CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting Beam to NuMI (It’s a worry!) Peter Kasper.
Advertisements

Beam diagnostics control for J-PARC LINAC Guobao SHEN J-PARC Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Mar
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
LHC Beam Operation Comitte24. April INJECTION AND TRANSFER LINE STABILITY L.Drøsdal For the injection team.
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
LHC Injection Sequencing MD 16/23/2009 Injection sequencing / BCM R, Giachino, B. Goddard, (D. Jacquet), V. Kain, M. Meddahi, J. Wenninger.
Orbit related issues of the spin tune control at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, M.Bai, W.MacKay, T.Roser.
Injection and protection W.Bartmann, C.Bracco, B.Goddard, V.Kain, M.Meddahi, V.Mertens, A.Nord, J.Uythoven, J.Wenninger, OP, BI, CO, ABP, collimation,
06:00 – Ongoing injection problems on beam 2  07:42 – Start of injection investigations  11:11 – Injection problem fixed. Resteering of transfer line.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
07:00 Dump fil #2219, 123 pb -1 delivered. Trim TDI parking position to +/- 55 mm in the collimator BP trimmed the temperature kicker limit to 62 degrees.
MPP Workshop: Injection System C. Bracco on behalf of ABT Acknowledgments: STI, ABP, BI,LHC and SPS OP.
HiRadMat Summary of Phase-I and plans for Phase-II commissioning J. Blanco, N. Conan, V. Kain, K. Cornelis, B. Goddard, C. Hessler, M. Meddahi, C. Theis,
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
Aperture measurements during LHC commissioning 2017
The TV Beam Observation system - BTV
Friday Access in shadow of SPS interventions (RF, extraction septa power supply) Lead into problem on the cooling of the extraction septa in SPS Both beams.
Wednesday :06 Dump fill 3533: interlock BPMS in IP6
SPS extraction, transfer lines, injection
Transfer line test: Beam stability measurements
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
Safe Injection into the LHC V.Kain AB/CO
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
FCC-hh injection group 7
Real-time orbit the LHC
Initial Experience with the Machine Protection System for LHC
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Thursday morning – optics correction
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010
Monday – recovery from MKI flashover
Summary week 30 Week 30 R. Bailey & J. Wenninger
Interlocking of CNGS (and other high intensity beams) at the SPS
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Lost at 12:05 to power converter (RTQX2.R1) problem
BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS)
LHC Momentum in 2008 J. Wenninger December 2008.
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Wire almost entirely through beam before BLM triggers dump
Protection against accidental beam loss at the LHC
Friday Morning 7:30 injection for fill 2908
Sunday
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
LHC Closed Orbit For Beam 2
Collimation margins and *
450 GeV Preliminary Commissioning: Measurement Programme
CNGS Primary Beam Results
Monday 24 October hours of 25ns MD
Saturday 3rd November - morning
How to control the local beam density
Scrubbing progress - 08/12/2012
Monday 8th December Morning used for RF work (IP z, injection), damper noise checks. Stable beams period with LHCb spectrometer OFF – lost beam after.
Machine protection and closed orbit
What are these kinks on dipole ramp and the associated beam loss?
Beam Interlocks for Detectors and Movable Devices
TI8 analysis / J. Wenninger
07/08/2010 Fill #1264 dump at 02:14:38.
Sat 18/3 - Ramp to 4 TeV Again glitch on the safe beam flag for beam 2. Cause identified: noise on BCT2B giving values above the safe beam limit (2.4×1010.
Thursday
Wednesday 6th April Injection of 50 ns up to 108 bunches (3 x 36).
Injection Studies: 50 ns ABT/BTP.
Monday 27th August & night
Monday 14th May 00:03UFO at BLMQI.06R8.B2E10_MQML. Beam dump Re-steering required for TI2 03:28 STABLE BEAMS # e11 ppb, 4.11e33 cm-2s-1 13:36.
LHC beam orbit and collision position determination & control – performance and issues, prospects for Run 3 Orbit in collision - Luminosity WS - J. Wenninger.
Beam Stability of the LHC Beam Transfer Line TI 8
Tuesday
Presentation transcript:

CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011 J. Wenninger

Beam Intensity Number of extractions: 2.552 million ! Total intensity on T40 : 4.84 x 1019 p Typical transmission of the CNGS beam through the SPS cycle ~ 95%. Injection losses ~ 6%.

SPS Extraction Before extraction the SPS beam is bumped out by ~ 31 mm to approach the magnetic septum. SPS beam position stability before extraction at 400 GeV ~ 1 mm over a run, dominated by systematic effects. The reading jumped in May after a recalibration of the BPMs. Interlock reference 31,2 mm Interlock tolerance ± 2 mm Error : rms spread

Extraction Losses In 2011 the losses on the absorber protecting the septum (TPSG) were similar to 2008-10. 7 mGray corresponds to ~ 7109 p lost on the septa, i.e. 0.035% of the extracted batch intensity. The integrated loss on the septa in 2010 is 9.8 kGray or 9.81016 p (0.02% of the total intensity on T40). Only 6 extractions (0.0005%) triggered a beam dump by the BLMs (above threshold). Interlock threshold 50 mGray Error : rms spread

TT41 reference trajectory Peak excursion at +- 3 mm in TT40.

TT40-TT41 Trajectory For most position monitors the rms position change over the entire run was only 0.1-0.2 mm. For some monitors the spread is larger, but it is due to : fluctuations of the dp/p error for the H plane, affecting BPMs at places of large dispersion. one important trajectory re-steering for both planes. Error : rms spread

Beam position on the last but one BPM in front of the target Target Beam Position The position stability of the extracted beam was excellent, ~90 mm in H and 60 mm in V over the entire run. Note that the stability is worse than in 2010 because of the choice of BPM. V Extr 1 H Extr 1 Beam position on the last but one BPM in front of the target V Extr 2 H Extr 2

Target Beam Position The position difference extr2 – extr1 has a significantly lower RMS than the raw distributions – beam positions are correlated between the 2 extractions.

Target Beam Position The beam position on target for extraction 1 and 2 are strongly correlated – as indicated by the small rms for extr2-extr1 (previous slide). In the horizontal plane the beam position drifts by 0.2 mm over the year. Note the steering is done to center the beam on the muon detectors. Error : rms spread

Red line is the interlock threshold Transfer Line Losses The transfer of the beam to the target is extremely clean and losses are rare – losses are concentrated in the extraction channel (septum). The higher losses on BLMs No. 19+20 correspond to the collimator in front of T40. Red line is the interlock threshold TT40 TT41

Collimator Losses The typical loss on the collimator in front of T40 are ~3 mGray.