EUROSTAT between demand and supply

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The thorough revision of the Urban Audit project Berthold Feldmann Eurostat
Advertisements

Slide 1 Eurostat Unit B3 – Statistical Information Technology GLC 13 on October 2004 Electronic Data Reporting for European Statistics.
Data Quality – UK activities Iain Macleay Head of Energy Balances, Prices and Publications 27 September 2013.
17 September SME Statistics OECD Workshop SME data and methodologies in the EU - item 5 Paul Feuvrier / Eurostat.
QM Implementation Based on CoP, PDCA, and GSBPM
1 The South African Statistical Quality Assessment Framework (SASQAF) Presentation made at the Conference on Data Quality for International Organisations.
Working Group on Crime Statistics 9 June 2011 Point 3. Commission Activities ( Doc. CR/WG2011/1)
GENERAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF VIETNAM VIETNAM STATISTICS: PROGRESS AND REFORMS.
The ECB Statistical Quality Framework and Quality Assurance Procedures: An assessment in the light of the attempt to harmonise frameworks of international.
CountrySTAT Regional Basic Administrator Training for ECO Member States Friday, October 23, 2015 EVENT Foundations of CountrySTAT E-learning.
© Federal Statistical Office Germany, Division IB, Institute for Research and Development in Federal Statistics Sheet 1 Surveys, administrative data or.
Evidence serving practice: a perspective from WHO Regional Office for Europe Anca Dumitrescu, MD Director, Division of Information, Evidence and Communication.
Why register-based statistics? Eric Schulte Nordholt Statistics Netherlands Division Social and Spatial Statistics Department Support and Development Section.
 Politics & History  Geography  Environmental Management  Modern Languages  British Official Publications *  European Documentation Centre*  Statistics*
1 Statistical business registers as a prerequisite for integrated economic statistics. By Olav Ljones Deputy Director General Statistics Norway
5-May-10 Wolfgang Hauschild, Eurostat – Unit D5: Key indicators for European policies Quality profiles for long-term development indicators European Conference.
Census quality evaluation: Considerations from an international perspective Bernard Baffour and Paolo Valente UNECE Statistical Division Joint UNECE/Eurostat.
13-Jul-07 Harmonisation of Regional and Urban Statistics – a Challenge Dr. Berthold Feldmann Eurostat – the statistical office of the European Union.
Round Table on Time Series Some Remarks Eurostat.
Statistics on the Information Society
Cost analysis of key statistical products
Dual Mode of Data Collection – A New Approach in the Population, Housing and Dwelling Census in Slovakia in 2011 European Conference on Quality in Official.
Sustainable development goals indicators for cities
E-Government Benchmarking: A Regional Experience
NUTS The European Classification of Regions
Urban Audit Dissemination of results
The draft Urban Audit Regulation
Regional Energy Consumption Statistics
Berthold Feldmann Eurostat
A legal framework for Urban Audit – Next steps
Urban Audit II - Organisational set-up -
Data availability – Urban Audit data collection
The Work programme
Working Party on Regional Statistics 1-2 October 2012
6.1 Quality improvement Regional Course on
Eurostat Management Plan 2015 for Regional and Urban statistics
Objectives for Regional and Urban statistics
Workshop on the data collection of occupational data 28 November 2008
Euro-indicators Working Group
The Urban Audit database
Berthold Feldmann Eurostat
Berthold Feldmann Eurostat
Urban Audit II work Experience so far Riitta Koskinen.
Quality Criteria Initial Ideas.
Urban Audit II in the Netherlands State of the Art
Our Work Program – Achievements 2006 and Plans for 2007
Regional Government expenditure statistics
European Regional and Urban Statistics
Methodological Database MARS
Urban Statistics: the next two years
The Current Situation of Urban Statistics
Urban Audit: Organisational Set-up
Working Party on Urban Statistics Luxembourg, 9th-10th December 1999
The Urban Audit for Candidate Countries
The Urban Audit: Current state and plans for 2001
A Regulation for the Urban Audit - a blessing or a curse?
Policy needs for rural development statistics and data analysis
Regional Government Expenditure
The methodological database MARS
Evolution of Urban Audit
The thorough revision of the Urban Audit project
Meeting of the European Directors of Social Statistics
Indicators for EU policy making
The Urban Audit in France
Work Program milestones -
Transformation of the National Statistical System: Experience
Web-based Urban and Regional data dissemination
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2014, Antalya
Data compilation and pre-validation
Geo-enabling the SDG indicators – experiences from the UN Global Geospatial Management and the GEOSTAT 3 project Agenda item 12 Ekkehard PETRI – Eurostat,
Presentation transcript:

EUROSTAT between demand and supply By Berthold Feldmann 25/02/2001

We all know the seven quality features: Clarity Relevance Coherence Completeness Accuracy Timeliness Comparability Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

We should check these against the Urban Audit results Are the total quality criteria fulfilled? Where is improvement necessary? Are the user needs met? Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up Who are the Users? Client Number 1 of Eurostat is the Commission Then: policy makers at European, national and local (city) level For benchmarking (best practice) Environmental issues (sustainability) Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Who are the data suppliers? Normally: national statistical offices for urban statistics: a more complex picture the cities local data networks regional statistical offices Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Back to the 7 quality features Relevance Accuracy Timeliness Clarity Comparability Coherence Completeness Let’s check them for the Urban Audit statistics Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up RELEVANCE Can the Commission and other policy makers make use of the information of the Urban Audit? Do they want other information? Only they can tell….. Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up ACCURACY The data collected in the pilot study has been checked several times, but certainly still contains errors Accuracy is also a function of the data collection organisation! Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up TIMELINESS So far only a one-off data collection, covering 3 years (1981, 1991, 1996) Data freshness needs certainly to be improved Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up CLARITY What do the statistics of the Urban Audit, as they are published on paper or on the web, mean? Website meets a high standard of clarity and accessibility Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up COMPARABILITY Since the data collection of the pilot study was not organised by statisticians, comparability (of the same variable) between cities is far from satisfactory Comparability over time is a challenge (not easy to achieve) Also satisfactory comparability of the spatial definition of cities is not easy Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up COHERENCE Definitions and methodologies of the Urban Audit statistics differ greatly between countries Improvements are mandatory Coherence to other statistics is difficult to achieve (NUTS breakdown) Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up COMPLETENESS Does the user get a complete picture of the latest evolution in European cities? Difficult to achieve Cost - Benefit analysis necessary Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

What is the result of the analysis? Relevance Accuracy Timeliness Clarity Comparability Coherence Completeness unknown needs improvement acceptable good needs strong improvement Helsinki 2001: Urban Audit follow-up

Thanks for listening ! Any Questions ?