hatching gland gene 1(hgg1), and distal-less homeobox gene 3 (dlx3) marking the notochord, prechordal plate, and anterior neural plate, respectively, in a wild-type (B and C) and a MZfz7a/b (H and I) embryo at bud stage. Animal (B and H) and dorsal (C and I) views. (D–F and J–L) Frequency distribution of pairs of division-orientation angles (θ, φ) in wild-type (D–F) and MZfz7a/b (J–L) embryos during gastrulation (6–10 hpf). Chi-square test on the combined angles: wild-type versus MZfz7a/b (p < 0.05). (D and J) Distribution frequency of pairs of division-orientation angles in wild-type (D) and MZfz7a/b (J). (E and K) Distribution of azimuthal angles (θ) in wild-type (E) and MZfz7a/b (K). (F and L) Distribution of elevation angles (φ) in wild-type (F) and MZfz7a/b (L). (M) Schematic dorsal view of a zebrafish embryo at the early gastrula stage. The dotted line demarcates the shield. Pairs of daughter cells are shown as wired gray spheres. The reference coordinate system used to calculate the angles of the cell divisions is indicated by the red (antero-posterior), green (dorso-ventral), and blue (left-right) axes. (N) Picture of the dorsal side of a wild-type embryo at 60% epiboly. Two daughter cells resulting from one representative division are marked by red spheres. The same coordinate system as in (M) is used. The scale bar represents 40 μm. (O) Schematic diagram showing the azimuthal (θ) and the elevation (φ) angles for a single cell division represented by wired gray spheres and red nuclei. The embryonic axes are shown in respect to the reference system. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Table S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 1966-1972DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Stereotypical Germ-Layer Progenitor Cell Division Orientation Is Not Required for Body-Axis Elongation during Gastrulation (A–D) Body-axis elongation (A) and ntl and hgg1 expression in wild-type (B), emi1 (C), and wild-type embryos treated with cell-division inhibitors (D) at bud stage (10 hpf). (E–H) Body-axis elongation (E) and ntl and hgg1 in wild-type (F), MZfz7a/b embryos treated with DMSO (G) and MZfz7a/b embryos treated with cell-division inhibitors (H) at bud stage (10 hpf). (I–K) Frequency distribution of pairs of division-orientation angles (θ,φ) in DynIC-Ab-injected embryos during gastrulation (6–10 hpf). Distribution of azimuthal (θ) (J) and elevation (φ) angles (K). Chi-square test on the combined angles: wild-type versus DynIC-Ab (p < 0.005). (L–N) Body-axis elongation (L) and ntl and hgg1 expression in wild-type (M) and DynIC-injected embryos (N) at bud stage (10 hpf). Error bars show the standard deviation. See also Figure S3 and Table S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 1966-1972DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Wnt/PCP Signaling Controls Stereotypical Neural Progenitor Cell Division Orientation (A–C) Frequency distribution of pairs of division-orientation angles (θ,φ) (A) in axial regions (∼40 μm wide) of the forming neural rod in wild-type embryos during neurulation (13–16 hpf). (D–F) Frequency distribution of pairs of division-orientation angles (θ, φ) in the axial regions of the forming neural rod in MZfz7a/b embryos during neurulation (13–16 hpf). Chi-square test on the combined angles: wild-type versus MZfz7a/b (p < 0.005). (G–I) Frequency distribution of pairs of division-orientation angles (θ, φ) in the axial region of the forming neural rod in DynIC-Ab-injected embryos during neurulation (13–16 hpf). Chi-square test on the combined angles: wild-type versus DynIC-Ab (p < 0.005). (J–L) Frequency distribution of pairs of division-orientation angles (θ, φ) in the axial region of the forming neural rod in tri mutants during neurulation (13–16 hpf). Chi-square test on the combined angles: wild-type versus tri (p = 0.215). Distribution of azimuthal (θ) (B,E,H, and K) and elevation (φ) angles (C,F,I, and L). See also Figure S4 and Table S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 1966-1972DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Stereotypical Neural Progenitor Cell Division Orientation Is Required for Neural Rod Midline Formation during Neurulation (A–F′) Micrographs of F-actin distribution in dorsal (A–F) and transversal (A′–F′) confocal sections of Rhodamine-Phalloidin-stained neural rods in wild-type (A and A′), wild-type treated with cell-division inhibitors (B and B′), MZfz7a/b mutants (C and C′), MZfz7a/b mutants treated with cell-division inhibitors (D and D′), DynIC-Ab-injected embryos (E and E′), and DynIC-Ab-injected embryos treated with cell-division inhibitors (F and F′) at the 16-somite-stage (15 hpf). OV = otic vesicle; dashed lines in (A–F) demarcate the place of the transversal sections in (A′–F′). Scale bars represent 20 μm. (G) Quantification of neural rod midline formation in wild-type embryos, wild-type embryos treated with cell-division inhibitors, emi1 embryos, MZfz7a/b mutants, MZfz7a/b mutants treated with cell-division inhibitors, DynIC-Ab-injected embryos, and DynIC-Ab-injected embryos treated with cell-division inhibitors. (H) Number of cell divisions in axial and paraxial regions of wild-type, MZfz7a/b, DynIC-Ab injected, and tri embryos during neurulation (13–16 hpf) (I) Schematic representations of the neural rod (transverse section), summarizing the effects on neural progenitor cell division localization and orientation and on neural rod midline formation in the different experimental conditions analyzed in this study. See also Table S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 1966-1972DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.009) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions