Explaining the recent changes in agricultural nutrient load in Finland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EIONET water workshop 12 October 2005 Developments in EEA needs in water quantity data Philippe Crouzet AIR/SAG.
Advertisements

MITERRA-EUROPE Assessment of nitrogen flows in agriculture of EU-27
Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Changes of agricultural diffuse nutrient inputs in major European river systems and their contribution.
The World Water Quality Assessment Large-scale water quality modeling Hot spots and causes of water pollution.
Land use effect on nutrient loading – nutrient models new assessment tools Inese Huttunen, Markus Huttunen and Bertel Vehviläinen Finnish Environment Institute.
Nutrients and Ecosystems. Fertilizer Application Rates Lawns: kg N/ha/yr Athletic Fields: kg N/ha/yr Pastures (Dairy): kg N/ha/yr.
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga Susan Colarullo Jeff Fischer
Daily Manure Production Per Animal We have estimates of manure production –4.5 kg/day/hd for swine (liquid manure) –45-50 kg/day/hd for dairy cow (liquid)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Welcome to the USGS Webinar: New Science and Online Management Tools to Help Guide Action on Nutrients.
Water Quality H. Behrendt, M. Grossmann, H. Gömann, U. Mischke, A. Schöll, J. Steidl GLOWA-Elbe GLOWA Status conference 19 May 2005 Cologne Linkages of.
Univ. of Alberta Climate Change Impacts on Canadian Agriculture R.F. Grant Dept. of Renewable Resources, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton,Alberta.
IV. Practice Problem You want to determine the effects of a certain fertilizer on the growth of orchids grown in a greenhouse. Materials that are available.
Dutch manure policy | November 19th, 2013 Dutch manure policy Seminar Portugal Emar Gemmeke Policy Coordinator.
FROM PRAIRIES TO CORN FIELDS FOR FUEL: A TALE OF LOST CARBON
Emission factors for N 2 O and NO from agricultural soils in Belgium Pascal Boeckx, Annick Goossens & Oswald Van Cleemput Ghent University Belgium.
N surplus and handling of WFD in the Netherlands Gerard Velthof.
Using a Coupled Groundwater-Flow and Nitrate-Balance-Regression Model to Explain Trends, Forecast Loads, and Target Future Reclamation Ward Sanford, USGS,
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Potential of Using Precision Agricultural Practices for P Fertilizer Management.
Water Systems Mrs. Bader. Water Systems In this exercise, you will learn more about what makes up a watershed, track the movement of water through the.
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed, Kickoff meeting Twinning on development of modelling capacity to support water quality.
LAKE OHRID MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA Experiences with Nutrient Management and Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control.
Agriculture and its effects in Scotland, Belgium and Iceland
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Emissions of CH4 and N2O from Agriculture in Ireland Michael McGettigan, Environmental Protection Agency.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Rural Economy Research Centre Rural Development Conference Agricultural (Mini) Catchments Programme Cathal Buckley 26 th January 2009.
Monitoring of the Agricultural Run-off in Latvia ( ) Viesturs Jansons Professor, Head of Department of Environmental Engineering and Water Management.
1 Soil NO inventory from large scale farming in France: impact on atmospheric NO2 and O3 concentrations Achieved during 2 national French projects GICC.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Gross nutrient balances: German experiences Volker Appel, BMELV-425 WORKING PARTY "AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT" OF THE STANDING.
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
RiverLife and Implementation of the WFD Satu Maaria Karjalainen North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre PRB Workshop , Ghent.
Regional Gross Nutrient Balances Hungary RISSAC HCSO.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
The European Nitrogen Assessment Regional nitrogen assessments and implications for aquatic systems: European perspective Bruna Grizzetti European Nitrogen.
Workshop on Agricultural Nutrient Reduction,Vilnius September 2004 HELCOM- on the way to nutrient load reduction Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
Lessons learnt from the dairying Accounting for Nutrients project Warwick Dougherty.
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
Monitoring and Assessment of Impact of Nutrient Management Measures Dr. Antanas Sigitas ŠILEIKA Water Management Institute 2004.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
Bayesian SPARROW Model Song Qian Ibrahim Alameddine The University of Toledo American University of Beirut.
Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
The Netherlands: manure policy and request for a derogation to the livestock manure limit of 170 kg N/ha per year for dr. ir. Cindy.
Julian Dawson Northern Rivers Institute
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Why Does Industry Cause Pollution?
USING GIS CROP INFORMATION TO DETERMINE SITE-SPECIFIC MANURE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
Jim McClelland Rae Mooney University of Texas at Austin
Key Issues Where is industry distributed? Why are situation and site factors important? Why does industry cause pollution? Why are situation and site factors.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Possible approach for riverine nutrient loads data
Work on Agriculture and Water Linkages EEA in cooperation with JRC
Calculating regional gross nutrient balances
HELCOM and the Baltic Sea
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Other Topics – Anne Miek Kremer
Presentation transcript:

