Università di Milano Bicocca LHC2003 International Symposium

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prospect for  s measurement at LHC Alessia Satta on behalf of the LHCb collaboration + some Atlas and CMS results Physics at LHC, 3 rd october 2008.
Advertisements

27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
LHCb Strategies for  from B→DK Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh for the LHCb Collaboration ADS with B + →DK + and B 0 → DK* 0 Dalitz with B + →DK +
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Beauty 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Physics Performance.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
Physics Performance of LHC-B Neville Harnew University of Oxford Beauty-97, Los Angeles October Outline Introduction The LHC-B Experiment New.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
RooFit toy MC sensitivity studies for  +  s and  m s from B s →D s  /K channels at LHCb Shirit Cohen NIKHEF MSc Colloquium May 11 th 2007.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
B→DK strategies in LHCb (Part I) Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 6 th February 2006 FLAVOUR IN THE ERA OF THE LHC.
Beautiful B Physics at the Tevatron IOP HEPP half day meeting Results From the Tevatron Imperial College London, 21 September 2005 Rick Jesik Imperial.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Mauro Donega’ - CDF collaboration meeting February 3, 2006 B d,s ->h 1 h 2 : BR, CP asymmetries, and lifetimes S. Budroni, S. Donati, M. Donega’, S. Giagu,
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
future CP violation Experiment
Reaching for  (present and future)
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
in rappresentanza di LHCb Italia
Ivan Belyaev LAPP/Annecy & ITEP/Moscow
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
Prospects for New Physics in CP Violation and Rare Decays at LHCb
Flavour Tagging performance in LHCb Marc Grabalosa Gándara (14/12/08)
Sebastian Bachmann on behalf of LHCb University of Heidelberg/CERN
For the BaBar Collaboration
B Physics prospects at LHC
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
Quarkonium production in ALICE
FRONTIERS OF MATTER XI th RENCONTRES DE BLOIS
CMS Physics Analysis in China
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
High Level Trigger for rare decays at LHCb
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
B physics prospects at LHCb
Event Reconstruction and Physics Performance of the LHCb Experiment
LHCb Strategies for g from B→DK
Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Potential for precise Unitarity Triangle angles measurements in LHC
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
CMS Physics Analysis in China
Jacopo Nardulli NIKHEF (On behalf of the LHCb collaboration)
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
Bs Physics and Prospects at the Tevatron
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
Time dependent measurements of gamma at LHCb Angelo Carbone (INFN-Bologna) on behalf of LHCb collaboration CKM 2008 Roma, 12 September 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Università di Milano Bicocca LHC2003 International Symposium LHCb Physics reach Marco Musy Università di Milano Bicocca and INFN Milano LHC2003 International Symposium Fermilab, 3th May 2003 Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Ambitious physics goals of LHCb Overconstrain the unitarity triangles Search for New Physics beyond SM Precision CPV measurements, using also pure hadronic and multi-body final states (Bd pp, Bd D*p, . . .) Exploit CPV in new decay channels as in Bs (BsKK, BsDsK, BsJ/yf , . . .) Rare b-decays (BdK* g, BdK*mm, Bsmm . . .) New particles may show up in loop diagrams, overconstrain will allow to disentangle SM components from the new-physics ones b t b High statistics is a requirement NP? d t d Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

CPV from LHCb in one year 2007 CPV from LHCb in one year |Vtd/Vts| sin 2b g and dg not well known |Vub/lVcs| r  fNR Bs mixing BdJ/yKS Bd D*p |Vub/lVcs| If New Physics is there LHCb experiment can spot it in 2008 ! 2008 LHCb h 2007 now BdJ/yKS Bdpp BsJ/yf Bs DsK Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Experimental challenge Bd K*g HIGH STATISTICS BdJ/y r 0 LHCb has to deal with a large variety of final states with different topologies Hot pp environment needs a robust trigger sbb / sinel.~ 0.01 (sbb~ 500 mb), many particles are not associated to b-hadrons b-hadrons do not evolve coherently High bb yield, 1012/year of Bd, Bs , baryons, Bc with bgct ~ 7mm Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

