SOE Retreat Data Summaries Report 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David Fairris Tarek Azzam
Advertisements

Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Summary of NJQSAC Interim Review, Spring and Fall 2013 Student Achievement, and HS Graduation Rate DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
A Comprehensive Look at the Outcomes of Teacher Preparation Systemwide Evaluation of Teacher Preparation in the California State University 1.
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
San Francisco State University Enrollment Planning and Management Academic Institutional Research The SFSU Undergraduate Exit Survey
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Annual Report and Public Hearing Grapevine-Colleyville ISD
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Longwood University Professional Education Unit Annual Report.
WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT TEACHER TURNOVER IN SPECIAL EDUCATION 2007 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Bonnie S. Billingsley Virginia Tech School of Education.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
Graduate Student Survey Fall Respondent characteristics  423 responses – 15% of graduate population  Distribution by gender, ethnicity and age.
Policymakers/The Field of Education focused on educators ability to impact P12 student learning All program areas are tasked with providing evidence our.
Educational Effectiveness Fall Faculty Retreat 2006 Leanne Neilson Halyna Kornuta.
2.3.4 MVNU Annual Education Unit & Program Assessment Part I.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
The Impact of Mobile First and Responsive Web Designs Kevin Tharp
Educator Performance Assessments ESE Spring Convening May 27 and 28, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
Exhibit 3.11 Data Report to Unit Assessment Committee Spring 2008.
Longwood University Professional Education Unit Annual Report 2011.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
1 Monroe County School District Spending vs. Student Achievement John R. Dick School Board District 4.
Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.
Graduate School of Education Assessment Update 2009 State of the School September 23, 2009.
Chapter 3 Percentiles. Standard Scores A standard score is a score derived from raw data and has a known basis for comparison. A standard score is a score.
Understanding Growth Targets and Target Adjustment Guidance for Student Learning Objectives Cleveland Metropolitan School District Copyright © 2014 American.
Program Evaluation Single Subject Credential Program Note: Beginning spring 2008 EDSC will use the electronic submission system allowing for.
North Kingstown School Committee Feb. 29, 2012 MH 2/23/2012.
Treasurer’s Report Yearly Meeting 2015 Charles Schade, Treasurer Roger Wise, Assistant Treasurer.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Performance-Based Accreditation
Implementing edTPA An Overview.
Main Page.
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
“An Impact School Partnership”
2016 Year-End Performance Management
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
State System of the.
School of Education Chapel – 9/13/2016
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Teaching Goal Overview Drake CPHS
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
The Impact of a Special Advising Program on Students’ Progress
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Similarity Modeling Chuck Boucek
By Jude Haas, Lauren Kilgore & Amy Baxter
Creating great SEND provision through school to school collaboration
Hollydale Elementary Data Overview
Noblesville High School: Standards based grading Update
Hartnell Climate Results
Evaluation and Assessment of the Individual: Week 2 Discussion
Highlights: 2009 Early Enrollment Estimates
Central Piedmont Community College
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
(CMS Graduates Attending CPCC from Fall )
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Undergraduate Survey Data
Data Overview West Forsyth High School Forsyth County Schools, Georgia
2011 CEPP Retreat Data Report
Beyond Graduate Survey 2015 Summary Analysis
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS EDUCATION TRACK IMPROVES SELF-RATED COMPETENCIES IN PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS Bohling, C1, Williams, A1, Eustis, H1, Miller, J1, Meyer,
My name (and my picture?)
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Portfolio Development
How online discussion forum format influences student learning
Presentation transcript:

SOE Retreat Data Summaries Report 2010 Presented by Gary Miller

Outline Overview of report Highlights of summaries. Educational Administration Graduate Secondary and Elementary Special Education Initial Program (Undergraduate) Gifted and Talented

Educational Administration

Comparison of Student and Principal Disposition Overview Comparison of Student and Principal Disposition ISLCC Scores

Comparison of Students Disposition Formula = Students Self Assessment - Principals Assessment Students evaluate themselves worse than principals In 2007, principals scores were significantly lower

Comparison of ISLCC Scores

Graduate elementary and secondary

Overview Conceptual Framework NBPTS Service Learning for Diversity

Conceptual Framework Difference in averages comparing elementary vs. secondary students Difference Formula = Elementary Average – Secondary Average Elementary students have scored higher than secondary students except in 2007

NBPTS Scores Difference in averages comparing elementary vs. secondary students Difference Formula = Elementary Average – Secondary Average Differences not as significant as conceptual framework

Service Learning for Diversity Difference in averages comparing elementary vs. secondary students Difference Formula = Elementary Average – Secondary Average Elementary students have been scoring higher in experience but lower in democracy and community

Special Education

No significant differences CEC Scores No significant differences

Undergraduate

Summary of Philosophy and INTASC Portfolio Scores Overview Summary of Philosophy and INTASC Portfolio Scores Summary of Impact on P-12 Student Learning

Philosophy and INTASC Philosophy scores have been trending downward INTASC scores relatively unchanged

P-12 Impact on Student Learning Fall 2009 Data

P-12 Impact on Student Learning Fall 2009 Frequency Distribution

P-12 Impact on Student Learning Spring 2010 Data

P-12 Impact on Student Learning Spring 2010 Frequency Distribution

Gifted and Talented

Overview Summary of Field Experience Evaluations W595 NAGC/CEC Scores W554 NACS/CEC Scores Limited Data Available

Field Experience Evaluations

NAGC/CEC Scores

NAGC/CEC Scores

Questions Copies of the full data report available by email