MFRC Governance C MPC LGen Lamarre

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

Foundation Trust Status for UHL Foundation Trust Project Director.
1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
School Councils 101 Fall School Council Orientation Forum YRDSB 2009.
Governor Introductions How long since your appointment? What type of governor and school? How many meetings attended so far? What do you hope to get out.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
SEN and Disability Green Paper Pathfinders March 2012 Update.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Building our Future: Programme Board TOR PURPOSE To be the governing forum for the design & effective delivery of the Building our Future Programme To.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
School/City/Community Work Plan Year 1 Progress Report.
Terminology Standards (TS) Certification Project Overview.
Main Implications of Post 16 Act on further education provision Regional Strategic Body (UHI) given wide ranging responsibilities (in addition to HE responsibilities)
Michael Lubelfeld Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools Deerfield Public Schools, District 109 – Lake County ISAL II Cohort Member
First Things First Grantee Overview.
CULTURALLY AND LINGUISTICALLY APPROPRIATE SERVICES (CLAS)
Preschool for All: Presentation to the Joint City/School District Committee May 4, 2004.
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
Principles of Good Governance
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
Empowerment Zones Partnerships to get communities the schools they want with the results students need.
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Manchester Master Plan Committee (MPC) Planning Framework
CONSULTATION MEETING DELPH PRIMARY SCHOOL 4 MAY 2017
Emergency Resiliency Fund (ERF)
The Ember Learning Trust
Information Resources Strategy: Continuing to Provide the Resources You Need Fall 2016.
CSL Partner Training Catherine Whitworth, MPA Presentation contributors include Christina Cudney & Marrah Gadomski Welcome, Introductions.
Social Housing Foundation
Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative
The Role of Departments in the Implementation of the Government Agenda Concepts and Realities FMI Professional Development Day - June 7, 2016.
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION Oversight Report on the Verification of Qualifications in the Public Service.
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
Active Communities The Scottish Government has defined physical activity as one of the six priorities for Community Planning Partnership (CPP) Single Outcome.
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Human Services Integration Project
NYHQ DSRIP Cultural Competency & Health Literacy Committee Kick-Off Meeting March 2015.
Strategic & Operational Planning:
Professional & Scientific Council Update
ADI Workshop Coping with Growth Johan Vos.
Research for all Sharing good practice in research management
Delaware Assessment Inventory [district presentation]
Warren K. Wray Provost Faculty Senate
Single Adult Homelessness Advisory Group
Engaging the Business Community in Economic Development Planning
Ousseynou Nakoulima, Chantal Naidoo & Louise Brown 7 October 2014
Optimizing MFSP: Performance Measures
Strengthening Resilience M&A : MFSP Funding
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Emergency Resiliency Fund (ERF)
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
ASCEL Conference 10 – 11 November 2017 Janene Cox OBE Commissioner for
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Strategic Boards Toolkit
Welcome to <School Name> School
Ousseynou Nakoulima, Chantal Naidoo & Louise Brown 7 October 2014
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
History (Continued) In May, 2011, Federal Court required that the prison population of California be decreased from 180% of prison capacity to no more.
February 21-22, 2018.
Strategy
Joint PRESENTATION: IPID AND CSPS
Strategic Planning.
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Process & Timeline Fall 2018: DE was awarded strategic planning technical assistance by US DOL Oct 2018 – Apr 2018: weekly planning meetings with US.
National Union Management Consultation Committee - Drug Manufacturing Inspection Transformation May 16, 2017 Regulatory Operations and Regions Branch.
Professor John O’Halloran Deputy President & Registrar
Presentation transcript:

MFRC Governance C MPC LGen Lamarre

Governance Models – 3 options 1. Current MFRC Governance Model (status quo) 2. Partnership MFRC Governance Model 3. Formalized MFRC Governance Model CAF Ombudsman 2013 Report recommended: reassessment of the foundation of the MFRC governance model Governance Working Group appointed by CMPC, as directed by CDS, under the authority of the Terms of Reference dated October 2016 2. The Governance Working Group (Groupe de travail sur la gouvernance): a. conducted an assessment of the current governance structure (concepts de gouvernance) including comprehensive stakeholder consultation (Jan – June 2017); b. considered alternate governance models at Governance Forum September 2017; and c. determined new 2 governance constructs plus status quo for CDS decision 3. Recommended outcome: Support the seamless experience (l'expérience sans faille) of CAF families through a Formalized Model (modèle formalisé) of MFRC governance acknowledging family needs, enabled by responsible and engaged CAF partners

Formalized MFRC Governance Model Defined stewardship and accountability by MFS and CAF leadership in support of MFRC governance and standardization while maintaining the original grassroots community development philosophy to support families Key Characteristics Defined stewardship and accountability by MFS and local CAF leadership, in support of MFRC governance and standardization and SSE initiatives Stakeholder (Intervenants) responsibilities and accountabilities: Families: at the core of this model; The Three partners are what the CAF see as the enablers of Seamless Canada. B/W CO: monitors standardized governance processes, involvement in community, strategic plan implementation, Board /staff recruitment, MFS, as the funder and steward: establishes, mentors and monitors standardized Board operational processes, approves funding allocations based on strategic plan and provides and monitors the implementation of standardized staffing policies and processes; MFRC Board: ensures not-for-profit, provincial / federal incorporation, charitable status of the MFRC; administers fund management from Public, Non-Public and provincial / municipal sources, and other fees; establishes and monitors MFRC strategic direction; is the autonomous employer and manager of MFRC staff. Maintains intent of original grassroots, community development model of support to families while modernizing to offer a seamless Canadian experience

Formalized MFRC Governance Implementation OUTCOMES Synchronized and defined stakeholder responsibilities and accountabilities Established and monitored standardized Board operational processes; strategic planning direction; and funding allocations based on strategic plan Standardized staffing policies and processes MFRCs directly responding to family community Formalized roles and responsibilities clearly defining governance processes, planning and monitoring Formalized and monitored national and local cohesion OPPORTUNITIES Revise MOU with detailed responsibility matrix and compliance requirements Establish nationalized family feedback / advisory capacity Standardize/nationalized program delivery and communication strategies Leverage national fundraising efforts NEXT Steps Formalized MFRC Governance is the right step right now but not the last step Interim approach as the CAF progresses the various SSE initiatives such as CFB Canada Changes to service delivery of support to families may, in the future, necessitate another review of MFRC governance Governance will evolve as families and the CAF evolves You are going to engage in facilitated discussions this weekend on the outcomes and opportunities written here, and I want to talk to you about the next steps. Could be an interim approach