GLD IR optimization and background study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

Selected topics from the recent GLD studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK 19 July, 2006 GLD lunch time meeting At VCLW06.
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
“GLD” Detector Concept Study 21. Mar. Y. Sugimoto KEK.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
The GLD Concept. MDI Issues Impact on Detector Design L*  Background (back-scattered e+-, , n) into VTX, TPC Crossing angle  Minimum veto angle for.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
1 ACFA8, July , 2005, Youngjoon Kwon (Yonsei Univ.) Simulation / Recon. Workgroup summary for ACFA8  The Framework for Sim./Recon. Status report.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Software Tools in GLD study Akiya Miyamoto KEK For Orsay Software Workshop 2 May, Based on ACFA-SIM-J activities K.Fujii 2, Y.Fujishima 8, H.Hano.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
LDC Meeting Vienna 17. November 2005 Karsten Büßer LDC Machine Detector Interface Update.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
Yosuke Watanabe….. University of Tokyo, RIKEN A, KEK C, Development of a GEM tracker for E16 J-PARC 1 Thanks to ???????????
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
GLD DOD to do list and plan for IR section What to write in DOD What do be done before Jan-19 meeting (and after up to Bangalore meeting) - length : (guideline.
1 Report to Simulation Meeting 20 May, 2004 Akiya Miyamoto, KEK.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
Valencia meeting November, Contents Conditions of simulation Treatment of TPC exact hits VTX hits and tolerance TPC hits and tolerance Summary.
Software tools and Computing Akiya Miyamoto KEK 29-September-2006 At FJPPL meeting.
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
May 31th, 2007 LCWS C. Gatto 1 Tracking Studies in the 4 th Concept On behalf of 4th Concept Software Group D. Barbareschi V. Di Benedetto E. Cavallo.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
Software Status for GLD Concepts Akiya Miyamoto 31-October-2007 ILD Optimization Meeting References: - Y.Sugimoto, “GLD and GLDc”, talk at ALCPG07, ILD.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
2007/7/111 Pair Monitor studies K.Ito (Tohoku University) 2007/7/11.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
Towards Snowmass Jul. 13, 2005 Y.Sugimoto. Charge for Detector WGs Charge for Concept Groups: work towards a baseline design define performance criteria.
Doses and bunch by bunch fluctuations in BeamCal at the ILC Eliza Teodorescu FCAL Collaboration Meeting June 29-30, 2009, DESY-Zeuthen, Germany.
On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Forward Tagger Simulations
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
Summary of the FCAL Workshop Cracow, February 12-13
The Optimized Sensor Segmentation for the Very Forward Calorimeter
Maria Person Gulda , Uriel Nauenberg, Gleb Oleinik,
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
The LHC collider in Geneva
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Beam Halo Considerations for Back Angle Running
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Feb.4, 2008
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

GLD IR optimization and background study H.Fujishima, Saga-U ILCWS2007, Beijin 5 February 2007

Motivation Geant4 based full simulation (Jupiter) Anti-DID optimization in GLD Background hits in GLD detector with 3T solenoid field added anti-DID. IR optimization (FCAL inner radius)

IR Design Hole radius FCAL inner radius Beam crossing angle: 14mrad Position R [cm] Z [cm] A 1.3 4.5 B 3.4 25 C 35 D 8.2 110 E 230 F 9.04 260 G 11.94 285 H 16 320 I 400 J 6.0 K 405 L 430 M 450 N 13 O 17.7 P 36 Q 20 Hole radius FCAL inner radius Beam crossing angle: 14mrad

Anti-DID Field Solenoid with anti-DID: Bz = 3T, Bx_serpentine Andrei’s anti-DID data: (z,Bz,Br,Bx_serpentine) Downstream Upstream IP Br_x = r/d*Br*cos(theta) Br_y = r/d*Br*sin(theta) d = z*theta Anti-DID field Solenoid with anti-DID, X-Z plane

Anti-DID Optimization 1.2 times Andrei’s data is the best pass efficiency. Pair background cluster exits extraction hole. %

Background hits with anti-DID CAIN is used to generate pair background. Beam parameter is nominal at center of mass energy 500 GeV. Plain solenoid: 10 bunches Solenoid with anti-DID: 8 bunches Background hits are monitored by VTX and TPC. They are simply digitized. 500GeV Nominal で作ったbackground source.

Hits in VTX VTX map VTX in GLD has 6 layers. It consists of the 5 micron pixel charge coupled device. The signal of each 1 train is read, and 1 incident particle sound 4 pads on the average. So tolerance (1% occupancy) is 1.0*10^4 hits/cm^2/train. tolerance VTX originについて Primaryが多いはずなのに、予想以上に減っている? VTX hitにはanti-DIDは効いてこない Hits of solenoid field added anti-DID became half compared with it of plain solenoid. Do VTX hits include much backscatter? I have to study the origin of VTX hits.

Hits in TPC 1 hit in TPC consists of 5 pads (1mm*6mm) * 5 buckets (50nsec). Tolerance of TPC (0.5% occupancy) is 5*10^5 hits/50micro second. Hits of solenoid field added anti-DID is about 1/3 compared with it of plain solenoid. It is because backscatter decreased. tolerance Pad 約100万 Pad * (50musec / 50nsec * 2) / (5buckets * 5pads/hit)

IR Optimization FCAL inner radius for TPC background hits. Hole radius of extraction to decrease backscattering. Radius of beam pipe @VTX Optimizationの全体の流れ そのうちFCALのinner radiusについて取り上げる Hole radius FCAL inner radius

FCAL Inner Radius Optimization The purpose is to optimize forward calorimeter (FCAL) inner radius to decrease TPC background. Default value of FCAL inner radius was determined by simple head on geometry. But… we have to verify it by full simulation. FCAL CH2Mask BCAL FCAL Inner Radius Support Tube

Treatment of TPC hits There are continuous hits in the z direction. These are made by 1 incident particle. Estimation by the number of incidence particle. About 3 bunches are used.

Preliminary Result Results are written by 4 kinds of radiuses. 82 mm is standard. No dependency is seen. Statistics is not enough because of necessity a lot of time.

Summary Anti-DID field is optimized. → Background hits are reduced. IR optimization has been started. FCAL inner radius is under study now.