Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 1999)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 16- Tetrapod limb development “It is one thing to differentiate the chondrocytes and osteocytes that synthesize the cartilage and bone matrices;
Advertisements

MCDB 4650 Limb Patterning. Which of the following is the most likely candidate for activating the expression of the different Tbx genes in the mesenchyme?
3/24/2009 Development of the Limbs Biology 208. Developmental Biology. Carlson, 4 th ed. Chapter 10.
ANIMAL DEVELOPMENT CH. 47 MECHANISMS OF MORPHOGENESIS AND CELL FATE 1.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings Concept 47.3: The developmental fate of cells depends on their history.
Development of the Tetrapod Limb - Placement on the Axis, Forelimb Vs
Vertebrate Embryonic Patterning 6 Limb Formation.
Chapter 1: Skeletal Morphogenesis and Embryonic Development Yingzi Yang.
The Developmental Fate of Cells Marissa and Katie.
Jeffrey T Wigle, Guillermo Oliver  Cell 
Development of Limbs (4th to 8th Week)
Development system
Epithelio-mesenchymal interactions II. Development of lung and glands
Juan José Sanz-Ezquerro, Cheryll Tickle  Current Biology 
Federica Bertocchini, Claudio D. Stern  Developmental Cell 
Reena Shakya, Tomoko Watanabe, Frank Costantini  Developmental Cell 
Dynamic Expression of Erbb Pathway Members during Early Mammary Gland Morphogenesis  Olivia Wansbury, Heena Panchal, Michelle James, Suzanne Parry, Alan.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Limb development Dr. Nandor Nagy Semmelweis University,
Jeffrey T Wigle, Guillermo Oliver  Cell 
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Retinoids Run Rampant Neuron
Seppo Vainio, Ulrich Müller  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
Mechanisms of Left-Right Asymmetry
The Origin of Vertebrate Gills
Volume 137, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Is the Progress Zone Model a Victim of Progress?
Jan Schlueter, Takashi Mikawa  Cell Reports 
Gene-Regulatory Interactions in Neural Crest Evolution and Development
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (May 2004)
Radhika Atit, Ronald A. Conlon, Lee Niswander  Developmental Cell 
Frank Costantini, Raphael Kopan  Developmental Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Matthew P. Harris, Sean M. Hasso, Mark W.J. Ferguson, John F. Fallon 
Robert G. Kelly, Nigel A. Brown, Margaret E. Buckingham 
Somite Development: Constructing the Vertebrate Body
Axis Development and Early Asymmetry in Mammals
Hedgehog and Patched in Neural Development and Disease
Liver Specification: A New Role for Wnts in Liver Development
Helge Amthor, Bodo Christ, Miguel Weil, Ketan Patel  Current Biology 
Developmental evolution: This side of paradise
Nodal Signaling in Early Vertebrate Embryos
Neuropeptides: Developmental Signals in Placode Progenitor Formation
BMP4 Plays a Key Role in Left–Right Patterning in Chick Embryos by Maintaining Sonic Hedgehog Asymmetry  Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq, Nicole M. Le Douarin 
Anchor Cell Invasion into the Vulval Epithelium in C. elegans
Tbx5 and Tbx4 Are Not Sufficient to Determine Limb-Specific Morphologies but Have Common Roles in Initiating Limb Outgrowth  Carolina Minguillon, Jo Del.
Thomas Andl, Seshamma T. Reddy, Trivikram Gaddapara, Sarah E. Millar 
Pattern formation: Wingless on the move
Molecular Models for Vertebrate Limb Development
Developmental Basis of Phallus Reduction during Bird Evolution
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Xsox17α and -β Mediate Endoderm Formation in Xenopus
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Retinoic Acid Synthesis and Signaling during Early Organogenesis
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Dian-Han Kuo, David A. Weisblat  Current Biology 
Åsa Apelqvist, Ulf Ahlgren, Helena Edlund  Current Biology 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Patterns of Stem Cell Divisions Contribute to Plant Longevity
On the Formation of Digits and Joints during Limb Development
Antagonistic Signaling by Caronte, a Novel Cerberus-Related Gene, Establishes Left– Right Asymmetric Gene Expression  Yuji Yokouchi, Kyle J Vogan, Richard.
Directing Lung Endoderm Differentiation in Pluripotent Stem Cells
The Anterior-Posterior Axis Emerges Respecting the Morphology of the Mouse Embryo that Changes and Aligns with the Uterus before Gastrulation  Daniel.
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 225-233 (January 1999) Morphogenesis  Brigid L.M Hogan  Cell  Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 225-233 (January 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80562-0

