No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical benefit using sperm hyaluronic acid binding technique in ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Ronit Beck-Fruchter, Eliezer Shalev,
Advertisements

Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated  Baris Ata, Brian Kaplan, Hal Danzer, Michael Glassner, Michael.
Kay Neumann, Georg Griesinger  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation
Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during IVF  Laura Rienzi, Fiorenza Bariani, Michela Dalla Zorza, Stefania.
Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial  Eman A. Elgindy, Ahmed.
Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Juan Enrique Schwarze, Javier A
Clinical benefit using sperm hyaluronic acid binding technique in ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Ronit Beck-Fruchter, Eliezer Shalev,
Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics  Alison Campbell, Simon Fishel, Natalie Bowman, Samantha.
Repeated implantation failure at the crossroad between statistics, clinics and over- diagnosis  Edgardo Somigliana, Paola Vigano, Andrea Busnelli, Alessio.
Reduction in exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate  Jun Qiang Zhang, Xiu Ling Li, Yuzhu Peng,
Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during IVF  Laura Rienzi, Fiorenza Bariani, Michela Dalla Zorza, Stefania.
Freeze-all can be a superior therapy to another fresh cycle in patients with prior fresh blastocyst implantation failure  Bruce S Shapiro, Said T Daneshmand,
Time-lapse morphokinetic assessment has low to moderate ability to predict euploidy when patient– and ovarian stimulation–related factors are taken into.
Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by time-lapse monitoring  Csaba Pribenszky, Szabolcs Mátyás, Péter Kovács, Eszter Losonczi,
Fresh transfer outcome predicts the success of a subsequent frozen transfer utilizing blastocysts of the same cohort  L.F. Doherty, J.R. Martin, U. Kayisli,
Factors affecting embryo viability and uterine receptivity: insights from an analysis of the UK registry data  Stephen A. Roberts, Mark Hann, Daniel R.
A. Cobo, Nicolás Garrido, Juana Crespo, Remohí José, Antonio Pellicer 
Female gender pre-selection by maternal diet in combination with timing of sexual intercourse – a prospective study  A.M. Noorlander, J.P.M. Geraedts,
Semra Kahraman, Zafer Nihat Candan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Katja Knez, Tomaz Tomazevic, Eda Vrtacnik-Bokal, Irma Virant-Klun 
Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS  Alison Campbell, Simon Fishel,
Inositol supplementation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of.
Perinatal outcomes after stimulated versus natural cycle IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Mohan Shashikant Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, Mariano.
Semen cryopreservation and usage rate for assisted reproductive technology in 898 men with cancer  Iris Muller, Ralph J.A. Oude Ophuis, Frank J.M. Broekmans,
K. Gersak, A. Veble  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo developmental timing in an oocyte donation model  María Cruz, Nicolás Garrido, Blanca.
S Munné, E Fragouli, P Colls, MG Katz-Jaffe, WB Schoolcraft, D Wells 
Pregnancy and live birth following the transfer of vitrified–warmed blastocysts derived from zona- and corona-cell-free oocytes  Yimin Shu, Wenlin Peng,
L. Simon, I. Proutski, M. Stevenson, D. Jennings, J. McManus, D
Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer?  F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, J. Leger, R. Bidault, V. Cadoret,
Cumulative live-birth delivery after IVF/ICSI since the progressive introduction of single- embryo transfer  D. De Neubourg, C. Daels, M. Elseviers, K.
Individual demands of human embryos on IVF culture medium: influence on blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome  B. Wirleitner, P. Vanderzwalmen,
Morphokinetics of human blastocyst expansion in vitro
Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence
Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during PGD/PGS cycles  Danilo Cimadomo, Filippo Maria Ubaldi, Antonio.
Influence of paternal age on ongoing pregnancy rate at eight weeks' gestation in assisted reproduction  Aukje Marieke Meijerink, Liliana Ramos, Kathrin.
Lisa Cummins, Juliette Koch, Suha Kilani 
Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar.
Cassandra’s prophecy: medic or mother
The oviduct: a neglected organ due for re-assessment in IVF
In vitro culture of individual mouse preimplantation embryos: the role of embryo density, microwells, oxygen, timing and conditioned media  Rebecca L.
