Clustered Organization of Reproductive Genes in the C. elegans Genome

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Advertisements

Matan Goldshtein, David B. Lukatsky  Biophysical Journal 
Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
Jianbin Wang, Julianne Garrey, Richard E. Davis  Current Biology 
Laurel B. Bender, Ru Cao, Yi Zhang, Susan Strome  Current Biology 
David J. Katz, T. Matthew Edwards, Valerie Reinke, William G. Kelly 
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Michael Cullen, Stephen P
by Holger Weishaupt, Mikael Sigvardsson, and Joanne L. Attema
A Tumor Sorting Protocol that Enables Enrichment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells and Facilitation of Genetic Analyses  Zachary S. Boyd, Rajiv Raja,
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
The Tsk2/+ Mouse Fibrotic Phenotype Is Due to a Gain-of-Function Mutation in the PIIINP Segment of the Col3a1 Gene  Kristen B. Long, Zhenghui Li, Chelsea.
Ying-Ying Yu, Ph. D. , Cui-Xiang Sun, Ph. D. , Yin-Kun Liu, Ph. D
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Roberta L. Hannibal, Julie C. Baker  Current Biology 
Emily C. Walsh, Kristie A. Mather, Stephen F
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
The Stat3/GR Interaction Code: Predictive Value of Direct/Indirect DNA Recruitment for Transcription Outcome  David Langlais, Catherine Couture, Aurélio.
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 16, Pages (August 2004)
Postmeiotic Sex Chromatin in the Male Germline of Mice
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
Joshua C. Black, Capucine Van Rechem, Johnathan R. Whetstine 
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
A Global Profile of Germline Gene Expression in C. elegans
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Sonal S. Joshi, Victoria H. Meller  Current Biology 
Airong Li, Sonia Davila, Laszlo Furu, Qi Qian, Xin Tian, Patrick S
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Conserved Histone Variant H2A
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
E.J. Hollox, J.A.L. Armour, J.C.K. Barber 
The C. elegans Glycopeptide Hormone Receptor Ortholog, FSHR-1, Regulates Germline Differentiation and Survival  Saeyoull Cho, Katherine W. Rogers, David S.
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (February 2017)
Predicting Gene Expression from Sequence
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Biomedical Discovery with DNA Arrays
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (August 2002)
Genomic Analysis of Gastrulation and Organogenesis in the Mouse
Doxorubicin Enhances Nucleosome Turnover around Promoters
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Hulusi Cinar, Sunduz Keles, Yishi Jin  Current Biology 
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
The Tsk2/+ Mouse Fibrotic Phenotype Is Due to a Gain-of-Function Mutation in the PIIINP Segment of the Col3a1 Gene  Kristen B. Long, Zhenghui Li, Chelsea.
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number alterations.
Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation
Presentation transcript:

Clustered Organization of Reproductive Genes in the C. elegans Genome Michael A. Miller, Asher D. Cutter, Ikuko Yamamoto, Samuel Ward, David Greenstein  Current Biology  Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages 1284-1290 (July 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.025

Figure 1 Sperm-Enriched Genes Are Nonrandomly Distributed across the Genome The probability that the observed number of sperm-enriched genes lies in a given 0.5 cM interval is plotted as a function of recombination distance (centimorgans) for each chromosome. Similar results were observed with 250 kb chromosome intervals. An M marks the positions of msp genes. Black bars represent chromosomal windows analyzed in Figure 2. Current Biology 2004 14, 1284-1290DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.025)

Figure 2 Observed versus Expected Distribution of Genes within SGC Regions that Have Common mRNA Expression Patterns DNA microarrays comprising either 63% or 92% of total loci in the genome were used to identify genes with common transcriptional profiles [10, 15–17]. The ratio of the number of observed to the number expected by chance is plotted for each microarray dataset. Chromosomal windows containing clusters II (–3.2 to –0.5 cM), IV-A (+1.0 to +2.3 cM), and IV-B (+3.9 to +5.0) are plotted separately. *P < 0.001. Current Biology 2004 14, 1284-1290DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.025)

Figure 3 Differences in Reproductive Gene Clustering in C. elegans and C. briggsae Correlate with Differences in Regulation (A) Genes in clustered regions of the C. elegans genome are distributed differently in C. briggsae. Colors represent distinct C. briggsae supercontigs mapped onto C. elegans genomic regions by using the positions of homologous genes. If multiple C. briggsae homologs of a C. elegans gene exist on different supercontigs, then sequence breaks were minimized, if possible. msp genes were not included because sequence analyses suggest that they are paralogous (see Figure S2). C. elegans chromosome positions are shown below in Mb (cM). The positions of selected C. elegans reproductive genes are shown above each chromosome region. Asterisks indicate the relative positions of C. briggsae msp genes. (B) C. briggsae supercontigs that exhibit synteny with clustered chromosome IV regions lack most reproductive genes, including the msps. Red arrowheads mark the relative positions of C. elegans msp genes in these C. briggsae supercontigs. The positions of black genes are conserved in both species, whereas red genes have different locations. Black arrows represent C. elegans sperm-enriched genes whose positions are conserved in the two genomes. (C) DAPI staining indicates that C. briggsae (Cb) oocytes progress through pachytene and diplotene meiotic stages more gradually (arrows) than C. elegans (Ce). MAPK activation, assayed by using the MAPK-YT antibody [12], is downregulated in C. elegans as oocytes exit pachytene (arrowhead). By contrast, this does not occur in C. briggsae. Other differences include brood size variability, reproductive efficiency, and the rate of sheath cell contraction. Current Biology 2004 14, 1284-1290DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.025)