Explaining the recent changes in agricultural nutrient load in Finland Katri Rankinen, Petri Ekholm, Hannu Rita, Heidi Sjöblom, Ljudmila Vesikko

Research question Is it possible to estimate quantity development 29.4.2019 Petri Ekholm, SYKE Is it possible to estimate quantity development contributing factors of agricultural nutrient load based on national river monitoring data?

Data National monitoring data from 22 rivers 29.4.2019 Petri Ekholm, SYKE National monitoring data from 22 rivers Southern and western Finland ⅓ of agricultural land in Finland Total P, Total N, Flow Years 1985–2006 divided into 4 periods I = 1985–1989 II = 1990–1994 III = 1995–1999, 1st Programme period IV = 2000–2006, 2nd Programme period

”Diffuse-source component” CTN (µg l−1) Approach Step 1: Estimating daily concentrations, C, from flow, Q 29.4.2019 Petri Ekholm, SYKE ”Point- source component” ”Diffuse-source component” ”Basic component” Q (m3 s−1)

Approach Step 2: Riverine nutrient fluxes, L 29.4.2019 Petri Ekholm, SYKE Step 3: Source apportionment Step 4: Explaining spatial differences and temporal changes Step 5: Analysis of development: 1985-2006 flow used for all the periods

Factors related to ”agricultural” P load (LP, kg km−2 y−1) 29.4.2019 LP = 1.6 × Field-% − 3.6, r2 = 0.57 LP = 1.4 × Field-% − 2.2× Lake-% − 9.0, r2 = 0.70 LP = 1.4 × Field-% + 1.7× Lake-% + 92 × Runoff − 22, r2 = 0.73 Increase in LP : soil-test P, r2 = 0.81 Decrease in LP : fallow, r2 = 0.74 No effect on LP : P in manure Regional analysis Southern Finland: Grassland appears to decrease LP Western Finland: Grassland increases LP Petri Ekholm, SYKE

Regional differences Southern Finland 29.4.2019 Petri Ekholm, SYKE Southern Finland P losses high and correlate with TSS losses Western Finland P losses, and correlation with TSS losses, lower Soil P decreased from Period III to Period IV

Factors related to ”agricultural” N load (kg km−2 y−1) 29.4.2019 LN = 16 × Field-% −20 × Lake-% + 900 × Runoff, r2 = 0.87 Increase in LN : N in manure, r2 = 0.88, fields on organic soils , r2 = 0.88 No effect on LN : N deposition Regional analysis Western Finland: Grassland, soil temperature, N balance increases LN Petri Ekholm, SYKE

Change in ”agricultural” load 1985–2006 Phosphorus Nitrogen The Kalajoki The Perhonjoki No change Western Finland No change No data Southern Finland No data

Change in ”agricultural” load 1985–2006 (2011) The Kalajoki 3658 km2 Lakes 1.9% Fields 15%

Conclusions Approach Allows the use of national monitoring data 29.4.2019 Approach Allows the use of national monitoring data Gives a several-year average load for a larger area Relatively robust, if sampling strategy remains unchanged, sensitive to outliers Cannot separate agricultural load from natural background ”Agricultural” load P load decreased (especially in Ostrobothnia), N load increased in 2000s P: fertilizer use and animal numbers decreased N: increase in temperature, clearing of new field, manure handling? The analysis is currently being expanded in the project Larger number of sites Larger set of explaining variables Petri Ekholm, SYKE