Aneuploidy is a key causal factor of delays in blastulation: author response to ‘A cautionary note against aneuploidy risk assessment using time-lapse.
Prediction of in-vitro developmental competence of early cleavage-stage mouse embryos with compact time-lapse equipment  Csaba Pribenszky, Eszter Losonczi,
S. T. Yang, J. X. Shi, F. Gong, S. P. Zhang, C. F. Lu, K. Tan, L. Z
Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Juan Enrique Schwarze, Javier A
Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective  I.S. Rodino, P.J. Burton, K.A. Sanders  Reproductive.
V Isachenko, E Isachenko, R Kreienberg, M Woriedh, JM Weiss 
A clinically useful simplified blastocyst grading system
A direct healthcare cost analysis of the cryopreserved versus fresh transfer policy at the blastocyst stage  Enrico Papaleo, Luca Pagliardini, Valeria.
Morphokinetic parameters in chromosomal translocation carriers undergoing preimplantation genetic testing  Jenna Lammers, Arnaud Reignier, Carole Splingart,
Russell–Silver syndrome due to paternal H19/IGF2 hypomethylation in a patient conceived using intracytoplasmic sperm injection  M. Chopra, D.J. Amor,
Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah 
Response: time-lapse systems for ART
Time-lapse analysis of mouse embryo development in oxygen gradients
Cumulative success rates following mild IVF in unselected infertile patients: a 3-year, single-centre cohort study  Daniel Bodri, Satoshi Kawachiya, Michaël.
New approaches to embryo selection
Elective single-embryo transfer: persuasive communication strategies can affect choice in a young British population  O.B.A. van den Akker, S. Purewal 
Duration of blastulation may be associated with ongoing pregnancy rate in single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles  Sezcan Mumusoglu, Irem Y. Ozbek,
Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?
Mariana M. Piccolomini, Mariana Nicolielo, Tatiana C. S
Live birth following early follicular phase oocyte collection and vitrified-warmed embryo transfer 8 days later  Safak Hatırnaz, Ebru Hatırnaz, Baris.
Implantation of fresh and thawed–warmed embryos in single embryo transfer cycles: interpreting the initial beta-HCG  Cynthia K. Sites, Peter St Marie,
Limitations of a time-lapse blastocyst prediction model: a large multicentre outcome analysis  Kirstine Kirkegaard, Alison Campbell, Inge Agerholm, Ursula.
Claudio Manna, Loris Nanni, Alessandra Lumini, Sebastiana Pappalardo 
Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development.
M. Seiringer, M. Maurer, O. Shebl, K. Dreier, G. Tews, S. Ziehr, G
A. Finn, L. Scott, Thomas O’Leary, D. Davies, J. Hill 
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Presentation transcript:

No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study  L. Rienzi, A. Capalbo, M. Stoppa, S. Romano, R. Maggiulli, L. Albricci, C. Scarica, A. Farcomeni, G. Vajta, F.M. Ubaldi  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 57-66 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.012 Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Time-lapse imaging of a forming blastocyst. (A) begining of the compaction process; (B) begining of the blastulation process; and (C) formation of the full blastocyst and begining of the expansion process (<10% diameter increase). Grading performed according to Campbell et al. (2013a). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 57-66DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.012) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Distribution of euploid (green dots) and aneuploid (blue dots) embryos according to time (h) between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and completed versus initiated blastulation as suggested by Campbell et al. (2013a). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 57-66DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.012) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Percentage of euploid embryos according to hierarchical classification as suggested by Basile et al. (2014). The embryo is categorized as A or B if the value of completion of interval for completion of cleavage from to two to five cells is more than 20.5 h; on the other hand, if the value is outside this range, the embryo is categorized as C or D. Moreover, if the value of the third cell cycle fell inside the range 11.7–18.2 h, the embryo is categorized as A or C depending on completion of interval for completion of cleavage from to two to five cells; if the value of the third cell cycle fell outside the range, the embryo was categorized as B or D depending on completion of interval for completion of cleavage from to two to five cells. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2015 30, 57-66DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.012) Copyright © 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions