Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Lionel Costenaro, J. Günter Grossmann, Christine Ebel, Anthony Maxwell 
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Kei-ichi Okazaki, Shoji Takada  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
The Closing Mechanism of DNA Polymerase I at Atomic Resolution
Structure and Plasticity of Endophilin and Sorting Nexin 9
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Ryan C. Wilson, Janice D. Pata  Molecular Cell 
Structure and Plasticity of Endophilin and Sorting Nexin 9
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Improved Structures of Full-Length p97, an AAA ATPase: Implications for Mechanisms of Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Change  Jason M. Davies, Axel.
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Seisuke Yamashita, Kozo Tomita  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Kevin D. Corbett, James M. Berger  Structure 
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 360-370 (March 2008) Crystal Structure of an Intact Type II DNA Topoisomerase: Insights into DNA Transfer Mechanisms  Marc Graille, Lionel Cladière, Dominique Durand, François Lecointe, Danièle Gadelle, Sophie Quevillon-Cheruel, Patrice Vachette, Patrick Forterre, Herman van Tilbeurgh  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 360-370 (March 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.12.020 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 DNA Topoisomerase Organization and Electron Density Maps (A) Schematic representation of type II DNA topoisomerases. (B) Experimental electron density map at 3.55 Å resolution (contour: 1σ) overlaid on the final model. For clarity, only the Cα backbone is shown. Residues from topo VI-A and topo VI-B are colored magenta and yellow, respectively. (C) Refined 2Fo − Fc electron density map at 3.55 Å resolution (contour: 1σ). Structure 2008 16, 360-370DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of the S. shibatae Topo VI Enzyme (A) Ribbon representation of the S. shibatae topo VI A2B2 heterotetramer. One AB heterodimer has the same domain coloring scheme code as in Figure 1A. The radicicol drug bound to topo VI-B is shown in yellow space filling. Left and right panels are related by a 60° rotation. (B) Ribbon representation of the topo VI-A/topo VI-B interface. Parts of the peptide chain that were missing in the previous individually crystallized topo VI-A′ and topo VI-B′ subunits are in yellow and magenta, respectively (Corbett and Berger, 2003; Nichols et al., 1999). Residues already present in topo VI-A′ and topo VI-B′ crystal structures are colored red and green, respectively. (C) Superimposition of the four AB heterodimers present in the asymmetric unit onto their 5Y-CAP domains. (D) Experimental SAXS pattern with associated error bars (representing one standard deviation). Inset: surface representation of the most typical ab initio model derived from the experimental scattering curve using Gasbor (see main text for details). (E) Superposition onto the topo VI-A homodimer of the two copies of the A2B2 topo VI heterotetramer present in the asymmetric unit (yellow and red). The rotation angles needed to superpose the ATPase domains of both copies are indicated. (F) Same representation as (E) but rotated by 90°. Structure 2008 16, 360-370DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison with Mm-Topo VI (A) Stereo view representation of the superposition of Mm-topo VI (gray) onto Ss-topo VI (A subunits in green and magenta; B subunits in blue and yellow). (B) Superposition of transducer domains of Mm-topo VI-B (gray) and Ss-topo VI-B (blue). The longitudinal axis of helix α11 from Mm-topo VI-B is depicted by dashed lines. Lys450 from Ss-topo VI-B and Lys458 from Mm-topo VI-B are shown as sticks. (C) Stereo view representation of the superposition of the Mm-topo VI (gray) and Ss-topo VI heterodimer interface (topo VI-A and topo VI-B colored green and blue, respectively). (D) Ribbon representation of the superposition of the experimentally determined open (same color code as in Figure 2A) and modeled closed (gray) forms of topo VI. The orientation is the same as in the left panel of Figure 2A. (E) Ribbon representation of two views of a model for the ATP-bound form of topo VI. Topo VI-A on the right has the same orientation as in (A). This form was modeled in three steps. First, the ϕ/ψ angles from residues of the hinge region (Ser157–Glu159) connecting the 5Y-CAP and Toprim domains of topo VI-A were modified so as to bring both catalytic Tyr106s within a 20 Å distance. Second, the structure of the AMPPNP-topo VI-B′ complex was superposed onto both topo VI-Bs of the heterotetramer using the transducer domain as reference. Finally, ϕ/ψ angles from topo VI-B residues Arg449–Lys452 were modified so as to obtain a topo VI-B homodimer similar to the one observed for topo VI-B′ in the presence of AMPPNP. Structure 2008 16, 360-370DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Topo VI Catalytic Cycle G and T DNA segments are represented in gray and orange. Topo VI-B subunits are in blue and yellow, while topo VI-A subunits are in green and magenta. Structure 2008 16, 360-370DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.12.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions