Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Advertisements

by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
I-Cheng Ho, Martin R Hodge, John W Rooney, Laurie H Glimcher  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse Col7a1 Gene in Keratinocytes: Basal and Transforming Growth Factor-β Regulated Expression  Michael Naso, Jouni Uitto,
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
The Basis for IL-2-Induced IL-2 Receptor α Chain Gene Regulation
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Antonio Porro, Sascha Feuerhahn, Joachim Lingner  Cell Reports 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and SEN1 genes in rpb4Δ and isogenic wild type cells. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and.
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
VP16 and Ubiquitin Current Biology
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
A Stage-Specific Enhancer of Immunoglobulin J Chain Gene Is Induced by Interleukin-2 in a Presecretor B Cell Stage  Chang-Joong Kang, Colleen Sheridan,
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 493-503 (March 2002) Telomeric Proteins Regulate Episomal Maintenance of Epstein-Barr Virus Origin of Plasmid Replication  Zhong Deng, Larissa Lezina, Chi-Ju Chen, Svetlana Shtivelband, Wingkan So, Paul M. Lieberman  Molecular Cell  Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 493-503 (March 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00476-8 Copyright © 2002 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of EBNA1-Dependent DS Binding Proteins (A) Schematic of EBV OriP structure consisting of the family of repeats (FR) and dyad symmetry (DS) regions. (B) SL1 (HA-EBNA1+) nuclear extracts were subjected to two sequential rounds of DS or ZRE control DNA affinity purification and assayed by Western blotting with anti-HA. Second round affinity-purified proteins were eluted with 300 mM KCl (lanes 2 and 3) followed by 1000 mM KCl (lanes 4 and 5). 0.5% of the input material is shown in lane 1. EBNA1 is indicated by the arrow. (C) DS or ZRE affinity-purified proteins shown in (B) were assayed by silver staining. (D) SL1 or HeLa nuclear extracts were purified using two sequential rounds of DS DNA affinity purification. EBNA1 protein was identified by Western blotting with anti-HA. (E) Second round DS affinity-purified proteins from HeLa or SL1 cells were eluted with 300 mM KCl (lanes 1 and 2) followed by 1000 mM KCl (lanes 3 and 4) and analyzed by silver staining. (F) Polypeptides isolated by DNA affinity purification were identified by μLC/MS/MS. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 493-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00476-8) Copyright © 2002 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 TRF2 and Tankyrase Bind to DS In Vitro and In Vivo (A) HeLa or SL1 nuclear extracts were subjected to a single round of DS-DNA affinity purification with washing at 150 or 300 mM KCl, as indicated above each lane, and assayed by Western blot for Tankyrase, TRF2, PARP, or EBNA1 as indicated. 0.5% of input protein is indicated in lanes 1 and 2. (B) SL1 nuclear extract was purified over a single round of DS (Dyad) or control (ZRE) DNA affinity chromatography and assayed by Western blotting with indicated antibodies. (C) Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was used to measure the association of TRF2 and Tankyrase (TANK) with OriP in vivo using formaldehyde crosslinked Raji cells. Input or immunoprecipitated DNA (3-fold dilutions) was amplified with primers specific for EBV OriP or BRLF1 sequences. Chromatin was precipitated with antibodies to TRF2, Tankyrase, EBNA1, or control antibody FLAG-M2 (Sigma). Quantification of each PCR product is shown below. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 493-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00476-8) Copyright © 2002 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cooperative Binding of TRF2 and EBNA1 to DS (A) Schematic of EBNA1 binding sites and nonamer repeats in DS and mutated nonamer repeats in DSΔa,b,c. (B) Coomassie brilliant blue staining of SDS-PAGE gels showing affinity-purified TRF2 and EBNA1 proteins (100 ng) derived from baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells. (C) Increasing concentrations of TRF2 (12.5–50 ng) were assayed for EMSA binding to DS (lanes 1–8) or DSΔa,b,c (lanes 9–16) in the absence or presence of 5 ng of EBNA1 (as indicated above). (D) Quantification