LHCb detector Technologies have not changed Detector has undergone a reduction of material in front of RICH2 (60%  40% for X0, 20%  12% for lI) Less interactions in detector, Level-1 Trigger includes momentum measurement Technologies have not changed  September 2003: “Detector Reoptimization TDR” and “Trigger TDR” Construction phase is in good shape ( T. Nakada talk) Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Fully simulated bb event in Geant3 MC Pythia 6.2 tuned on CDF and UA5 data Multiple pp interactions and spill-over effects included Complete description of material from TDRs Individual detector responses tuned on test beam results Complete pattern recognition in reconstruction: MC true information is never used 1M inclusive bb events produced in Summer 2002 New “Spring” production ready: 10M events for September TDRs Sensitivities quoted here are obtained by rescaling earlier studies to the new yields Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Main performances PV: s ~ 47 mm SV: s ~170 mm VELO RICH Tracking Bs mixing Measure Dms at 5s up to 48 ps-1 2<p<100 GeV/c <e(KK)>= 88% <e(K )>=2.7% RICH e, m PID <e(mm)>= 86% <e(ee )>= 78% <e( e,m)>=1% RICH-1 Tracking <Ntracks>= 27 “physics” tracks etrack ~ 95% p>5 GeV/c “ghost” rate ~ 8% @pT>0.5GeV  see dedicated talks! Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Event yield untagged e tot L = 2x1032 cm–2s-1 eacc* e2track* ecut* eL0* eL1= 13% * (96%)2 * 22% * 61% * 51% Channel e tot Yield B0  p+p- 0.78 % 27 k B0  K+ p- 0.85 % 115 k Bs  K+ K- 0.94 % 35 k Bs Ds-p+ 0.26 % 72 k Bs Ds-K+ 0.34 % 8 k Bs J/y (m-m+ )f 1.66 % 109 k Bs J/y (e-e+ )f 0.29 % 19 k B0 J/y(m-m+) KS 0.76 % 119 k B0K0* g 0.09 % 20 k 1 year = 2 fb -1 L = 2x1032 cm–2s-1 Efficiency includes: Geometrical acceptance, eacc including detection efficiency, material Trigger efficiency: Level-0 && Level-1, eL0,1 including expected Pile-up rate veto Reconstruction efficiency (tracking, calorimeters, PID), etrack Selection cuts efficiency to reconstruct the final state and reject background, ecut norm. to 4p Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Flavour tagging l B0 D p+ p- K- Knowledge of flavour at birth is essential for the majority of CPV measurements Opposite side lepton tag ( b  l ) Opposite side kaon tag ( b  c  s ) - unique to LHCb, BTeV - correlated to hadron trigger Same side pion and kaon tag (with p coming either from B** or fragm. successfully used by CDF already) Vertex charge tagging b d u B0 p+ Only single particle tagging (e, m, K) from opposite side B decay used in this presentation e = 0.40, D = 0.40  e D2 = 6.4% The new MC data give similar results Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Flavour tagging eeff εtag ωtag εeff TOTAL Bs Opposite Side K-tag Typical tagging efficiencies: in Bs  K p, KK, Dsp channels (after L0*L1 trigger, any nr of collisions) Method εtag ωtag εeff m 12.4 35.5 1.0 ±0.1 e 7.7 43.3 0.14 ±0.07 K (OS) 26.3 36.2 2.1 ±0.3 K (SS) 17.3 29.7 2.9 ±0.3 Vtx Charge 23.9 40.0 0.9 ±0.2 IP/s Bs Same Side K-tag TOTAL 65.8 34.8 6.1 ±0.4 Work is in progress to update and improve the efficiencies Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

B(s)  p p, K p, K K max pT min IP/s pT(B) L/sL incl. bb Proper time s = 41 fs incl. bb Selection cuts on Signal charged tracks, PID Reconstructed B signal 92% purity s=18 MeV/c2 pT(B) L/sL Combinatorial bb bckgr, can be fully rejected even relaxing mass cut S/B ~ 1 Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

g from B(s) p p, K K (proposed by R. Fleischer ) Relies on “U-spin” symmetry assumption (ds) which is the only source of theoretical uncertainty Clean measurement of g assuming dg from Bs  J/y f and b from B  J/y Ks Sensitive to New Physics contribution which can be pointed out by comparing with g obtained from DsK Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

g from B(s) p p, K K BS  K+ K- BS  K+ K- B0  + - B0  + - yield 27k 35k B/S 0.8 0.55 xq 0.755 20 D2 0.064 -0.30 0.16 0.58 -0.17 DG 0.0 input values Evaluation of and sensitivity from time-dependent measured asymmetry B0  + - BS  K+ K- Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

g from B(s) p p, K K s(g) ~ 3o B0  + - BS  K+ K- In one year: tagging efficiency  BS  K+ K- In one year: B0  + - BS  K+ K- BS  K+ K- increasing xs  CP asymmetry can be measured in Bs  KK up to xs=40 with an error increase of a factor 1.6 For xs=20 s(g) ~ 3o New! Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

a from B0  p p 5°< s(a) < 10° (depending on parameter value) RICH PID and hadron trigger are fundamental Decay is polluted by penguin diagrams Penguin/Tree might be as high as 0.2 If |P/T| will be known to ±0.1 then 5°< s(a) < 10° (depending on parameter value) Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Bs  Dsp, DsK , K Bs K K Ds  72k Ds  8k Ds K s = 168 mm ~ 6.5 MeV/c2 s = 168 mm s = 418 mm Ds mass (GeV) Bs vtx resolution (mm) Ds vtx resolution (mm) When selecting Bs  Ds K BR(Ds K)/BR(Ds ) = 1/15 while (Ds K)/ (Ds ) = 70 thanks to the RICH PID Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