Figure 1 Model of Feather Bud Formation and Patterning in Chick Skin (A) Placode formation is initiated by a mesenchymal signal (gray) that induces Shh and Fgf4 expression in the overlying ectoderm (blue). Later, placodes also express Bmp2 and Bmp4 (red), leading to inhibition of placodal fate in the surrounding cells. (B) Hypothetical distribution of signaling proteins based on a reaction diffusion mechanism model of placode development. Both short-range activators (Fgf, Shh) and longer-range inhibitors (Bmps) are produced from the same source. Nearer the center, activators override the inhibitors, and a feather primordium is established and outgrowth initiated. Further from the center, inhibitors predominate and an interbud domain is set up. Delta-1 in the mesenchyme is thought to both promote placode formation in the ectoderm via Notch-1 and to inhibit placode fate laterally, via Notch-2 in the dermis (Crowe et al. 1998; Viallet et al. 1998). Cell 1999 96, 225-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80562-0)

Figure 2 Model for the Role of Fgfs and Shh in Chick Wing Bud Outgrowth Fgf10 (blue) is first expressed in the segmental plate (SP), intermediate mesoderm (IM), and lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) over a broader domain than where bud outgrowth will occur. By stage 14, Fgf10 expression is restricted to the forelimb progenitor field, possibly in part by signals from more medial mesoderm (thin arrows). At stage 16, Fgf10 in the mesoderm directly or indirectly induces Fgf8 expression in the surface ectoderm (SE) of the presumptive apical ectodermal ridge (AER). By stage 17, Fgf8 made in the AER acts on the underlying mesoderm and maintains Fgf10 expression. Shh expressed in the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) functions directly or indirectly (Yang et al. 1997) as a mitogen on the mesenchyme cells and also induces Fgf4 in the adjacent ectoderm and Bmp2 in the adjacent mesoderm (not shown). The posterior AER (by secreting Fgf4) and the dorsal ectoderm (by secreting Wnt7a) maintain the activity of the ZPA. Figure adapted from Ohuchi et al. 1997. This reference should be consulted for more details. Expression of putative inhibitory molecules, for example Bmps and vertebrate homologs of Drosophila Sprouty, are not shown. Recent studies have established that murine sprouty 4 is expressed in the mesenchyme of the progress zone (de Maximy et al. 1999). Cell 1999 96, 225-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80562-0)

Figure 4 Fgf10 Acts as a Chemoattractant for Distal Lung Endoderm in Culture Mesenchyme-free distal endoderm from an E11.5 lung was incubated in Matrigel as described (Bellusci et al. 1997b). A 150 μm diameter heparin bead–soaked in 50 μg/ml Fgf10 (kindly supplied by Dr N. Itoh) was placed 150 μm from the endoderm, which proliferated and physically moved around the bead. Asterisks mark initial endoderm positions (M. Weaver, personal communication). Cell 1999 96, 225-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80562-0)

Figure 3 Branching Morphogenesis of the Mouse Lung (A and B) Morphology of the left (L) and right (R) primary lung buds of an E10.0 mouse embryo by scanning electron microscopy. (A) Ventral view with heart removed. (B) Cross section. In the L bud only the mesenchyme (m) is visible, but in the R bud both the mesenchyme and the distal endoderm (en) surrounded by a basal lamina are revealed. ant, anterior; mes, mesothelium; eos, epithelium of esophagus; tr, trachea. Photographs kindly supplied by Kathy Sulik. (C) Early pattern of secondary buds revealed by whole-mount in situ hybriziation of E11.5 lung with a digoxygenin-labeled antisense riboprobe for Shh. Buds are numbered in the approximate temporal order in which they appear, although 2 and 3 arise almost simultaneously. Scale bars = 50 μm for (A), 100 μm for (B), and 250 μm for (C). Cell 1999 96, 225-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80562-0)

Figure 5 Two Models for Patterning of Bud Sites in the Early Mouse Lung The figure shows schematically the generation of three secondary buds (1, 2, and 3) on the dorsal (D), ventral (V), and lateral sides, respectively, of a hypothetical right primary bud as it grows out along the proximodistal axis (dotted line in A1). Model A predicts that the future domains of Fgf10 expression (dotted blue circles) are “prepatterned” or “hardwired” at the time of primary bud outgrowth (A1). As the lung grows (A2), the domains start to express Fgf10 in a proximal-to-distal sequence but retain their positions relative to the spatial coordinates of the primary bud. Secondary buds, as well as distal tips, express high levels of Bmp4 and Shh, although lower levels of the latter are produced throughout most of the endoderm. Model B predicts that lateral inhibitory mechanisms from the distal tip endoderm of the primary and later secondary buds (red lines) play a major role in determining budding pattern. As the primary bud grows from stage B1 to B2, this lateral inhibition is relieved first in the endoderm region where bud 1 will form, then in the region where bud 2 will arise, etc. As the buds grow out in response to low levels of Fgf10 in the mesoderm, they produce factors that upregulate expression of the gene in the overlying mesoderm and also inhibit other buds in the vicinity. Inhibitory mechanisms also probably work in the mesenchyme to repress bud formation dorsally and ventrally after buds 1 and 2 have formed. Cell 1999 96, 225-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80562-0)

Figure 6 A Leafy Seadragon, Phycodurus eques, from South Australia. For further details see Groves 1998 and http://www.nexus.edu.au/schools/kingscot/pelican/seadragon/sd_001.htm. Cell 1999 96, 225-233DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80562-0)