of DNA binding shown in (C). (E) Increasing concentrations of EBNA1 (2.5–10 ng) were assayed for EMSA binding to DS (lanes 1–8) or DSΔa,b,c (lanes 9–16) in the absence or presence of 25 ng TRF2. (F) Quantification of DNA binding shown in (E). Molecular Cell 2002 9, 493-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00476-8) Copyright © 2002 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 EBNA1 Stimulates TRF2 Binding to the DS Nonamer Repeats Recombinant EBNA1 and TRF2 generated from baculovirus were assayed by DNase I footprinting of the OriP DS region. “G” and “G+A” are chemical sequencing ladders. EBNA1 binding sites are indicated as sites 1–4. Nonamer repeats (TTAGGGTT) are indicated “a,” “b,” and “c.” (A and B) TRF2 (100 ng) and EBNA1 (50 ng) were compared alone or together for DNase footprinting on the noncoding (A) or coding (B) strand. (C) Wild-type (wt) and nonamer substitution mutant (Δa,b,c) were used as probes for DNase I footprinting for TRF2 over a concentration range of 12–100 ng (3-fold dilutions) in the absence or presence of EBNA1 (50 ng). (D) Sequences protected by EBNA1 and TRF2 in DNase I footprinting assays. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 493-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00476-8) Copyright © 2002 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 TRF1 and TRF2 Affect OriP-Dependent DNA Replication Function (A) OriP-containing pHEBO plasmid was assayed for transient DNA replication in transfected 293 cells. pHEBO was cotransfected with pHA-EBNA1 (lanes 3–6) or with control vector (lane 2) and with either TRF1 (lane 4), ΔTRF2 (lane 5), TRF2 (lane 6), or control expression vector CMV2-FLAG (lane 3). DpnI-resistant DNA linearized with BamHI is indicated for lanes 2–6 (top panel). The same DNA samples were restricted with BamHI only (lower panel). BamHI-digested pHEBO (0.5 ng) was used as a reference in lane 1. pHEBO-specific probes were generated by random priming for Southern blots. HA-EBNA1 expression levels in transfected cells were assayed by Western blotting with anti-HA. Flag-TRF1 and Flag-ΔTRF2 were assayed by Western blotting with anti-Flag. TRF2 and ΔTRF2 were detected by anti-TRF2 antibody. DpnI-resistant pHEBO DNA from three similar experiments was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. (B) DS wt- or DSΔa,b,c-containing plasmids were assayed for transient DNA replication using DpnI/BamHI digestion (top panel). BamHI-digested DNA is shown in the lower panel. Cells were transfected with expression vectors for EBNA1 (lanes 2–4 and 6–8), TRF1 (lanes 3 and 7), ΔTRF2 (lanes 4 and 8), or CMV2-FLAG control vector (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6). Quantification of DpnI-resistant DNA by PhosphoImager analysis is shown in the bar graph below. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 493-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00476-8) Copyright © 2002 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PAR-Dependent Regulation of OriP Plasmid Maintenance (A) Akata cells electroporated with OriP wt or OriPΔa,b,c were selected by FACS for equal numbers of GFP-positive cells, cultured identically for 3 weeks, and assayed by Southern blot for maintenance of OriP plasmids. (B) D98/HR1 cells transfected with OriP were selected by FACS for GFP-positive cells and cultured with 10 mM niacinamide, 50 μM hydroxyurea, or no treatment for 3 weeks and then assayed for plasmid maintenance by Southern blot. (C) Same as in (B), except cells were subjected to a second cell sorting after 3 weeks in culture. Equal numbers of GFP-positive cells were isolated immediately prior to Southern blotting analysis. (D) Nuclear extracts derived from D98 cells treated with hydroxyurea, niacinamide, or no treatment were subjected to DS-DNA affinity purification and Western blotting with antibody specific for PAR modification (α-PAR) or EBNA1 protein (lower panel; α-EBNA1). (E) DS affinity-purified proteins from HeLa or SL1 nuclear extracts were incubated with 32P-NAD and analyzed by autoradiography of SDS-PAGE gels. (F) DS affinity-purified proteins from SL1 cells were subjected to incubation with (+) or without (−) 1 mM NAD and assayed by Western blotting with antibodies specific for Tankyrase (top panel), EBNA1 (middle panel), or TRF2 (lower panel). Molecular Cell 2002 9, 493-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00476-8) Copyright © 2002 Cell Press Terms and Conditions