g from Bs  D-s K+ , D+s K- s(g) ~ 10o s(g) ~ 12o Needed: Hadronic trigger K/p separation Good proper time resolution From the measurement of 4 time-dependent asymmetries one gets g-2dg (with 2dg from BsJ/yf) 2 same order tree level amplitudes (3) : large asymmetries, NP contributes unlikely Sensitivity depends upon relative amplitudes strong phase difference values of g, Dms , DGs /Gs For Dms=20 ps–1: s(g) ~ 10o For Dms=30 ps–1: s(g) ~ 12o la collins dice 2.5k?? In one year: 8k BsDsK reconstructed events Same principle holds for B0  D*p, (study at the time of TP gives similar precision on g, a new evaluation is under way) Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

J/y f is not CP eigenstate: dg from Bs  J/y f In SM fS = -2dg = -2l2h ~10-2 Sensitive to New Physics effects in the Bs-Bs system J/y f is not CP eigenstate: needs fit to angular distributions of decay final states as a function of proper time In one year: 109 k events Bs J/y (m+m-) f 19 k events Bs J/y (e+e-) f Assuming Dms=20 ps–1: s (2dg) ~ 2o s =36±1 fs will be updated for TDR paula c. dice 74k in totale!? e 2 gradi di precisione Determination of DGs s( DGs/ Gs) ~ 0.03 for DGs/Gs = 0.15 Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

b from B0  J/y Ks The ‘gold plated’ channel at B-factories Precision measurement of this parameter is very important: =0 in SM =sin 2b LHCb will bring a lot of statistics to this channel, which can be used to look into higher order effects, and fit Adir will be updated for TDR In one year with 119k events: s (sin 2b ) ~ 0.02 Comparing with other channels may indicate NP in penguin diagrams Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Rare decays: B0  K0* g BR( B0  K0* g ) = (4.30.4) 10-5 Direct CP violation in SM <2%  Sensitive to New Physics effects g W b u,c,t s Mass resolution ~ 72 MeV Background from B0K*p0 can be rejected using K* helicity In one year: 20k events B0  K0* (K+p-) g triggered and reconstructed Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Bc mesons s(ppBc) ~300 nb  109 Bc/ year LHCb acceptance ~30% Possible CPV with Bc J/y D, Bc  DsD, DD, ... Precision measurement of mass, life-time CDF: mBc= 6.4  0.4 GeV, tBc ~ 0.5 ps p (GeV) LHCb preliminary study s(ppBc) ~300 nb  109 Bc/ year Bc  J/y p (BR ~10-2) e ~ 2% 12k events/year Background from B  J/y X and prompt J/y reduced cutting on the distance between primary vertex and Bc vertex M( J/y(mm) p) GeV/c2 Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Current status of LHCb Physics Reach in 1 year (2fb–1) Channel Yield Precision* b Bd  J/y Ks 119 k s(b)  0.6o g Bs  DsK Bd  pp, Bs  KK 8 k 27 k, 35 k s(g) 10o s(g)  3o a Bd  p+p- 27 k s(a)  5o- 10o 2dg Bs  J/y f 128 k s(2dg)  2o |Vtd/Vts| Bs  Dsp 72 k Dms up to 58 ps-1 rare decays Bd  K* g 20 k *Precisions obtained by scaling old results with the new yields All numbers will be updated together with more channels in the re-optimization TDR (September 2003) Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Systematics in CPV measurements Possible sources of systematic uncertainty: Asymmetry of b vs b production Detector efficiencies which depend on charge can bias tagging efficiencies can fake CP asymmetries CP asymmetry also in background processes Alternate runs, swapping the orientation of magnetic field Use control samples available with high statistics: Bs  Dsp 72k events/year B0  J/y K* 600k events/year B  J/y K 600k events/year Study CP asymmetries in the B mass side bands (from Technical Proposal) Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

Conclusion LHCb is a dedicated detector for B physics measurements in many channels from the beginning of LHC A very precise determination of CKM unitarity triangle will be possible Detector performances are being evaluated with a realistic and complete Monte Carlo simulation LHCb offers an excellent opportunity to spot New Physics signals beyond Standard Model very soon at LHC Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

back-up slides Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003

p0 reconstruction PreShower (scintillator+Pb+scintillator) 2X0 ECAL (Pb+ “shashlik” scintillator) 25X0 s(E)/E=10% /E 1.5% HCAL (Fe+scintillator) 5.6 lI s(E)/E=80% /E 10% pT>200 MeV Purity ~20% in range 0.1<m <0.17 GeV/c2 Marco Musy Fermilab 3th May 2003