In the past thirty five years NOAA, with help from NASA, has established a remote sensing capability on polar and geostationary platforms that has proven useful in monitoring and predicting severe weather such as tornadic outbreaks, tropical cyclones, and flash floods in the short term, and climate trends indicated by sea surface temperatures, biomass burning, and cloud cover in the longer term. This has become possible first with the visible and infrared window imagery of the 1970s and has been augmented with the temperature and moisture sounding capability of the 1980s. The imagery from the NOAA satellites, especially the time continuous observations from geostationary instruments, dramatically enhanced our ability to understand atmospheric cloud motions and to predict severe thunderstorms. These data were almost immediately incorporated into operational procedures. Use of sounder data in the operational weather systems is more recently coming of age. The polar orbiting sounders are filling important data voids at synoptic scales. Applications include temperature and moisture analyses for weather prediction, analysis of atmospheric stability, estimation of tropical cyclone intensity and position, and global analyses of clouds. The Advanced TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder (ATOVS) includes both infrared and microwave observations with the latter helping considerably to alleviate the influence of clouds for all weather soundings. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) Imager and Sounder have been used to develop procedures for retrieving atmospheric temperature, moisture, and wind at hourly intervals in the northern hemisphere. Temporal and spatial changes in atmospheric moisture and stability are improving severe storm warnings. Atmospheric flow fields are helping to improve hurricane trajectory forecasting. Applications of these NOAA data also extend to the climate programs; archives from the last fifteen years offer important information about the effects of aerosols and greenhouse gases and possible trends in global temperature. This talk will indicate the present capabilities and foreshadow some of the developments anticipated in the next twenty years. Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison South Africa, April 2006
Outline Visible and Near Infrared: Vegetation Planck Function Infrared: Thermal Sensitivity
Visible (Reflective Bands) Infrared (Emissive Bands)
MODIS BAND 1 (RED) Low reflectance in Vegetated areas Higher reflectance in Non-vegetated land areas
MODIS BAND 2 (NIR) Higher reflectance in Vegetated areas Lower reflectance in Non-vegetated land areas
RED NIR Dense Vegetation Barren Soil
NIR and VIS over Vegetation and Ocean NIR (.86 micron) Green (.55 micron) Red (0.67 micron) RGB NIR
Visible (Reflective Bands) Infrared (Emissive Bands)
Spectral Characteristics of Energy Sources and Sensing Systems NIR IR
Spectral Distribution of Energy Radiated from Blackbodies at Various Temperatures
Radiation is governed by Planck’s Law In wavelenght: B(,T) = c1 /{ 5 [e c2 /T -1] } (mW/m2/ster/cm) where = wavelength (cm) T = temperature of emitting surface (deg K) c1 = 1.191044 x 10-8 (W/m2/ster/cm-4) c2 = 1.438769 (cm deg K) In wavenumber: B(,T) = c13 / [e c2/T -1] (mW/m2/ster/cm-1) where = # wavelengths in one centimeter (cm-1) c1 = 1.191044 x 10-5 (mW/m2/ster/cm-4)
B(max,T)~T5 B(max,T)~T3 max ≠(1/ max) B(,T) versus B(,T) B(,T) 100 20 10 6.6 5 4 3.3 wavelength [µm]
wavelength : distance between peaks (µm) Slide 4 wavenumber : number of waves per unit distance (cm) =1/ d=-1/ 2 d
Using wavenumbers Wien's Law dB(max,T) / dT = 0 where (max) = 1.95T indicates peak of Planck function curve shifts to shorter wavelengths (greater wavenumbers) with temperature increase. Note B(max,T) ~ T**3. Stefan-Boltzmann Law E = B(,T) d = T4, where = 5.67 x 10-8 W/m2/deg4. o states that irradiance of a black body (area under Planck curve) is proportional to T4 . Brightness Temperature c13 T = c2/[ln(______ + 1)] is determined by inverting Planck function B Brightness temperature is uniquely related to radiance for a given wavelength by the Planck function.
c13 c1 Using wavenumbers Using wavelengths c2/T c2 /T B(,T) = c13 / [e -1] B(,T) = c1 /{ 5 [e -1] } (mW/m2/ster/cm-1) (mW/m2/ster/cm) (max in cm-1) = 1.95T (max in cm)T = 0.2897 B(max,T) ~ T**3. B( max,T) ~ T**5. E = B(,T) d = T4, E = B(,T) d = T4, o o c13 c1 T = c2/[ln(______ + 1)] T = c2/[ ln(______ + 1)] B 5 B
Planck Function and MODIS Bands
MODIS BAND 20 Window Channel: little atmospheric absorption surface features clearly visible Clouds are cold
MODIS BAND 31 Window Channel: little atmospheric absorption surface features clearly visible Clouds are cold
Clouds at 11 µm look bigger than at 4 µm
Temperature sensitivity dB/B = dT/T The Temperature Sensitivity is the percentage change in radiance corresponding to a percentage change in temperature Substituting the Planck Expression, the equation can be solved in : =c2/T
∆B11> ∆B4 ∆B11 T=300 K Tref=220 K ∆B4
∆B4/B4= 4 ∆T/T ∆B11/B11 = 11 ∆T/T ∆B4/B4>∆B11/B11 4 > 11 (values in plot are referred to wavelength)
(Approximation of) B as function of and T ∆B/B= ∆T/T Integrating the Temperature Sensitivity Equation Between Tref and T (Bref and B): B=Bref(T/Tref) Where =c2/T (in wavenumber space)
B=Bref(T/Tref) B=(Bref/ Tref) T B T The temperature sensitivity indicates the power to which the Planck radiance depends on temperature, since B proportional to T satisfies the equation. For infrared wavelengths, = c2/T = c2/T. __________________________________________________________________ Wavenumber Typical Scene Temperature Temperature Sensitivity 900 300 4.32 2500 300 11.99
Non-Homogeneous FOV 1-N Tcold=220 K N Thot=300 K B=NB(Thot)+(1-N)B(Tcold) BT=NBThot+(1-N)BTcold
For NON-UNIFORM FOVs: Bobs=(1-N)Bcold+NBhot Bobs=(1-N) Bref(Tcold/Tref)+ N Bref(Thot/Tref) Bobs= Bref(1/Tref) ((1-N) Tcold + NThot) For N=.5 Bobs= .5Bref(1/Tref) ( Tcold + Thot) Bobs= .5Bref(1/TrefTcold) (1+ (Thot/ Tcold) ) The greater the more predominant the hot term At 4 µm (=12) the hot term more dominating than at 11 µm (=4) N 1-N Tcold Thot
Consequences At 4 µm (=12) clouds look smaller than at 11 µm (=4) In presence of fires the difference BT4-BT11 is larger than the solar contribution The different response in these 2 windows allow for cloud detection and for fire detection
Conclusions Vegetation: highly reflective in the Near Infrared and highly absorptive in the visible red. The contrast between these channels is a useful indicator of the status of the vegetation; Planck Function: at any wavenumber/wavelength relates the temperature of the observed target to its radiance (for Blackbodies) Thermal Sensitivity: different emissive channels respond differently to target temperature variations. Thermal Sensitivity helps in explaining why, and allows for cloud and fire detection.